From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- 3 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 15:57, 3 February 2010
Page text matches
- = Distribution of Spins, the problem = ...ere's constraints as to how much data the Fedora Project can distribute to it's mirrors.1 KB (215 words) - 20:13, 26 June 2009
- ...live spin serves as a way to try OpenShift Origin, demo it or even develop it. ...and use. The installation will be all-in-one with possiblity of extending it by adding new application nodes.2 KB (265 words) - 20:41, 22 November 2013
- = About the Spins SIG = ...ect.org, and develops, releases and maintains the utilities used to create spins.2 KB (344 words) - 21:56, 28 February 2011
- ...ng to http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-April/089943.html it might not be. ...s somewhat by the specific media. Using 700 MiB as a safe upper bound (for spins targeting CD media) is probably a reasonable thing to do going forward.580 bytes (97 words) - 01:28, 26 October 2010
- = Spins repo directives = ** This is included by spins (often indirectly).549 bytes (84 words) - 16:44, 29 June 2013
- * Will a spin owner have to create a new spins page for each release? * Do we need spins pages created for all Fedora 11 spins, even if they existed for previous releases?2 KB (326 words) - 23:37, 3 August 2009
- The Spins Special Interest Group reviews, tests and approves Fedora Spins. Participants in this SIG are delegates from QA, Release Engineering, the F == What is it we do? ==5 KB (730 words) - 19:17, 8 August 2018
- <!-- When your spins page is completed and ready for review, remove Category:Spins_in_Development and change it to Category:Spins_Ready_For_Wrangler2 KB (318 words) - 13:18, 16 January 2015
- ...an OpenStack enabled Fedora out of the box, providing a Cloud on one node. It's intended as demo material. Deploying OpenStack based on this spin to seve <!-- When your spins page is completed and ready for review,2 KB (322 words) - 08:23, 28 November 2012
- It's spins day! ==== 95: Request: please consider clarifying the project's position on Spins ====2 KB (293 words) - 05:00, 22 June 2012
- It could be used in Uni CS labs, etc and by people who want a portable Haskell <!-- When your spins page is completed and ready for review,2 KB (377 words) - 07:05, 29 October 2010
- * Spins discussion == Spins discussion ==2 KB (241 words) - 17:44, 11 October 2011
- * Does it meet the [[Spins Guidelines]]? * Has it undergone some basic testing?293 bytes (48 words) - 22:03, 14 February 2012
- This page describes the DOs and DONTs for Spins being submitted for review to the [[Spins_SIG|Spin SIG]] . ...nclude guidelines with regards to the snippet layout as proposed in [[SIGs/Spins/KickstartPool|Kickstart Pool]] .3 KB (427 words) - 05:40, 18 April 2021
- It is intended for users who want to easily do smaller custom installations by should be more stable during the development cycle than larger spins.4 KB (614 words) - 10:02, 23 January 2012
- {{admon/important|If you would like to improve this content, it is recommended to find fact from here. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Featur == Spins ==2 KB (234 words) - 14:08, 18 September 2016
- * anyone to learn about what spins are and how to use them * users to be able to browse, download, and start using spins4 KB (590 words) - 20:38, 27 October 2013
- ** Policy on spins-list membership for spin maintainers. ...squashfs patches to the kernel list on December 7th. So effectively larger spins may be doable for F13.1 KB (242 words) - 02:05, 15 December 2009
- ...edora {{FedoraVersionNumber|next}}, and so forth, fall under the Recurring Spins process. ...jor changes to the spin from going unnoticed. It is not like all recurring spins will have to go through the entire review process step-by-step once more.3 KB (482 words) - 00:29, 29 August 2016
- === Are spins required to have SELinux enabled? === * FESCo would like the Spins SIG to work on a proposal to make their guidelines(1) meet the QA Release C1 KB (197 words) - 08:02, 18 September 2016