From Fedora Project Wiki

  • * Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> --> ...apabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
    15 KB (2,401 words) - 15:24, 26 March 2018
  • * Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> --> ...apabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
    43 KB (5,256 words) - 07:38, 7 March 2016
  • * Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> --> ...apabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
    20 KB (2,982 words) - 17:13, 16 November 2016
  • ...own roadmap and milestones, working in coordination with the upstream KDE project where appropriate, and as a result users of Fedora will be able to use the ..., marketing, bug triage, packaging, and more. With our new easier joining process, it's never been easier to get involved in Fedora. Just go to http://join.
    35 KB (5,349 words) - 18:40, 28 October 2016
  • * Project-wide, planning is blocking on [[Fedora.next]] until the WGs report to FESCo | style="color: #854685" | adamw: for that unfortunate bug in dracut, docs guys are aware and removing it
    69 KB (9,130 words) - 04:30, 20 December 2013
  • ...t was that ipsvd doesn't recommend the use of dietlibc explicitly in their docs... but enrico says some of the ipsvd maintainers have recommended it on mai [12:52] <tibbs> So basically we have another big layer of process to go through before we can do through and so, say, rebuilds?
    31 KB (4,578 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • * Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> --> ...apabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
    20 KB (2,251 words) - 06:43, 18 July 2016
  • ...[[FedoraEvents/ESLAM/ESLAM2008| ESLAM 2008]] for status<BR>. Funding in process of being sent to [[RodrigoPadula]]. || 2000 ...alley]] || Invite from school to present Fedora, and specifically the docs project and possibly to involve the tech support classes in writing documentation f
    30 KB (3,592 words) - 21:14, 19 September 2016
  • ...e people who are already developers, testers, etc. and keenly aware of the Project. ...er community a set of code to test against as a very important step in the process of making a solid Fedora 11 release. You can make the Fedora 11 release be
    23 KB (3,475 words) - 20:45, 19 September 2016
  • In this section, we cover announcements from the Fedora Project. In this section, we cover the Fedora Marketing Project.
    36 KB (5,339 words) - 13:43, 15 April 2009
  • In this section, we cover announcements from Fedora Project. ...ibe with few words what he/she thinks about Ambassadors Project and Fedora Project in general, starting from his/her vision of Ambassadors to his/her opinion
    42 KB (5,919 words) - 21:10, 20 September 2016
  • * Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> --> ...apabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
    21 KB (2,297 words) - 21:21, 30 June 2017
  • ...ibutors "a bi-weekly blog post where we’ll outline a quick-and-easy design project that needs doing for the Fedora Community..." This issue finishes up with S In this section, we cover announcements from the Fedora Project, including general announcements<ref>
    50 KB (7,198 words) - 14:20, 18 September 2016
  • ...ant interest in the future of the Fedora project and want to help grow the project. ...w would you make decisions about what is important to Fedora, and what the Project should do in the future?
    64 KB (9,024 words) - 15:26, 4 June 2009
  • Wwoods notifed the group that last week was official known as ''DOCS WEEK''. For example, see the autoqa wiki category http://fedoraproject.org/ * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA is the main page for the Fedora AutoQA project
    92 KB (11,169 words) - 08:58, 18 September 2016
  • ...e="color: #407a40">as long as we believe that to be the intended effect of process changes and not just a happy fluke</td><td class="time"><a href="#t10:10" c ...: #854685"> poelcat</th><td class="text" style="color: #854685">or is that project dead?</td><td class="time"><a href="#t10:21" class="time">10:21</a></td></t
    69 KB (11,285 words) - 15:35, 21 February 2014
  • === What is ''The Fedora Project'' to you? === For me, The Fedora project represents a community of people working together on a multitude of project
    101 KB (17,724 words) - 07:59, 18 September 2016
  • * Fedora project WiKi page of test day * I found docs sufficient
    21 KB (3,752 words) - 15:34, 1 July 2009
  • ...of this work that you can comfortably accomplish, the faster the editorial process will go, given our current dearth of resources.'' -- PWF 2007-09-07 Use the ''Apply'' command button to start the process.
    56 KB (8,777 words) - 18:03, 30 December 2008
  • After the initial announcement from Fedora Project [1] about renewed focus, ...re team is looking for volunteers to integrate Jidgo [2] into the release process of Fedora as a potential solution to this problem. If you are interested in
    65 KB (9,787 words) - 10:49, 14 April 2009
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)