From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Design Suite]]56 bytes (7 words) - 20:30, 22 August 2013
- 56 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:37, 8 June 2008
- ...isor. It has since been replaced by [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]3 KB (399 words) - 10:35, 3 July 2010
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- [[Category:Packages|bitlbee]]705 bytes (113 words) - 18:01, 25 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Deprecated packages]]33 bytes (3 words) - 12:27, 21 April 2011
- This is a list of the docs packages we need created for each Fedora release, current as of February 2014 (list ...arly in the release cycle. We should only have to go back and ask for more packages on a very infrequent basis.5 KB (586 words) - 02:20, 3 February 2014
- 2 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 21:14, 8 June 2008
- 109 bytes (20 words) - 19:47, 26 May 2021
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rathann/Packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 19:42, 4 June 2008
- These are packages that the [[ISV Special Interest Group]] need reviewers and sponsors for.434 bytes (63 words) - 19:18, 10 December 2008
- 0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 08:56, 26 June 2008
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rdieter/packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 17:25, 26 June 2010
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 06:10, 13 April 2016
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 15:55, 8 August 2014
- ...may wish to avoid them. This list may be an aid to those users. To exclude packages, add their names to an ''exclude'' directive in the ''/etc/yum.conf'' file, Fedora does not ban offensive language in packages.2 KB (239 words) - 11:57, 15 July 2011
- {{OldGuidelinePage|deprecating-packages}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora Packages}}4 KB (550 words) - 19:57, 21 December 2018
- ...elease of what was "OLPC 9.1" into a "Fedora 11 release", and to bring the packages outside of the current Fedora process inside of it. If we can get it done == Packages branched from Mainline ==14 KB (2,085 words) - 12:43, 16 July 2009
- [[Category:Packages|mksh]]966 bytes (160 words) - 19:33, 15 December 2008
- = Fedora Astronomy Packages = ...sed| proposed packages]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Refused| refused packages]] .5 KB (640 words) - 07:15, 1 September 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:52, 10 February 2010
- = Octave Forge Packages = ...es] into F15. (See the [[Packaging:Octave|packaging guidelines for octave packages]])9 KB (1,306 words) - 19:14, 30 August 2011
- 160 bytes (15 words) - 14:15, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.svg (800 × 1,594 (344 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- == Review of Power specific packages == The goal is to review all architecture packages with respect to their need during installer run and during boot. During ins4 KB (655 words) - 15:33, 11 August 2017
- Every release prior to the Feature Freeze we deprecate all packages that [[FTBFS]]. This keeps out software that no longer builds from source, # Detecting a list of FTBFS packages and the dependencies that will be broken if they are removed.5 KB (729 words) - 17:52, 3 November 2015
- ...ode>sendmail-cf</code>, or, more generally, anything that depends on these packages) This list was generated by looking at all the packages in current Core and Extras Rawhide that own a file in <code>/etc/rc.d/init.18 KB (2,663 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 08:58, 30 May 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]45 bytes (6 words) - 12:13, 25 May 2010
- 46 bytes (7 words) - 02:54, 21 December 2008
- 3 KB (237 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- ...f3916e4d76c83ebf8a6b4ff81c4cb05597">Amateur Radio Special Interest Group - Packages</h1> ===Packages now in Fedora===28 KB (3,963 words) - 15:33, 6 February 2022
- Fedora includes a [[Fonts inclusion history|large selection]] of font packages. Unfortunately, due to lack of strong font release conventions, variable pa ...ing ways you can help enhance existing packages, and ways you can tune new packages during creation.3 KB (428 words) - 12:42, 23 March 2011
- #REDIRECT [[Retire Orphaned Packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:04, 30 May 2014
- 2 members (1 subcategory, 0 files) - 21:12, 8 June 2008
- 2 KB (274 words) - 19:15, 29 June 2013
- == Candidate Packages == == Eligible Packages ==4 KB (511 words) - 10:07, 10 April 2024
- 46 bytes (7 words) - 12:07, 2 November 2008
- 5 KB (754 words) - 01:29, 12 August 2018
- ==Proposed Packaging Guidelines for Documentation Packages generated by Publican== '''Proposed:''' Documentation packages be named with the OS version number in the package name to allow parallel i3 KB (421 words) - 19:57, 30 March 2009
- 35 bytes (4 words) - 18:29, 22 June 2010
- ...to a -devel package. See the [[Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages| Devel Packages Guideline]] if you are unclear on what these files are. [19] === Devel Packages ===2 KB (260 words) - 15:52, 5 October 2011
- The following packages ship Flash files. While I haven't gone through all of them, none of them I /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typepadapp/static/soundmanager/soundmanager2.swf10 KB (1,433 words) - 21:38, 1 August 2013
- 35 bytes (4 words) - 20:56, 21 June 2010
- Install yum-utils and issue the following command to see what packages are using package "foo":422 bytes (56 words) - 22:04, 22 February 2009
- = Harden All Packages <!-- The name of your change proposal --> = ...rdened. Beginning with Fedora 23 this will now become the defaults for all packages. You can compare the security by running the following as root:12 KB (1,867 words) - 08:50, 9 January 2019
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- ...zio utente. Al suo posto ora si usa [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]4 KB (451 words) - 08:10, 3 April 2012
- 334 bytes (47 words) - 01:23, 9 March 2015
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png (1,250 × 700 (67 KB)) - 18:02, 6 August 2008- 661 bytes (67 words) - 14:11, 6 December 2013
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
- ...tries, should be opened once a few minor details are sorted and respective packages are updated to current versions '''for review'''.}}2 KB (259 words) - 17:58, 13 May 2012
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.svg (58 KB) - 18:03, 6 August 2008- 936 bytes (95 words) - 14:12, 6 December 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
- == Network configuration packages == There is no uniform way to test the following packages.5 KB (741 words) - 10:42, 14 December 2015
- ...aproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/ orphaned packages]. This keeps out unowned software and prevents future problems down the roa # Retriring packages nobody wants to adopt.3 KB (483 words) - 20:28, 2 October 2021
- * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution * limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution16 KB (2,506 words) - 18:28, 23 June 2020
- = Packages for Embedded Development =4 KB (618 words) - 21:38, 13 December 2010
- 1 KB (133 words) - 14:13, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.png (800 × 1,594 (242 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009File:Lxde-pirut-optional-packages.png Optional packages in LXDE(450 × 348 (136 KB)) - 19:31, 2 September 2008- 91 bytes (9 words) - 06:56, 5 December 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Removing packages SOP]]35 bytes (4 words) - 18:55, 10 June 2009
- 49 bytes (5 words) - 19:01, 14 November 2009
- #REDIRECT [[G11N/vFAD Translation Packages F25]]48 bytes (7 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/No bundling of fonts in other packages (2008-07-24)]]81 bytes (11 words) - 17:50, 7 December 2008
- ...ckert and I'm your teacher for todays IRC classroom lesson on building RPM packages | style="color: #407a40" | any idea why we are building packages after all?63 KB (7,606 words) - 07:57, 18 September 2016
- == Devel Packages == ...must be designed with a logical separation of files. Specifically, -devel packages must be used to contain files which are intended solely for development or4 KB (647 words) - 15:11, 19 October 2011
- ...he <code>rpm-build</code> package installed on your system, as well as the packages normally required for FDP work -- i.e. the "Authoring and Publishing" group5 KB (818 words) - 18:34, 22 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/UnderReview]]57 bytes (6 words) - 20:05, 3 November 2014
- ...on the implementation and the current state of critical path|Critical path packages}} Define a "Critical Path" set of packages that require special care when updating in rawhide and releases.4 KB (649 words) - 14:46, 7 July 2010
- = Fedora Astronomy proposed packages = This is list of packages proposed to be included in Fedora.6 KB (975 words) - 17:41, 15 March 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:Building packages for Docs Project]]56 bytes (7 words) - 17:57, 4 April 2014
- = Packages with Uncommitted F12 Patches = These packages were patched for the F12 Fedora-ARM build, but the patches were not committ18 KB (2,489 words) - 19:50, 30 July 2010
- == Software Packages to Migrate ==21 KB (2,488 words) - 09:44, 26 January 2018
- #REDIRECT [[Improving font packages]]37 bytes (4 words) - 09:43, 11 December 2009
- == Packages already in Fedora repository ==3 KB (446 words) - 14:58, 18 January 2015
- = List of packages monitored for commits by Java SIG =3 KB (141 words) - 18:09, 3 November 2010
- = Fedora Astronomy, refused packages = ...ges already in Fedora]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .2 KB (315 words) - 20:11, 3 November 2014
- == Packages that embed code copies == ...lnerabilities often happen as a result because security sensitive embedded packages may be out of date and have outstanding issues.780 bytes (118 words) - 04:15, 11 November 2010
- == Rejected packages ==124 bytes (16 words) - 05:56, 8 September 2013
- This page lists packages which have been patched to build in Stage 4 of the Fedora AArch64 bootstrap2 KB (292 words) - 19:23, 9 September 2013
- 42 bytes (4 words) - 19:43, 22 August 2013
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Proposed]]52 bytes (6 words) - 19:28, 22 August 2013
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Review]]50 bytes (6 words) - 19:29, 22 August 2013
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Orphaned]]52 bytes (6 words) - 19:30, 22 August 2013
- = Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages = Upon building Python packages containing packaging metadata, RPM will automatically detect the standardiz11 KB (1,789 words) - 08:16, 3 October 2016
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Rejected]]52 bytes (6 words) - 19:34, 22 August 2013
- === Packages under review === ...in request]]. please move it to [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages| accepted packages]],990 bytes (143 words) - 13:57, 18 January 2015
- #REDIRECT [[Upgrade paths — renaming or splitting packages]]62 bytes (7 words) - 17:40, 21 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages under review]]56 bytes (7 words) - 17:50, 21 August 2013
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]3 KB (373 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Changes/Harden All Packages]]41 bytes (5 words) - 13:29, 14 March 2015
- == Fedora Design Packages WishList == Proposed packages to include in Fedora repository for Design Team. When future packager picke3 KB (537 words) - 18:23, 23 August 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archived:G11N/vFAD Translation F25 Packages]]57 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Architectures/AArch64/Bootstrap/Stage4 Problem Packages]]69 bytes (7 words) - 14:43, 6 November 2014
Page text matches
- = Modified packages = == Updated packages ==276 bytes (23 words) - 11:21, 9 January 2009
- === Packages === [[Image:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png|500px|Click to view larger version]]209 bytes (21 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
- * Fedora page (with testing packages): [http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ tsmetana.fedorapeople.org] == Packages ==515 bytes (70 words) - 10:02, 12 March 2009
- An installation using all packages made available by anaconda. This can be accomplished two ways: ...this test is to ensure proper package ordering given a large enough set of packages.600 bytes (82 words) - 17:19, 16 February 2009
- ...only the bits that are not conflicting with KDE3). So lets' see, what KDE4-Packages are ready to compile. | '''Application''' || '''Missing headers etc.''' || '''Upstream packages''' || '''Solution'''861 bytes (128 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Needing Bootstrap = ...ould be rebuilt between Fedora Core revisions. This helps us avoid having packages that are linked against old versions of libraries and fail to compile with872 bytes (143 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- ==Packages To Be Removed== ==Apps To Be Removed From Larger Packages==501 bytes (77 words) - 18:56, 14 June 2010
- MinGW source packages have a circular dependency: == Bootstrap packages ==2 KB (276 words) - 14:54, 24 November 2008
- == Packages == I (co-)maintain the following packages for Fedora:887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
- ...that they are installed rather than Core packages. And when such important packages are replaced it can be ''very'' difficult to remove them.667 bytes (104 words) - 22:48, 2 June 2008
- ...elements are not too big. We may just need one query here to ask for all packages you maintain and own (own is a subset of maintain) sorted by owned and subs ...nd links to their info page. We need a fast query in pkgdb to ask for all packages that is owned by a user and get a count. I don't think the DB was structur1 KB (209 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- == Noarch Packages == ...of arch independent data should be packaged to noarch subpackages. Noarch packages and subpackages must contain the same content no matter on which architectu750 bytes (107 words) - 18:47, 27 January 2009
- === Documentation Packages with Embedded OS versioning === Documentation packages (as approved by the Fedora Documentation Project) can be named with the OS438 bytes (62 words) - 17:42, 31 March 2009
- The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Pa But there are some exceptions for packages in EPEL, which are listed below.1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
- The packages listed below failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after All failed packages with build log were reported in bugzilla on 2005-04-28.550 bytes (81 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- == Packages ==385 bytes (55 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...far. Documentation packages have unique constraints and quirks which other packages do not have.273 bytes (37 words) - 01:24, 1 December 2009
- == Review Requests for Packages I Submitted == == Packages that I am Maintainer or Co-maintainer ==2 KB (321 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016
File:NoarchCandidates.txt List of "source packages: sub packages" that should be convertable to noarch without any work as they do neither c(51 KB) - 10:30, 15 June 2009- To assist packagers in bringing Telepathy-related packages to Fedora and assisting in their continued maintenance by providing timely == Telepathy packages awaiting review ==720 bytes (87 words) - 05:09, 20 August 2008
- == Packages Maintained == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mintojoseph406 bytes (53 words) - 12:46, 2 June 2011
- == Packages I maintain: ==488 bytes (71 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ...eMaintainers]] for details about how packages, including core distribution packages, are now maintained. Please do not refer to Fedora as "Fedora Core" anymore521 bytes (73 words) - 09:51, 11 February 2011
- === Orphaned Packages === * Discussed some issues with orphaned packages:1 KB (151 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- === Guidelines Around Compatibility Packages === == Compatibility Packages ==1 KB (205 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
- == My packages ==919 bytes (140 words) - 22:49, 5 March 2009
- * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
- == Fedora Packages I Maintain/Co-maintain == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/dgoodwin349 bytes (39 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/anishpatil current list in Fedora Pkg Db]574 bytes (81 words) - 13:07, 15 January 2014
- ...'', '''Eclipse''', and '''Apache Tomcat''', as well as other Java software packages included in this release, are compatible with this environment. Refer to this section of the Release Notes for information on installing Java packages:1 KB (201 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- I like Fedora a lot, and I would like to contribute and maintain a lot new of packages to Fedora that are currently unavailable to Fedora Users. ...interested in providing Haskell packages (from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html Hackage Repository]) for the GHC Haskell compiler.670 bytes (97 words) - 19:15, 28 August 2008
- === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===2 KB (248 words) - 09:23, 12 August 2014
- * Orphaned Packages will be droped if no one steps up to maintain them ...a specific date; 2:obsoleted by a newer version; 3: still fc4 as disstag) packages before branching/when FC5 is released1 KB (188 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- * pirut will only be able to install packages listed in comps.xml ...tly should be listed in the comps file (e.g. no devel, libs or perl-module packages=769 bytes (116 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- '''Updating firefox will break the packages listed below for each release, unless they are rebuilt and updates are push ...ageMaintainers/UsefulScripts| ]] to look up and email the owners of those packages. [http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgquery.py ivazquez' pkgquery.py]2 KB (252 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Lacking Extras Bugzilla Components = This is a list of packages which lack Extras Bugzilla Components. If you think it should have an Extr580 bytes (88 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...I'm the unix sysadmin for the Biology department at Duke - so most of the packages I'm working on for Fedora Extras are bioinformatics related somehow. ...of the bioperl and deps and is currently (2007-03-27) pushing the orphaned packages through a re-review process.1 KB (174 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/BasePackages Base Packages] ...raproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/PerLanguageLangpackPackages Per Language Packages]2 KB (189 words) - 06:00, 9 March 2020
- We want to move packages from depending on tomcat5 (and its APIs) to tomcat6. Here are the various P == Packages ==767 bytes (86 words) - 15:17, 16 December 2010
- ...d Hat Linux and other Fedora Extras packages. If you have installed custom packages from other respositories, it is likely that you will run into compatibility ...repositories is to completely avoid publishing packages that somebody else packages. This is obviously not an option because it would be too limiting for the F2 KB (382 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- = Fedora Astronomy, refused packages = ...ges already in Fedora]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .2 KB (315 words) - 20:11, 3 November 2014
- ...bution ISO. These packages were formerly part of the Fedora Extras set of packages:373 bytes (55 words) - 10:15, 14 April 2009
- === Cleaning Old Files and Packages === ...d config files stay in my system. Is there any way to remove theses unused packages and old config files?''2 KB (411 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- * Get all packages built with the new and reduced set of packages installed in the default mock buildroots. ...) packages except large ones containing static content (eg. some game data packages) are expected to be rebuilt. '''Note:''' remember to do "cvs up" in your p4 KB (557 words) - 19:16, 28 May 2008
- * a proper policy to tag packages in CVS that are dead / unused / whatever (like [https://www.redhat.com/arch * create Packaging/MaintaincePolicy which policys or hints how packages should be maintained1 KB (188 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- = Large Data Packages = Large, arch-independent data packages do not need to be recompiled for different Fedora releases. If they were r919 bytes (134 words) - 02:13, 25 February 2009
- This wiki page was created to track progress on the MATE Desktop packages; anyone if free to help with the pending tasks. Takers please pick a task y ...ling to provide a fix, patch or any other improvement for the MATE Desktop packages please go to ''#fedora-mate'' on FreeNode and ask for help on how to get st2 KB (338 words) - 19:56, 21 December 2012
- === Packages under review === ...in request]]. please move it to [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages| accepted packages]],990 bytes (143 words) - 13:57, 18 January 2015
- ...s to invoke system-install-packages whenever they need specific additional packages number of other associated packages must be installed in order for all of the features within the package to2 KB (275 words) - 18:30, 1 August 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI3 KB (368 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
- == Maintainer of the following fedora packages ==419 bytes (55 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- [[Category:Fonts|Packages]] [[Category:Packages|Fonts]]215 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:27, 27 June 2008
- ...e would need are "source-only dkms payload" packages for each module. Such packages would include the necessary kernel module source code and dkms specific con ...believe have the potential for being mainlined. DKMS source-only payload packages could be reviewed on a Fedora release basis to see if active progress has b2 KB (296 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- ...usses the reasons for keeping the "jpp" substring in release tags for Java packages that have been imported from JPackage === ...y: The substring is needed to allow existence of separate stacks of common packages<BR>2 KB (364 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assurance is vital to this effort. == Testing packages ==2 KB (252 words) - 20:03, 6 January 2022
- = Access Control with Fedora Packages = ...ainers. This is the safe default as it ensures that new security-critical packages don't have a window between being set up as a package and having the access1 KB (237 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- * F8(~4400),F9(~5000) packages has built using mock and koji. [http://8ne.sakura.ne.jp:20007/pub/linux/fed * F10(~5700) packages have almost done.2 KB (271 words) - 10:05, 15 January 2009
- === Packages Maintained ===831 bytes (108 words) - 05:24, 26 June 2008
- ...10.0, those new packages will be retagged into dist-f9-perl. The remaining packages will then be rebuilt in dist-f9-perl. Some modules which were previously pa ...ich all of the other perl-related packages needed to rebuild. All of these packages will be built against perl-5.10.0 in dist-f9-perl, to ensure that perl-5.102 KB (333 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===2 KB (262 words) - 12:52, 11 March 2014
- ...ory information attached to them so it is possible for users to browse for packages. Currently, we have the RPM Group tag and comps.xml for this. ...rent people composing package groups may want to include different sets of packages into the groups.4 KB (592 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- == Packages that embed code copies == ...lnerabilities often happen as a result because security sensitive embedded packages may be out of date and have outstanding issues.780 bytes (118 words) - 04:15, 11 November 2010
- ...[ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/rpms-for-exim Exim RPM packages] and a variety of packages on the (now-irrelevant) page http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/rpms.php. More rec Tim is currently maintaining the following packages in Extras:3 KB (393 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- Packages must not contain explicit ''Requires'' on libraries except when absolutely the required packages. Explicit dependencies on specific package names may aid the2 KB (244 words) - 16:49, 22 February 2009
- Packages listed below don't install any desktop related packages (like GUI libraries, ConsoleKit, ...) as dependencies. === Base packages ===932 bytes (106 words) - 12:53, 3 December 2009
- = FE packages no longer available in the FE development repository = This page lists FE packages that appear in the <code>owners.list</code> file but are no longer present2 KB (289 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- I maintain these packages: Retired packages:398 bytes (49 words) - 18:53, 3 September 2008
- ...rojects bundled together in a single package. This applies equally to font packages. Multi-source packages are difficult to maintain and confusing to users. In addition:2 KB (271 words) - 17:35, 26 August 2008
- ...Gilmore| Dennis Gilmore]] has put together a script that can branch your packages. All you need to do is provide the proper input to him. '''Step 1.''' Figure out which packages you want branched.850 bytes (135 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- ...ommon filters for the table (for instance builds will have packages I own, packages I maintain).242 bytes (37 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
- = Packages I maintain = = Packages submitted for review =1 KB (207 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- Fedora 8 includes KDE 4.0 (beta) development libraries. The following new packages are provided: Use these packages to develop, build and run KDE 4 applications within KDE 3 or any other desk2 KB (277 words) - 03:55, 23 January 2009
- [[JohnMahowald/Extras| My packages and wishlist for packages]] * Use alien on all Fedora packages and make dpkg Fedora1 KB (158 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- Make sure all the packages in Fedora have been reviewed. This will include ...that haven't been already reviewed (after the big merge), and catching old packages from fedora.us days where we do not have a review log on file (or no longer867 bytes (129 words) - 20:22, 28 May 2008
- ...is is with your first package up for review. You also can comment on other packages being reviewed.650 bytes (109 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- Scripting installed packages. == Adding Packages ==1,012 bytes (145 words) - 10:05, 2 December 2008
- To bring a broad range of high quality [http://caml.inria.fr Objective CAML] packages to the Fedora project. == Current list of packages ==1 KB (167 words) - 05:41, 16 October 2010
- [[Category:Fonts|Rejected and retired packages]] [[Category:Rejected and retired packages|Fonts]]11 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:28, 27 June 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]3 KB (373 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
- * Build new packages into the proper place * Build new packages into the proper place4 KB (583 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- 1. A CD-Version: The Live-CD should contain most of the basic KDE packages and some of the most powerful applications from outside KDE ...Live-CD adds support for localization and would also bring some additional packages3 KB (377 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- ...e packages you need doesn't work, you can try the repository of just-built packages, adjusting for your architecture as appropriate: === Packages that are done ===3 KB (409 words) - 06:37, 14 September 2009
- ...le to build new kernel-module packages without having to ship new userland packages * working debuginfo packages862 bytes (136 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- == Updated Packages in Fedora {{Template:DocsDict/BeatsVer}} == Updated Packages not generated yet416 bytes (59 words) - 04:15, 23 January 2009
- ...'' format, the preferred format of the GNU project. Since we use many GNU packages, it's best to guarantee that the default buildroot contains /sbin/install-i333 bytes (51 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- Status: '''all packages built, update in updates-testing''' == Core packages ==944 bytes (88 words) - 15:07, 29 March 2011
- Managing Packages: Developing Packages:408 bytes (48 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated2 KB (322 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- ...his FAQ tries to answer some common questions and issues around EPEL7 beta packages and processes. == What packages are available in EPEL7? ==2 KB (296 words) - 08:33, 21 August 2014
- * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated2 KB (322 words) - 20:17, 12 September 2008
- * Status of KDE 4 packages ...mainly due to the parallel-installability issues. We will try to make some packages still using /opt/kde4 available in the meantime.1 KB (140 words) - 13:36, 28 May 2008
- == Lohit packages in Fedora == For Fedora 11 onwards install above packages.2 KB (234 words) - 06:39, 28 January 2015
- * All packages that have dependency issues are removed from the devel repository. * All packages that have Epoch-Version-Release upgrade path problems from previous release1 KB (178 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- == The Selection of Packages from Groups == * From the groups selected, default packages are selected.2 KB (286 words) - 16:19, 15 December 2008
- ...nstall to a hard disk and use it to bootstrap your system and install more packages if required. %packages --nobase445 bytes (68 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated2 KB (324 words) - 20:48, 17 December 2008
- ...e and uses that to indicate that language support is available. So if some packages virtually provides <pkgname>-<langcode> that language will not be considere The current inconsistencies I found are for packages2 KB (248 words) - 09:30, 24 September 2013