From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

  • ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.
    4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
  • File:F13-feature-profiles)markedup.pdf
    ...d up some proposed changes to layout/formatting on this version of the f13 feature profiles pdf.
    (470 KB) - 16:36, 3 June 2010
  • File:F13-feature-profiles final2.pdf
    Final layout PDF for the F13 Feature Profiles
    (385 KB) - 22:10, 23 June 2010
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ...stribution at events: [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.pdf|(pdf)]] [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.odt|(source)]]
    3 KB (460 words) - 16:08, 23 April 2018
  • = Feature Name = * Name: [[User:Satyak| Satya Komaragiri]]
    7 KB (1,128 words) - 00:54, 12 June 2009
  • * Name: [[User:Rjones| Richard Jones]] We propose to add a feature which allows the host administrator, at their discretion, and only of limit
    4 KB (591 words) - 21:14, 28 March 2015
  • ...lines two complementary ways to slim down FESCo's time commitment with the Feature Process. == Delegate power to drop to the Feature Wrangler ==
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 00:38, 26 September 2014
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
  • File:Feature-process-flow.png
    (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:51, 1 August 2008
  • 35 bytes (4 words) - 21:33, 8 July 2014
  • 16 KB (2,654 words) - 16:36, 6 December 2012
  • 82 bytes (8 words) - 20:06, 26 January 2022
  • ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    15 KB (2,111 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.png
    Feature process workflow diagram
    (829 × 582 (152 KB)) - 16:37, 2 August 2008
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.svg
    Source for feature policy process workflow diagram
    (63 KB) - 16:39, 2 August 2008
  • ...tout en bas à gauche) {{Clickable|File a new bug in the {{Replace|packgage name}} component of the Fedora Product}} (Signaler un nouveau bogue du {{Replace
    20 KB (3,061 words) - 20:21, 18 March 2019
  • #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]
    39 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 23 September 2017
  • ...for specific bugs for a package (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package you are checking). ...ect.org/{{Replace|packagename}}] (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package). From this point, there are two ways to complete your filli
    16 KB (2,507 words) - 16:33, 7 April 2021
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow.png
    (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:52, 1 August 2008
  • ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    15 KB (2,120 words) - 12:25, 30 November 2015

Page text matches

  • ...o requirements by FESCO/FPC. Please submit a new feature proposal for this feature which has been adjusted to meet those requirments and outlines those change
    323 bytes (53 words) - 09:04, 2 April 2020
  • ...nounce mailing list for broader community review. No sooner than one week, feature is sent to [[:Category:FeatureReadyForFesco | FESCo for final approval]]. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF
    1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:36, 29 January 2013
  • ...status is show as a percentage under the ''Current Status'' section of the feature page. ...rcentage completion does not reflect the level of unfixed bugs or that the feature has been fully tested.
    2 KB (336 words) - 15:33, 9 December 2011
  • * finishing the Feature Page '''finishing the Feature Page'''
    871 bytes (114 words) - 16:00, 10 July 2012
  • ...dora community member can introduce a feature, using our [[Features/Policy|feature process]]. === Feature ===
    2 KB (234 words) - 14:08, 18 September 2016
  • == Incomplete feature ==
    193 bytes (18 words) - 15:31, 22 January 2009
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    2 KB (240 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === ...poelcat) is going to send out a reminder to feature owners to update their feature statuses.
    1,022 bytes (136 words) - 23:06, 5 June 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...cepted by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) up until the ''Feature Submission Deadline'': ** Two weeks before the ''Feature Freeze'' milestone.
    2 KB (376 words) - 22:21, 25 September 2014
  • {{Anchor|feature-accept}} === Feature Acceptance ===
    2 KB (310 words) - 23:03, 17 August 2009
  • {{Anchor|feature-proposal}} ...pplicable'' with an explanation) before the Feature Wrangler will submit a feature to FESCo for acceptance.}}
    2 KB (261 words) - 11:20, 9 January 2013
  • = Fedora 10 Feature Policy Review = | This page is to track changes and discussion changes to the Fedora 10 feature process based on our experiences during Fedora 9 development. This is a pub
    2 KB (317 words) - 17:03, 3 July 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    1 KB (184 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • ...sed]] for [[Releases/9| Fedora 9]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:05, 23 February 2009
  • ...sed]] for [[Releases/10| Fedora 10]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:07, 23 February 2009
  • ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.
    4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
  • === Feature Process === * Long discussion on fixing parts of the Feature Process based on F8 experience. Quick & dirty summary (for more details, p
    1 KB (187 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • === Are "spins" a feature? === === F9 Feature Process ===
    2 KB (204 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • {{Anchor|feature-ideas}} === New Feature Ideas ===
    763 bytes (121 words) - 14:08, 19 September 2010
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)