From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
File:F13-feature-profiles.odt (528 KB) - 03:15, 3 June 2010- #REDIRECT [[:Category:Feature profiles]]40 bytes (4 words) - 00:45, 30 March 2010
- The following is a place holder for the F16 feature profiles. ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]].761 bytes (111 words) - 05:29, 6 June 2011
- ...so request that you maintain the same order of sections so that all of the feature pages are uniform. --> <!-- The actual name of your feature page should look something like: Features/YourFeatureName. This keeps all9 KB (1,385 words) - 17:28, 17 April 2009
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature1 KB (197 words) - 20:03, 26 October 2010
- For each feature, the marketing owner should do several things: # Make sure that the feature is reflected on the [[F11_Talking_Points|talking points]].2 KB (323 words) - 04:59, 19 March 2010
- ...on on what feature profiles are and how to make them is available at the [[Feature profiles SOP]].18 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 04:57, 19 March 2010
- For each feature, the marketing owner should do several things: # Make sure that the feature is reflected on the [[Fedora_12_Talking_Points|talking points]].2 KB (303 words) - 05:00, 19 March 2010
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature524 bytes (74 words) - 17:35, 26 April 2011
- 32 bytes (3 words) - 05:26, 13 January 2011
- 29 bytes (3 words) - 13:55, 21 April 2010
- 38 bytes (3 words) - 03:41, 11 December 2008
File:F13-feature-profiles.pdf (373 KB) - 03:14, 3 June 2010- The Feature Process has proven itself to be clunky. We need to think about changes to Perhaps the most problematic issue with the Feature Process is that it is really meant to address three separate needs with som2 KB (376 words) - 17:18, 22 March 2011
- ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
File:F13-feature-profiles)markedup.pdf ...d up some proposed changes to layout/formatting on this version of the f13 feature profiles pdf.(470 KB) - 16:36, 3 June 2010File:F13-feature-profiles final2.pdf Final layout PDF for the F13 Feature Profiles(385 KB) - 22:10, 23 June 2010- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ...stribution at events: [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.pdf|(pdf)]] [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.odt|(source)]]3 KB (460 words) - 16:08, 23 April 2018
- = Feature Name = * Name: [[User:Satyak| Satya Komaragiri]]7 KB (1,128 words) - 00:54, 12 June 2009
- * Name: [[User:Rjones| Richard Jones]] We propose to add a feature which allows the host administrator, at their discretion, and only of limit4 KB (591 words) - 21:14, 28 March 2015
- ...lines two complementary ways to slim down FESCo's time commitment with the Feature Process. == Delegate power to drop to the Feature Wrangler ==7 KB (1,208 words) - 00:38, 26 September 2014
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
File:Feature-process-flow.png (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:51, 1 August 2008- 35 bytes (4 words) - 21:33, 8 July 2014
- 4 bytes (1 word) - 19:17, 16 December 2014
- ...[[:Category:Marketing SOPs|Marketing SOP]] that describes how to create [[Feature profiles]]. You can see examples of past feature profiles at [[:Category:Feature profiles]].8 KB (1,392 words) - 09:50, 18 September 2016
- ...inition]], but here are some questions to ask yourself before engaging the feature process. ...equires a very simple intervention to revert behavior is not necessarily a feature.827 bytes (122 words) - 20:37, 8 August 2008
File:Lxde-feature-sample.png (232 × 80 (13 KB)) - 03:50, 9 July 2011- ...-Have features missed currently in Nitrate TCMS based on [[Tcms_Comparison|feature comparison table]]. !Feature||Description5 KB (684 words) - 05:43, 5 May 2011
- 37 bytes (4 words) - 18:11, 22 January 2009
- 82 bytes (8 words) - 20:06, 26 January 2022
- ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.15 KB (2,111 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
- 16 KB (2,654 words) - 16:36, 6 December 2012
File:Features Policy feature-process-flow.odg (15 KB) - 17:55, 1 August 2008
File:Feature-Guide-3.0-Repository-Task1.png (646 × 600 (195 KB)) - 03:50, 31 May 2011- ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.14 KB (2,240 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
- ...nalizzata ed approvata, secondo il processo indicato in [[Features/Policy| Feature Policy]]. ...o al report, contenente le informazioni, la dicitura '''Future<code></code>Feature'''.15 KB (2,241 words) - 18:12, 21 July 2016
File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.png Feature process workflow diagram(829 × 582 (152 KB)) - 16:37, 2 August 2008
File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.svg Source for feature policy process workflow diagram(63 KB) - 16:39, 2 August 2008- ...tout en bas à gauche) {{Clickable|File a new bug in the {{Replace|packgage name}} component of the Fedora Product}} (Signaler un nouveau bogue du {{Replace20 KB (3,061 words) - 20:21, 18 March 2019
- #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]39 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 23 September 2017
- ...for specific bugs for a package (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package you are checking). ...ect.org/{{Replace|packagename}}] (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package). From this point, there are two ways to complete your filli16 KB (2,507 words) - 16:33, 7 April 2021
File:Features Policy feature-process-flow.png (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:52, 1 August 2008- ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.15 KB (2,120 words) - 12:25, 30 November 2015
- 26 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 20:00, 12 May 2022
Page text matches
- This category collects Feature pages with incomplete Scope sections. ...ture. This will help determine what needs to be tested to confirm that the Feature is complete and functioning as expected.2 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 03:25, 26 February 2009
- === Feature Schedule === === I've got this great feature idea! ===499 bytes (71 words) - 02:11, 26 November 2008
- === Feature Schedule === === I've got this great feature idea! ===520 bytes (77 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- === Feature Schedule === === I've got this great feature idea! ===750 bytes (105 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature524 bytes (74 words) - 17:35, 26 April 2011
- {{admon/important|Deprecated process|From Fedora 20 the Feature process was replaces by the [[Changes | Planning Process]]! Please, follow ...plate | an empty feature form]] or a [[Features/ExampleFeature | completed feature example]].}}2 KB (226 words) - 11:36, 3 June 2013
- {{admon/important|Deprecated process|DaFedora 20 il Feature process é stato sostituito con il [[Changes | Planning Process]]! Segui le = Feature delle versioni in sviluppo =1 KB (148 words) - 23:20, 24 January 2016
- {{admon/important|Deprecated process|From Fedora 20 the Feature process was replaced by the [[Changes | Planning Process]]! Please, follow Fedora 19 (Schrödinger's Cat) - [[Releases/19/FeatureList | Feature list]]1 KB (158 words) - 19:37, 30 March 2015
- ...on on what feature profiles are and how to make them is available at the [[Feature profiles SOP]].18 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 04:57, 19 March 2010
- The following is a place holder for the F16 feature profiles. ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]].761 bytes (111 words) - 05:29, 6 June 2011
- == Feature Process == # New feature ideas may be added at any time to the wiki1 KB (184 words) - 12:09, 11 December 2012
- A feature will be proposed to FESCo for review by the Feature Wrangler if any of the following occurs: ...85% complete) or not testable at [[ReleaseEngineering/FeatureFreezePolicy| Feature Freeze]]1 KB (202 words) - 19:18, 23 September 2009
- ...ry:FeatureReadyForFesco | sending them to FESCo]] they are reviewed by the Feature Wrangler. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureAnnoun6 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:37, 29 January 2013
- = Fedora Feature Dashboard = {{Admon/note | This page is maintained by the [[JohnPoelstra| Feature Wrangler]] --he gets less confused if he is the only person making changes2 KB (233 words) - 09:35, 24 June 2010
- == Feature: Empathy - [[Features/Empathy]] == FESCo approved Empathy as a Fedora 12 feature by a 7-0 vote.633 bytes (84 words) - 08:05, 18 September 2016
- = Feature Writer = ...st developers and package maintainers with the creation and maintenance of feature pages734 bytes (96 words) - 22:27, 14 July 2008
- Describe the dimensions of tests that this feature is expected to pass when it is done. If it needs to be tested with differe ...sting is OK, but it's much better to document what *I* can do to test your feature.1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 03:26, 26 February 2009
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
- The name of the release is '''Fedora 7''', unlike previous ones which featured 'Core Feature freeze:: All features must be complete in a testable state. Anything that's2 KB (234 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- == Feature Testing == ...Test 1. It is useful to test these specific items in the test release the feature was enabled subsequent test releases to make sure there are no regressions.974 bytes (130 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ...o requirements by FESCO/FPC. Please submit a new feature proposal for this feature which has been adjusted to meet those requirments and outlines those change323 bytes (53 words) - 09:04, 2 April 2020
- ...nounce mailing list for broader community review. No sooner than one week, feature is sent to [[:Category:FeatureReadyForFesco | FESCo for final approval]]. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:36, 29 January 2013
- ...status is show as a percentage under the ''Current Status'' section of the feature page. ...rcentage completion does not reflect the level of unfixed bugs or that the feature has been fully tested.2 KB (336 words) - 15:33, 9 December 2011
- * finishing the Feature Page '''finishing the Feature Page'''871 bytes (114 words) - 16:00, 10 July 2012
- ...dora community member can introduce a feature, using our [[Features/Policy|feature process]]. === Feature ===2 KB (234 words) - 14:08, 18 September 2016
- == Incomplete feature ==193 bytes (18 words) - 15:31, 22 January 2009
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:2 KB (240 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- === F9 Feature Process === ...poelcat) is going to send out a reminder to feature owners to update their feature statuses.1,022 bytes (136 words) - 23:06, 5 June 2008
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- ...cepted by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) up until the ''Feature Submission Deadline'': ** Two weeks before the ''Feature Freeze'' milestone.2 KB (376 words) - 22:21, 25 September 2014
- {{Anchor|feature-accept}} === Feature Acceptance ===2 KB (310 words) - 23:03, 17 August 2009
- {{Anchor|feature-proposal}} ...pplicable'' with an explanation) before the Feature Wrangler will submit a feature to FESCo for acceptance.}}2 KB (261 words) - 11:20, 9 January 2013
- = Fedora 10 Feature Policy Review = | This page is to track changes and discussion changes to the Fedora 10 feature process based on our experiences during Fedora 9 development. This is a pub2 KB (317 words) - 17:03, 3 July 2008
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:1 KB (184 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
- ...sed]] for [[Releases/10| Fedora 10]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:07, 23 February 2009
- ...sed]] for [[Releases/9| Fedora 9]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:05, 23 February 2009
- ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
- === Feature Process === * Long discussion on fixing parts of the Feature Process based on F8 experience. Quick & dirty summary (for more details, p1 KB (187 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- === Are "spins" a feature? === === F9 Feature Process ===2 KB (204 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- {{Anchor|feature-ideas}} === New Feature Ideas ===763 bytes (121 words) - 14:08, 19 September 2010
- Features in this category have been reviewed by the Feature Wrangler and are ready for an acceptance vote by FESCo * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:38, 29 January 2013
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:1 KB (160 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:2 KB (285 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature1 KB (197 words) - 20:03, 26 October 2010
- ...pletely defined. This resulted in last minute surprises when a particular feature that had been advertised as being an important part of the next release was ...se Notes creation for new features--everything needed is on the individual feature pages.2 KB (314 words) - 17:19, 15 July 2008
- <span style="color: gray; "><s>empty, no feature pages</s></span> * <span style="color: gray; "><s>Entertainment - empty and no feature pages.</s></span>3 KB (488 words) - 00:13, 28 July 2010
- == Feature #1 == == Feature #2 ==1 KB (145 words) - 20:45, 26 August 2013
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:955 bytes (120 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- ...is discussed (Feature owners will need to include e-mail addresses on the feature page).1 KB (165 words) - 00:36, 13 November 2008
- ...e Release Engineering final say in acking spins for a release based on the Feature criteria. If there are disagreements between spins sig/owner they can be e * FESCo approved the following feature for F10:2 KB (204 words) - 19:47, 30 July 2008
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:1 KB (176 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- This category is for Feature pages that are [[:Category:FeatureReadyForFesco|ready for FESCo]] (or FESCo After the QA review, the page will be moved to [[:Category:QA approved feature pages]] if it meets QA requirements. If not, it may be placed in [[:Categor0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 03:25, 26 February 2009
- ...citing release! To help celebrate these facts we're preparing a series of "feature previews", including interviews with the developers behind Fedora 8's key f == Feature Previews ==857 bytes (110 words) - 21:04, 19 September 2016
- ...ly two different ways to release software. One is time-based, the other is feature-based. ...of the release must be completed or removed from the feature list before a feature-based release is ready.1 KB (170 words) - 22:36, 19 August 2013
- == Feature List ==805 bytes (103 words) - 16:16, 29 May 2008
- ...is a '''sub-subpage''' of [[Help:Subpages]], created as an example of the feature. ...automatically appear under the page name header at the top. If the subpage feature is turned off, this will not appear.414 bytes (64 words) - 00:19, 6 March 2009
- === New Feature Proposals Approvals === ...fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Features/NodokaTheme - FESCo approved this feature with the caveat that the Art team must also acknowledge their approval.2 KB (217 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- ...to single-page sheets [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.pdf|(pdf)]] [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.odt|(source)]] * [[Python in Fedora 13]] -- an in-depth feature profile more than a press kit module, right now.889 bytes (121 words) - 21:39, 17 September 2016
- === New Feature Proposals Approvals === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Transifex - FESCo approved this feature proposal.1 KB (210 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- === Feature Policy Draft === * FESCo approved John Poelstra's Feature Policy Draft, with the caveat that spot's suggestion regarding the drafting1 KB (147 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- ...itched off, any slashes (/) within a page name are simply part of the page name and do nothing special. Slashes (/) within a page name break the page into parent and subpages, recursively, e.g.:2 KB (330 words) - 00:36, 6 March 2009
File:Add to watchlist.png Weblate feature(2,876 × 1,540 (279 KB)) - 07:18, 8 March 2020- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:1 KB (196 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- New Feature Test Matrix <!-- Check Releases/7/Features for the feature list; this needs to stay in sync with that!2 KB (218 words) - 00:19, 6 January 2015
- #REDIRECT [[F11 feature profiles]]34 bytes (4 words) - 15:16, 15 June 2010
File:Project search.png project search feature(2,878 × 1,532 (287 KB)) - 08:05, 8 March 2020- #REDIRECT [[F13 feature profiles]]1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 04:55, 19 March 2010
- #REDIRECT [[F11 feature profiles]]5 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 04:59, 19 March 2010
- #REDIRECT [[F12 feature profiles]]34 bytes (4 words) - 15:16, 15 June 2010
- #REDIRECT [[F12 feature profiles]]1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 05:00, 19 March 2010
- ...the ''feature process'' and do not fit the [[Features/Policy#definition| feature definition]] below. == Definition of a Feature ==2 KB (351 words) - 16:50, 17 January 2011
- === New Feature Proposals Approvals === * This feature will necessitate a rebuild of packages. FESCo will look into having this r2 KB (353 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- This is a '''subpage''' of [[Help:Subpages]], created as an example of the feature. ...automatically appear under the page name header at the top. If the subpage feature is turned off, this will not appear.396 bytes (65 words) - 00:19, 6 March 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]39 bytes (5 words) - 11:08, 2 April 2009
- #REDIRECT [[:Category:Feature profiles]]40 bytes (4 words) - 00:45, 30 March 2010
File:F13-feature-profiles final2.pdf Final layout PDF for the F13 Feature Profiles(385 KB) - 22:10, 23 June 2010File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.png Feature process workflow diagram(829 × 582 (152 KB)) - 16:37, 2 August 2008- #REDIRECT [[:Category:Feature profiles]]0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 05:07, 19 March 2010
- ...inition]], but here are some questions to ask yourself before engaging the feature process. ...equires a very simple intervention to revert behavior is not necessarily a feature.827 bytes (122 words) - 20:37, 8 August 2008
- FESCo approved the guidelines for common package name conflicts by a 8-0 vote. == Feature: liblvm - [[Features/liblvm]] ==2 KB (230 words) - 08:04, 18 September 2016
- Interviews do ''not'' have to center around release-specific Feature List or Talking Points items. * And of course, Feature List / Talking Points owners2 KB (319 words) - 23:44, 23 June 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]39 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 23 September 2017
- === Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following proposals to the Feature process:929 bytes (115 words) - 20:27, 7 July 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests/ru]]42 bytes (6 words) - 12:25, 30 November 2015
File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.svg Source for feature policy process workflow diagram(63 KB) - 16:39, 2 August 2008- === New Feature Proposals Approvals === ...brought up a bug that wasn't being fixed that was blocking the disable xfs feature. caillon will contact the bugs owner, and confirm the changes to fix this2 KB (267 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- This feature has been moved to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Hadoop118 bytes (18 words) - 21:17, 8 July 2013
- * Feature details5 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:33, 25 November 2008
- ...sition was known as the ''Feature Wrangler'' and was associated with the ''Feature process'' which was replaced by the Change process. It is commonly held by !Release || Change (Feature) Wrangler892 bytes (104 words) - 13:11, 14 August 2018
- * FESCo approved the following feature for F10: *** They approved this feature, but did have a few questions they wanted clarified.2 KB (215 words) - 08:02, 18 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]127 bytes (21 words) - 11:08, 2 April 2009
- == Upstairs near the bar/terrace (on top of room "Feature") ==704 bytes (96 words) - 13:57, 28 June 2009
- See [[Features/RhythmboxDefaultRipper]] for a related feature page.89 bytes (10 words) - 18:53, 15 August 2015
- === New Feature Proposals Approvals ===2 KB (201 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- * FESCo did not feel the ReviewOMatic feature fit the criteria of a feature but encouraged it otherwise:2 KB (308 words) - 08:03, 18 September 2016
File:F13-feature-profiles)markedup.pdf ...d up some proposed changes to layout/formatting on this version of the f13 feature profiles pdf.(470 KB) - 16:36, 3 June 2010- The pages in this category are being watched by the Feature Wrangler and have missing items that have been requested to be fixed.3 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 22:53, 13 October 2009
- The Feature Process has proven itself to be clunky. We need to think about changes to Perhaps the most problematic issue with the Feature Process is that it is really meant to address three separate needs with som2 KB (376 words) - 17:18, 22 March 2011
- For each feature, the marketing owner should do several things: # Make sure that the feature is reflected on the [[Fedora_12_Talking_Points|talking points]].2 KB (303 words) - 05:00, 19 March 2010
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ...stribution at events: [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.pdf|(pdf)]] [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.odt|(source)]]3 KB (460 words) - 16:08, 23 April 2018
