From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

  • File:Lxde-feature-sample.png
    (232 × 80 (13 KB)) - 03:50, 9 July 2011
  • Tcms feature requirements
    ...-Have features missed currently in Nitrate TCMS based on [[Tcms_Comparison|feature comparison table]]. !Feature||Description
    5 KB (684 words) - 05:43, 5 May 2011
  • Feature/Security Guide
    37 bytes (4 words) - 18:11, 22 January 2009
  • Changes to Feature Process
    The Feature Process has proven itself to be clunky. We need to think about changes to Perhaps the most problematic issue with the Feature Process is that it is really meant to address three separate needs with som
    2 KB (376 words) - 17:18, 22 March 2011
  • Category:QA approved feature pages
    ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.
    4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
  • File:F13-feature-profiles)markedup.pdf
    ...d up some proposed changes to layout/formatting on this version of the f13 feature profiles pdf.
    (470 KB) - 16:36, 3 June 2010
  • File:F13-feature-profiles final2.pdf
    Final layout PDF for the F13 Feature Profiles
    (385 KB) - 22:10, 23 June 2010
  • F13 feature profiles
    ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ...stribution at events: [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.pdf|(pdf)]] [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.odt|(source)]]
    3 KB (460 words) - 16:08, 23 April 2018
  • DocBook Editor Feature
    = Feature Name = * Name: [[User:Satyak| Satya Komaragiri]]
    7 KB (1,128 words) - 00:54, 12 June 2009
  • Rjones/Old Hostinfo Feature
    * Name: [[User:Rjones| Richard Jones]] We propose to add a feature which allows the host administrator, at their discretion, and only of limit
    4 KB (591 words) - 21:14, 28 March 2015
  • Bugs and feature requests/es
    16 KB (2,654 words) - 16:36, 6 December 2012
  • Bugs and feature requests
    82 bytes (8 words) - 20:06, 26 January 2022
  • Bugs and feature requests/bg
    ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    15 KB (2,111 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
  • Bugs and feature requests/zh-cn
    ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    14 KB (2,240 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
  • Bugs and feature requests/it
    ...nalizzata ed approvata, secondo il processo indicato in [[Features/Policy| Feature Policy]]. ...o al report, contenente le informazioni, la dicitura '''Future<code></code>Feature'''.
    15 KB (2,241 words) - 18:12, 21 July 2016
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.png
    Feature process workflow diagram
    (829 × 582 (152 KB)) - 16:37, 2 August 2008
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.svg
    Source for feature policy process workflow diagram
    (63 KB) - 16:39, 2 August 2008
  • Bugs and feature requests/fr
    ...tout en bas à gauche) {{Clickable|File a new bug in the {{Replace|packgage name}} component of the Fedora Product}} (Signaler un nouveau bogue du {{Replace
    20 KB (3,061 words) - 20:21, 18 March 2019
  • Bugs and feature requests/en
    #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]
    39 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 23 September 2017
  • Bugs and feature requests/ko
    ...for specific bugs for a package (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package you are checking). ...ect.org/{{Replace|packagename}}] (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package). From this point, there are two ways to complete your filli
    16 KB (2,507 words) - 16:33, 7 April 2021

Page text matches

  • Changes/cron-to-systemd-time-units
    ...o requirements by FESCO/FPC. Please submit a new feature proposal for this feature which has been adjusted to meet those requirments and outlines those change
    323 bytes (53 words) - 09:04, 2 April 2020
  • Category:FeatureAnnounced
    ...nounce mailing list for broader community review. No sooner than one week, feature is sent to [[:Category:FeatureReadyForFesco | FESCo for final approval]]. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF
    1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:36, 29 January 2013
  • Features/Policy/Status
    ...status is show as a percentage under the ''Current Status'' section of the feature page. ...rcentage completion does not reflect the level of unfixed bugs or that the feature has been fully tested.
    2 KB (336 words) - 15:33, 9 December 2011
  • SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2012-07-10
    * finishing the Feature Page '''finishing the Feature Page'''
    871 bytes (114 words) - 16:00, 10 July 2012
  • Fedora 18 talking points
    ...dora community member can introduce a feature, using our [[Features/Policy|feature process]]. === Feature ===
    2 KB (234 words) - 14:08, 18 September 2016
  • JaroslavReznik/Features
    == Incomplete feature ==
    193 bytes (18 words) - 15:31, 22 January 2009
  • Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20080214
    === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    2 KB (240 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20080313
    === F9 Feature Process === ...poelcat) is going to send out a reminder to feature owners to update their feature statuses.
    1,022 bytes (136 words) - 23:06, 5 June 2008
  • Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20080228
    === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • Features/Policy/Milestones
    ...cepted by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) up until the ''Feature Submission Deadline'': ** Two weeks before the ''Feature Freeze'' milestone.
    2 KB (376 words) - 22:21, 25 September 2014
  • Features/Policy/Acceptance
    {{Anchor|feature-accept}} === Feature Acceptance ===
    2 KB (310 words) - 23:03, 17 August 2009
  • Features/Policy/Proposals
    {{Anchor|feature-proposal}} ...pplicable'' with an explanation) before the Feature Wrangler will submit a feature to FESCo for acceptance.}}
    2 KB (261 words) - 11:20, 9 January 2013
  • Features/F10PolicyReview
    = Fedora 10 Feature Policy Review = | This page is to track changes and discussion changes to the Fedora 10 feature process based on our experiences during Fedora 9 development. This is a pub
    2 KB (317 words) - 17:03, 3 July 2008
  • Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20080117
    === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    1 KB (184 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • Category:ProposedFedora9
    ...sed]] for [[Releases/9| Fedora 9]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:05, 23 February 2009
  • Category:ProposedFedora10
    ...sed]] for [[Releases/10| Fedora 10]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:07, 23 February 2009
  • Category:QA approved feature pages
    ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.
    4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
  • Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20071115
    === Feature Process === * Long discussion on fixing parts of the Feature Process based on F8 experience. Quick & dirty summary (for more details, p
    1 KB (187 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20071206
    === Are "spins" a feature? === === F9 Feature Process ===
    2 KB (204 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • Features/Policy/Ideas
    {{Anchor|feature-ideas}} === New Feature Ideas ===
    763 bytes (121 words) - 14:08, 19 September 2010
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:Search"