From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- 2 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 21:14, 8 June 2008
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rdieter/packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 17:25, 26 June 2010
- 547 bytes (77 words) - 18:59, 18 January 2009
- 0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 08:56, 26 June 2008
- [[Category:Packages|mksh]]966 bytes (160 words) - 19:33, 15 December 2008
- These are packages that the [[ISV Special Interest Group]] need reviewers and sponsors for.434 bytes (63 words) - 19:18, 10 December 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:52, 10 February 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Retire Orphaned Packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:04, 30 May 2014
- == Review of Power specific packages == The goal is to review all architecture packages with respect to their need during installer run and during boot. During ins4 KB (655 words) - 15:33, 11 August 2017
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png (1,250 × 700 (67 KB)) - 18:02, 6 August 2008- = Harden All Packages <!-- The name of your change proposal --> = ...rdened. Beginning with Fedora 23 this will now become the defaults for all packages. You can compare the security by running the following as root:12 KB (1,867 words) - 08:50, 9 January 2019
- 3 KB (237 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- ...ode>sendmail-cf</code>, or, more generally, anything that depends on these packages) This list was generated by looking at all the packages in current Core and Extras Rawhide that own a file in <code>/etc/rc.d/init.18 KB (2,663 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- == Network configuration packages == There is no uniform way to test the following packages.5 KB (741 words) - 10:42, 14 December 2015
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.svg (58 KB) - 18:03, 6 August 2008- 35 bytes (3 words) - 19:25, 21 November 2014
- ...f3916e4d76c83ebf8a6b4ff81c4cb05597">Amateur Radio Special Interest Group - Packages</h1> ===Packages now in Fedora===28 KB (3,963 words) - 15:33, 6 February 2022
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]45 bytes (6 words) - 12:13, 25 May 2010
- ...e queried, installed and removed, and whether they install the appropriate packages. For testing the feature rather than the availability of support for a give # To list what packages will get installed for any language, run the following command:2 KB (283 words) - 07:51, 1 September 2021
Page text matches
- ==Packages To Be Removed== ==Apps To Be Removed From Larger Packages==501 bytes (77 words) - 18:56, 14 June 2010
- MinGW source packages have a circular dependency: == Bootstrap packages ==2 KB (276 words) - 14:54, 24 November 2008
- == Packages == I (co-)maintain the following packages for Fedora:887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
- === Packages I Maintain === === Projects/Packages I'm Working On ===428 bytes (49 words) - 19:17, 21 April 2018
- * [https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/cheese/projects Packages owned] == Packages outside of Fedora ==587 bytes (76 words) - 15:09, 22 February 2021
- ...that they are installed rather than Core packages. And when such important packages are replaced it can be ''very'' difficult to remove them.667 bytes (104 words) - 22:48, 2 June 2008
- ...elements are not too big. We may just need one query here to ask for all packages you maintain and own (own is a subset of maintain) sorted by owned and subs ...nd links to their info page. We need a fast query in pkgdb to ask for all packages that is owned by a user and get a count. I don't think the DB was structur1 KB (209 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
- == My Packages == ([https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/boodle Free Time])330 bytes (45 words) - 18:39, 8 February 2011
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- == Packages == ...://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/brouhaha?acls=owner Fedora packages].966 bytes (122 words) - 07:38, 16 August 2017
- == Packages == * '''Packages''' [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/user/tonyskapunk by tonyskapunk715 bytes (92 words) - 19:46, 16 June 2021
- == Noarch Packages == ...of arch independent data should be packaged to noarch subpackages. Noarch packages and subpackages must contain the same content no matter on which architectu750 bytes (107 words) - 18:47, 27 January 2009
- == Packages (primary maintainer) == [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/weka weka]2 KB (200 words) - 01:47, 14 March 2009
- === Documentation Packages with Embedded OS versioning === Documentation packages (as approved by the Fedora Documentation Project) can be named with the OS438 bytes (62 words) - 17:42, 31 March 2009
- ...packages from mainstream packages similar to how [[Packaging:MinGW| MingW packages]] are managed. ...tion. Packages '''MUST''' be updated to restrict SCL macros to only those packages particularly approved as part of an SCL.699 bytes (102 words) - 15:15, 3 July 2014
- The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Pa But there are some exceptions for packages in EPEL, which are listed below.1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
- The packages listed below failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after All failed packages with build log were reported in bugzilla on 2005-04-28.550 bytes (81 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- == Packages ==385 bytes (55 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...his test case involves the [[Critical Path Packages Proposal|Critical Path packages]]. The package list is still being defined and the tools for generating the ...=A test to ensure that the [[Critical Path Packages Proposal|Critical Path Packages]] are present and not corrupted.1 KB (163 words) - 20:41, 13 July 2009
- ...in computer security and I am also maintaining couple of security-related packages for Fedora Distribution. == My packages ==727 bytes (99 words) - 03:44, 4 August 2016