From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Design Suite]]56 bytes (7 words) - 20:30, 22 August 2013
- 56 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:37, 8 June 2008
- {{OldGuidelinePage|deprecating-packages}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora Packages}}4 KB (550 words) - 19:57, 21 December 2018
- ...elease of what was "OLPC 9.1" into a "Fedora 11 release", and to bring the packages outside of the current Fedora process inside of it. If we can get it done == Packages branched from Mainline ==14 KB (2,085 words) - 12:43, 16 July 2009
- [[Category:Packages|mksh]]966 bytes (160 words) - 19:33, 15 December 2008
- ...isor. It has since been replaced by [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]3 KB (399 words) - 10:35, 3 July 2010
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- [[Category:Packages|bitlbee]]705 bytes (113 words) - 18:01, 25 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Deprecated packages]]33 bytes (3 words) - 12:27, 21 April 2011
- This is a list of the docs packages we need created for each Fedora release, current as of February 2014 (list ...arly in the release cycle. We should only have to go back and ask for more packages on a very infrequent basis.5 KB (586 words) - 02:20, 3 February 2014
- 2 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 21:14, 8 June 2008
- 109 bytes (20 words) - 19:47, 26 May 2021
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rathann/Packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 19:42, 4 June 2008
- These are packages that the [[ISV Special Interest Group]] need reviewers and sponsors for.434 bytes (63 words) - 19:18, 10 December 2008
- 0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 08:56, 26 June 2008
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rdieter/packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 17:25, 26 June 2010
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 06:10, 13 April 2016
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 15:55, 8 August 2014
- ...may wish to avoid them. This list may be an aid to those users. To exclude packages, add their names to an ''exclude'' directive in the ''/etc/yum.conf'' file, Fedora does not ban offensive language in packages.2 KB (239 words) - 11:57, 15 July 2011
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png (1,250 × 700 (67 KB)) - 18:02, 6 August 2008- 661 bytes (67 words) - 14:11, 6 December 2013
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
- ...tries, should be opened once a few minor details are sorted and respective packages are updated to current versions '''for review'''.}}2 KB (259 words) - 17:58, 13 May 2012
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.svg (58 KB) - 18:03, 6 August 2008- 936 bytes (95 words) - 14:12, 6 December 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
- == Network configuration packages == There is no uniform way to test the following packages.5 KB (741 words) - 10:42, 14 December 2015
- ...aproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/ orphaned packages]. This keeps out unowned software and prevents future problems down the roa # Retriring packages nobody wants to adopt.3 KB (483 words) - 20:28, 2 October 2021
- * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution * limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution16 KB (2,506 words) - 18:28, 23 June 2020
- = Packages for Embedded Development =4 KB (618 words) - 21:38, 13 December 2010
- 1 KB (133 words) - 14:13, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.png (800 × 1,594 (242 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- = Fedora Astronomy Packages = ...sed| proposed packages]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Refused| refused packages]] .5 KB (640 words) - 07:15, 1 September 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:52, 10 February 2010
- = Octave Forge Packages = ...es] into F15. (See the [[Packaging:Octave|packaging guidelines for octave packages]])9 KB (1,306 words) - 19:14, 30 August 2011
- 160 bytes (15 words) - 14:15, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.svg (800 × 1,594 (344 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- == Review of Power specific packages == The goal is to review all architecture packages with respect to their need during installer run and during boot. During ins4 KB (655 words) - 15:33, 11 August 2017
- Every release prior to the Feature Freeze we deprecate all packages that [[FTBFS]]. This keeps out software that no longer builds from source, # Detecting a list of FTBFS packages and the dependencies that will be broken if they are removed.5 KB (729 words) - 17:52, 3 November 2015
- ...ode>sendmail-cf</code>, or, more generally, anything that depends on these packages) This list was generated by looking at all the packages in current Core and Extras Rawhide that own a file in <code>/etc/rc.d/init.18 KB (2,663 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 08:58, 30 May 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]45 bytes (6 words) - 12:13, 25 May 2010
- 46 bytes (7 words) - 02:54, 21 December 2008
- 3 KB (237 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- ...f3916e4d76c83ebf8a6b4ff81c4cb05597">Amateur Radio Special Interest Group - Packages</h1> ===Packages now in Fedora===28 KB (3,963 words) - 15:33, 6 February 2022
- Fedora includes a [[Fonts inclusion history|large selection]] of font packages. Unfortunately, due to lack of strong font release conventions, variable pa ...ing ways you can help enhance existing packages, and ways you can tune new packages during creation.3 KB (428 words) - 12:42, 23 March 2011
- #REDIRECT [[Retire Orphaned Packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:04, 30 May 2014
- 2 members (1 subcategory, 0 files) - 21:12, 8 June 2008
- 2 KB (274 words) - 19:15, 29 June 2013
- == Candidate Packages == == Eligible Packages ==4 KB (511 words) - 10:07, 10 April 2024
Page text matches
- = Modified packages = == Updated packages ==276 bytes (23 words) - 11:21, 9 January 2009
- === Packages === [[Image:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png|500px|Click to view larger version]]209 bytes (21 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
- * Fedora page (with testing packages): [http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ tsmetana.fedorapeople.org] == Packages ==515 bytes (70 words) - 10:02, 12 March 2009
- An installation using all packages made available by anaconda. This can be accomplished two ways: ...this test is to ensure proper package ordering given a large enough set of packages.600 bytes (82 words) - 17:19, 16 February 2009
- ...only the bits that are not conflicting with KDE3). So lets' see, what KDE4-Packages are ready to compile. | '''Application''' || '''Missing headers etc.''' || '''Upstream packages''' || '''Solution'''861 bytes (128 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Needing Bootstrap = ...ould be rebuilt between Fedora Core revisions. This helps us avoid having packages that are linked against old versions of libraries and fail to compile with872 bytes (143 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- ==Packages To Be Removed== ==Apps To Be Removed From Larger Packages==501 bytes (77 words) - 18:56, 14 June 2010
- MinGW source packages have a circular dependency: == Bootstrap packages ==2 KB (276 words) - 14:54, 24 November 2008
- == Packages == I (co-)maintain the following packages for Fedora:887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
- ...that they are installed rather than Core packages. And when such important packages are replaced it can be ''very'' difficult to remove them.667 bytes (104 words) - 22:48, 2 June 2008
- ...elements are not too big. We may just need one query here to ask for all packages you maintain and own (own is a subset of maintain) sorted by owned and subs ...nd links to their info page. We need a fast query in pkgdb to ask for all packages that is owned by a user and get a count. I don't think the DB was structur1 KB (209 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- == Noarch Packages == ...of arch independent data should be packaged to noarch subpackages. Noarch packages and subpackages must contain the same content no matter on which architectu750 bytes (107 words) - 18:47, 27 January 2009
- === Documentation Packages with Embedded OS versioning === Documentation packages (as approved by the Fedora Documentation Project) can be named with the OS438 bytes (62 words) - 17:42, 31 March 2009
- The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Pa But there are some exceptions for packages in EPEL, which are listed below.1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
- The packages listed below failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after All failed packages with build log were reported in bugzilla on 2005-04-28.550 bytes (81 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- == Packages ==385 bytes (55 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...far. Documentation packages have unique constraints and quirks which other packages do not have.273 bytes (37 words) - 01:24, 1 December 2009
- == Review Requests for Packages I Submitted == == Packages that I am Maintainer or Co-maintainer ==2 KB (321 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016
File:NoarchCandidates.txt List of "source packages: sub packages" that should be convertable to noarch without any work as they do neither c(51 KB) - 10:30, 15 June 2009- To assist packagers in bringing Telepathy-related packages to Fedora and assisting in their continued maintenance by providing timely == Telepathy packages awaiting review ==720 bytes (87 words) - 05:09, 20 August 2008
- == Packages Maintained == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mintojoseph406 bytes (53 words) - 12:46, 2 June 2011
- == Packages I maintain: ==488 bytes (71 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ...eMaintainers]] for details about how packages, including core distribution packages, are now maintained. Please do not refer to Fedora as "Fedora Core" anymore521 bytes (73 words) - 09:51, 11 February 2011
- === Orphaned Packages === * Discussed some issues with orphaned packages:1 KB (151 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- === Guidelines Around Compatibility Packages === == Compatibility Packages ==1 KB (205 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
- == My packages ==919 bytes (140 words) - 22:49, 5 March 2009
- * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
- == Fedora Packages I Maintain/Co-maintain == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/dgoodwin349 bytes (39 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/anishpatil current list in Fedora Pkg Db]574 bytes (81 words) - 13:07, 15 January 2014
- ...'', '''Eclipse''', and '''Apache Tomcat''', as well as other Java software packages included in this release, are compatible with this environment. Refer to this section of the Release Notes for information on installing Java packages:1 KB (201 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- I like Fedora a lot, and I would like to contribute and maintain a lot new of packages to Fedora that are currently unavailable to Fedora Users. ...interested in providing Haskell packages (from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html Hackage Repository]) for the GHC Haskell compiler.670 bytes (97 words) - 19:15, 28 August 2008
- === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===2 KB (248 words) - 09:23, 12 August 2014
- * Orphaned Packages will be droped if no one steps up to maintain them ...a specific date; 2:obsoleted by a newer version; 3: still fc4 as disstag) packages before branching/when FC5 is released1 KB (188 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- * pirut will only be able to install packages listed in comps.xml ...tly should be listed in the comps file (e.g. no devel, libs or perl-module packages=769 bytes (116 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- '''Updating firefox will break the packages listed below for each release, unless they are rebuilt and updates are push ...ageMaintainers/UsefulScripts| ]] to look up and email the owners of those packages. [http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgquery.py ivazquez' pkgquery.py]2 KB (252 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Lacking Extras Bugzilla Components = This is a list of packages which lack Extras Bugzilla Components. If you think it should have an Extr580 bytes (88 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...I'm the unix sysadmin for the Biology department at Duke - so most of the packages I'm working on for Fedora Extras are bioinformatics related somehow. ...of the bioperl and deps and is currently (2007-03-27) pushing the orphaned packages through a re-review process.1 KB (174 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/BasePackages Base Packages] ...raproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/PerLanguageLangpackPackages Per Language Packages]2 KB (189 words) - 06:00, 9 March 2020
- We want to move packages from depending on tomcat5 (and its APIs) to tomcat6. Here are the various P == Packages ==767 bytes (86 words) - 15:17, 16 December 2010
- ...d Hat Linux and other Fedora Extras packages. If you have installed custom packages from other respositories, it is likely that you will run into compatibility ...repositories is to completely avoid publishing packages that somebody else packages. This is obviously not an option because it would be too limiting for the F2 KB (382 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- = Fedora Astronomy, refused packages = ...ges already in Fedora]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .2 KB (315 words) - 20:11, 3 November 2014
- ...bution ISO. These packages were formerly part of the Fedora Extras set of packages:373 bytes (55 words) - 10:15, 14 April 2009
- === Cleaning Old Files and Packages === ...d config files stay in my system. Is there any way to remove theses unused packages and old config files?''2 KB (411 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- * Get all packages built with the new and reduced set of packages installed in the default mock buildroots. ...) packages except large ones containing static content (eg. some game data packages) are expected to be rebuilt. '''Note:''' remember to do "cvs up" in your p4 KB (557 words) - 19:16, 28 May 2008
- * a proper policy to tag packages in CVS that are dead / unused / whatever (like [https://www.redhat.com/arch * create Packaging/MaintaincePolicy which policys or hints how packages should be maintained1 KB (188 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- = Large Data Packages = Large, arch-independent data packages do not need to be recompiled for different Fedora releases. If they were r919 bytes (134 words) - 02:13, 25 February 2009
- This wiki page was created to track progress on the MATE Desktop packages; anyone if free to help with the pending tasks. Takers please pick a task y ...ling to provide a fix, patch or any other improvement for the MATE Desktop packages please go to ''#fedora-mate'' on FreeNode and ask for help on how to get st2 KB (338 words) - 19:56, 21 December 2012