From Fedora Project Wiki

  • * How to package software -- Demonstration of taking software, packaging it, and getting it into Fedora ...e rpms, our own repository, and the koji buildsystem, to manage and deploy software in Fedora Infrastructure.
    4 KB (601 words) - 17:20, 21 May 2010
  • ...rger of the dribble, freshrpms and livna repositories, and we invite other repositories to join us. ...om people behind Dribble, Freshrpms and Livna; the plan is to maintain RPM repositories that contain add-on packages build for Fedora which can't be in Fedora itse
    11 KB (2,032 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • === Proprietary (third-party) video drivers=== {{Anchor|third-party-drivers}}
    9 KB (1,372 words) - 00:02, 15 March 2018
  • ...user who knows how to find this software (and also doesn't mind installing software that might be illegal in your geographical location), you are left with a l ...arty repositories/vendors can install their own sources of codecs (such as repositories offering patent-restricted codecs in packages)
    6 KB (877 words) - 21:32, 19 September 2016
  • ...on bugs issue|flathub-filtered-enablement|"Fedora Flathub Selection" third-party repository can't be easily enabled if you don't enable it initially|2011274 ...positories dialog later. However, the ''"Fedora Flathub Selection"'' third-party repository will not be visible there, so cannot be enabled. As a workaround
    16 KB (2,470 words) - 00:01, 15 December 2021
  • ...elease of Fedora Core 6 (Zod). Install-time access to third-party package repositories, extensive performance improvements, support for Intel-based Macs, and a ne ...to provide a notification applet, alerting the user when there is updated software available.
    7 KB (1,027 words) - 15:18, 18 September 2016
  • Fred wants to make sure any i386 software he installs on x86_64 The packages conflict, and the debuginfo repositories are composed only
    7 KB (1,034 words) - 15:48, 9 July 2008
  • == Does FedUp verify the software it runs or installs during upgrade? == == Will packages in third party repositories be upgraded? ==
    12 KB (1,995 words) - 01:57, 6 November 2015
  • ** Mention Software Patents, and the problem they represent ** The [[Forbidden items]] and the [[Third party repositories]] include helpful information. This wiki can't give specific solutions that
    3 KB (422 words) - 09:31, 8 October 2015
  • commercial entities, as well as other repositories.) can tell from the FESCo meeting logs, it was mainly usual Free Software
    9 KB (1,602 words) - 04:49, 9 June 2008
  • Occupation: Software Engineer at Red Hat Occupation: Software Engineer at Red Hat
    9 KB (1,483 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...oth packages that are destined for eventual inclusion into the main Fedora repositories and packages that are never going to make it there. Users of the repositor ...must play nice - '''no bad licenses, no proprietary software, no patented software'''.
    11 KB (1,730 words) - 19:10, 28 September 2016
  • ...Fedora packaging community, EPEL packages are 100% free/libre open source software (FLOSS). ...Project is in a position to know the pain of not having a desired piece of software included in the RHEL distribution, and also a unique position to do somethi
    24 KB (3,877 words) - 20:01, 6 January 2022
  • ...g/philosophy/free-sw.html free] and [http://opensource.org/ open source] software. Fedora has [[Packaging/LicensingGuidelines|licensing guidelines]] that en ...work with completely free and open source software and not restricted by [[Software Patents]] and other legal encumbrances.
    11 KB (1,600 words) - 18:21, 3 August 2022
  • ...ar with the terminal or to use the terminal for essential tasks, including software development. ...who needs a personal system for software classwork and personal projects. Software class work may require particular tool chain versions. Tries out new versio
    11 KB (1,724 words) - 12:34, 19 August 2022
  • ...pass when it is done. If it needs to be tested with different hardware or software configurations, indicate them. The more specific you can be, the better th * Devlopers working with third-party stacks should be able to do so without any noticable differences from using
    8 KB (1,353 words) - 01:29, 19 June 2012
  • {{Anchor|installing-software}} ...emove Software'' อีกด้วย (สำหรับ Fedora บางเวอร์ชั่นโปรแกรมนี้จะเรียกว่า ''Software'' เฉย ๆ)
    54 KB (1,575 words) - 14:22, 31 July 2015
  • * Get Fedora from a Third Party Vendor ...edoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/index.html Software Management Guide] for details on using '''Fedora tools''' to keep your syst
    6 KB (862 words) - 13:49, 18 September 2016
  • * Get Fedora from a Third Party Vendor ...edoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/index.html Software Management Guide] for details on using '''Fedora tools''' to keep your syst
    6 KB (875 words) - 03:32, 15 April 2021
  • === Release Party Reports === ...me release party and Clint Savage added his report [3] on the Utah release party. Definitely worth taking some time to read those reports of the very succe
    21 KB (3,224 words) - 10:45, 14 April 2009
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)