From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

  • #REDIRECT [[:Category:Feature profiles]]
    40 bytes (4 words) - 00:45, 30 March 2010
  • The following is a place holder for the F16 feature profiles. ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]].
    761 bytes (111 words) - 05:29, 6 June 2011
  • ...so request that you maintain the same order of sections so that all of the feature pages are uniform. --> <!-- The actual name of your feature page should look something like: Features/YourFeatureName. This keeps all
    9 KB (1,385 words) - 17:28, 17 April 2009
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    1 KB (197 words) - 20:03, 26 October 2010
  • For each feature, the marketing owner should do several things: # Make sure that the feature is reflected on the [[F11_Talking_Points|talking points]].
    2 KB (323 words) - 04:59, 19 March 2010
  • ...on on what feature profiles are and how to make them is available at the [[Feature profiles SOP]].
    18 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 04:57, 19 March 2010
  • For each feature, the marketing owner should do several things: # Make sure that the feature is reflected on the [[Fedora_12_Talking_Points|talking points]].
    2 KB (303 words) - 05:00, 19 March 2010
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    524 bytes (74 words) - 17:35, 26 April 2011
  • 32 bytes (3 words) - 05:26, 13 January 2011
  • 29 bytes (3 words) - 13:55, 21 April 2010
  • 38 bytes (3 words) - 03:41, 11 December 2008
  • File:F13-feature-profiles.pdf
    (373 KB) - 03:14, 3 June 2010
  • File:F13-feature-profiles.odt
    (528 KB) - 03:15, 3 June 2010
  • File:F13-feature-profiles final2.pdf
    Final layout PDF for the F13 Feature Profiles
    (385 KB) - 22:10, 23 June 2010
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ...stribution at events: [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.pdf|(pdf)]] [[Media:F13-feature-profiles.odt|(source)]]
    3 KB (460 words) - 16:08, 23 April 2018
  • = Feature Name = * Name: [[User:Satyak| Satya Komaragiri]]
    7 KB (1,128 words) - 00:54, 12 June 2009
  • * Name: [[User:Rjones| Richard Jones]] We propose to add a feature which allows the host administrator, at their discretion, and only of limit
    4 KB (591 words) - 21:14, 28 March 2015
  • ...lines two complementary ways to slim down FESCo's time commitment with the Feature Process. == Delegate power to drop to the Feature Wrangler ==
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 00:38, 26 September 2014
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
  • File:Feature-process-flow.png
    (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:51, 1 August 2008
  • 35 bytes (4 words) - 21:33, 8 July 2014
  • 4 bytes (1 word) - 19:17, 16 December 2014
  • ...[[:Category:Marketing SOPs|Marketing SOP]] that describes how to create [[Feature profiles]]. You can see examples of past feature profiles at [[:Category:Feature profiles]].
    8 KB (1,392 words) - 09:50, 18 September 2016
  • ...inition]], but here are some questions to ask yourself before engaging the feature process. ...equires a very simple intervention to revert behavior is not necessarily a feature.
    827 bytes (122 words) - 20:37, 8 August 2008
  • ...-Have features missed currently in Nitrate TCMS based on [[Tcms_Comparison|feature comparison table]]. !Feature||Description
    5 KB (684 words) - 05:43, 5 May 2011
  • File:Lxde-feature-sample.png
    (232 × 80 (13 KB)) - 03:50, 9 July 2011
  • 37 bytes (4 words) - 18:11, 22 January 2009
  • The Feature Process has proven itself to be clunky. We need to think about changes to Perhaps the most problematic issue with the Feature Process is that it is really meant to address three separate needs with som
    2 KB (376 words) - 17:18, 22 March 2011
  • ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.
    4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
  • File:F13-feature-profiles)markedup.pdf
    ...d up some proposed changes to layout/formatting on this version of the f13 feature profiles pdf.
    (470 KB) - 16:36, 3 June 2010
  • 82 bytes (8 words) - 20:06, 26 January 2022
  • ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    15 KB (2,111 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
  • 16 KB (2,654 words) - 16:36, 6 December 2012
  • File:Feature-Guide-3.0-Repository-Task1.png
    (646 × 600 (195 KB)) - 03:50, 31 May 2011
  • ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    14 KB (2,240 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
  • ...nalizzata ed approvata, secondo il processo indicato in [[Features/Policy| Feature Policy]]. ...o al report, contenente le informazioni, la dicitura '''Future<code></code>Feature'''.
    15 KB (2,241 words) - 18:12, 21 July 2016
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.png
    Feature process workflow diagram
    (829 × 582 (152 KB)) - 16:37, 2 August 2008
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow2.svg
    Source for feature policy process workflow diagram
    (63 KB) - 16:39, 2 August 2008
  • ...tout en bas à gauche) {{Clickable|File a new bug in the {{Replace|packgage name}} component of the Fedora Product}} (Signaler un nouveau bogue du {{Replace
    20 KB (3,061 words) - 20:21, 18 March 2019
  • #REDIRECT [[Bugs and feature requests]]
    39 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 23 September 2017
  • ...for specific bugs for a package (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package you are checking). ...ect.org/{{Replace|packagename}}] (replace {{Replace|packagename}} with the name of the package). From this point, there are two ways to complete your filli
    16 KB (2,507 words) - 16:33, 7 April 2021
  • ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.
    15 KB (2,120 words) - 12:25, 30 November 2015
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow.png
    (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:52, 1 August 2008
  • 26 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 20:00, 12 May 2022
  • File:Features Policy feature-process-flow.odg
    (15 KB) - 17:55, 1 August 2008

Page text matches

  • This category collects Feature pages with incomplete Scope sections. ...ture. This will help determine what needs to be tested to confirm that the Feature is complete and functioning as expected.
    2 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 03:25, 26 February 2009
  • === Feature Schedule === === I've got this great feature idea! ===
    499 bytes (71 words) - 02:11, 26 November 2008
  • === Feature Schedule === === I've got this great feature idea! ===
    520 bytes (77 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • === Feature Schedule === === I've got this great feature idea! ===
    750 bytes (105 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    524 bytes (74 words) - 17:35, 26 April 2011
  • {{admon/important|Deprecated process|From Fedora 20 the Feature process was replaces by the [[Changes | Planning Process]]! Please, follow ...plate | an empty feature form]] or a [[Features/ExampleFeature | completed feature example]].}}
    2 KB (226 words) - 11:36, 3 June 2013
  • {{admon/important|Deprecated process|DaFedora 20 il Feature process é stato sostituito con il [[Changes | Planning Process]]! Segui le = Feature delle versioni in sviluppo =
    1 KB (148 words) - 23:20, 24 January 2016
  • {{admon/important|Deprecated process|From Fedora 20 the Feature process was replaced by the [[Changes | Planning Process]]! Please, follow Fedora 19 (Schrödinger's Cat) - [[Releases/19/FeatureList | Feature list]]
    1 KB (158 words) - 19:37, 30 March 2015
  • ...on on what feature profiles are and how to make them is available at the [[Feature profiles SOP]].
    18 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 04:57, 19 March 2010
  • The following is a place holder for the F16 feature profiles. ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]].
    761 bytes (111 words) - 05:29, 6 June 2011
  • == Feature Process == # New feature ideas may be added at any time to the wiki
    1 KB (184 words) - 12:09, 11 December 2012
  • A feature will be proposed to FESCo for review by the Feature Wrangler if any of the following occurs: ...85% complete) or not testable at [[ReleaseEngineering/FeatureFreezePolicy| Feature Freeze]]
    1 KB (202 words) - 19:18, 23 September 2009
  • ...ry:FeatureReadyForFesco | sending them to FESCo]] they are reviewed by the Feature Wrangler. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureAnnoun
    6 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:37, 29 January 2013
  • = Fedora Feature Dashboard = {{Admon/note | This page is maintained by the [[JohnPoelstra| Feature Wrangler]] --he gets less confused if he is the only person making changes
    2 KB (233 words) - 09:35, 24 June 2010
  • == Feature: Empathy - [[Features/Empathy]] == FESCo approved Empathy as a Fedora 12 feature by a 7-0 vote.
    633 bytes (84 words) - 08:05, 18 September 2016
  • = Feature Writer = ...st developers and package maintainers with the creation and maintenance of feature pages
    734 bytes (96 words) - 22:27, 14 July 2008
  • Describe the dimensions of tests that this feature is expected to pass when it is done. If it needs to be tested with differe ...sting is OK, but it's much better to document what *I* can do to test your feature.
    1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 03:26, 26 February 2009
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
  • The name of the release is '''Fedora 7''', unlike previous ones which featured 'Core Feature freeze:: All features must be complete in a testable state. Anything that's
    2 KB (234 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • == Feature Testing == ...Test 1. It is useful to test these specific items in the test release the feature was enabled subsequent test releases to make sure there are no regressions.
    974 bytes (130 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ...o requirements by FESCO/FPC. Please submit a new feature proposal for this feature which has been adjusted to meet those requirments and outlines those change
    323 bytes (53 words) - 09:04, 2 April 2020
  • ...nounce mailing list for broader community review. No sooner than one week, feature is sent to [[:Category:FeatureReadyForFesco | FESCo for final approval]]. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF
    1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:36, 29 January 2013
  • ...status is show as a percentage under the ''Current Status'' section of the feature page. ...rcentage completion does not reflect the level of unfixed bugs or that the feature has been fully tested.
    2 KB (336 words) - 15:33, 9 December 2011
  • * finishing the Feature Page '''finishing the Feature Page'''
    871 bytes (114 words) - 16:00, 10 July 2012
  • ...dora community member can introduce a feature, using our [[Features/Policy|feature process]]. === Feature ===
    2 KB (234 words) - 14:08, 18 September 2016
  • == Incomplete feature ==
    193 bytes (18 words) - 15:31, 22 January 2009
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    2 KB (240 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === ...poelcat) is going to send out a reminder to feature owners to update their feature statuses.
    1,022 bytes (136 words) - 23:06, 5 June 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...cepted by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) up until the ''Feature Submission Deadline'': ** Two weeks before the ''Feature Freeze'' milestone.
    2 KB (376 words) - 22:21, 25 September 2014
  • {{Anchor|feature-accept}} === Feature Acceptance ===
    2 KB (310 words) - 23:03, 17 August 2009
  • {{Anchor|feature-proposal}} ...pplicable'' with an explanation) before the Feature Wrangler will submit a feature to FESCo for acceptance.}}
    2 KB (261 words) - 11:20, 9 January 2013
  • = Fedora 10 Feature Policy Review = | This page is to track changes and discussion changes to the Fedora 10 feature process based on our experiences during Fedora 9 development. This is a pub
    2 KB (317 words) - 17:03, 3 July 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    1 KB (184 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • ...sed]] for [[Releases/10| Fedora 10]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:07, 23 February 2009
  • ...sed]] for [[Releases/9| Fedora 9]] that have not been [[Features/Policy#feature-accept| accepted]].
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 18:05, 23 February 2009
  • ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.
    4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
  • === Feature Process === * Long discussion on fixing parts of the Feature Process based on F8 experience. Quick & dirty summary (for more details, p
    1 KB (187 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • === Are "spins" a feature? === === F9 Feature Process ===
    2 KB (204 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • {{Anchor|feature-ideas}} === New Feature Ideas ===
    763 bytes (121 words) - 14:08, 19 September 2010
  • Features in this category have been reviewed by the Feature Wrangler and are ready for an acceptance vote by FESCo * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF
    1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:38, 29 January 2013
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    1 KB (160 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    2 KB (285 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature
    1 KB (197 words) - 20:03, 26 October 2010
  • ...pletely defined. This resulted in last minute surprises when a particular feature that had been advertised as being an important part of the next release was ...se Notes creation for new features--everything needed is on the individual feature pages.
    2 KB (314 words) - 17:19, 15 July 2008
  • <span style="color: gray; "><s>empty, no feature pages</s></span> * <span style="color: gray; "><s>Entertainment - empty and no feature pages.</s></span>
    3 KB (488 words) - 00:13, 28 July 2010
  • == Feature #1 == == Feature #2 ==
    1 KB (145 words) - 20:45, 26 August 2013
  • === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:
    955 bytes (120 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • ...is discussed (Feature owners will need to include e-mail addresses on the feature page).
    1 KB (165 words) - 00:36, 13 November 2008
  • ...e Release Engineering final say in acking spins for a release based on the Feature criteria. If there are disagreements between spins sig/owner they can be e * FESCo approved the following feature for F10:
    2 KB (204 words) - 19:47, 30 July 2008
View (previous 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)