From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • = Modified packages = == Updated packages ==
    276 bytes (23 words) - 11:21, 9 January 2009
  • === Packages === [[Image:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png|500px|Click to view larger version]]
    209 bytes (21 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
  • * Fedora page (with testing packages): [http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ tsmetana.fedorapeople.org] == Packages ==
    515 bytes (70 words) - 10:02, 12 March 2009
  • An installation using all packages made available by anaconda. This can be accomplished two ways: ...this test is to ensure proper package ordering given a large enough set of packages.
    600 bytes (82 words) - 17:19, 16 February 2009
  • ...only the bits that are not conflicting with KDE3). So lets' see, what KDE4-Packages are ready to compile. | '''Application''' || '''Missing headers etc.''' || '''Upstream packages''' || '''Solution'''
    861 bytes (128 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • = Packages Needing Bootstrap = ...ould be rebuilt between Fedora Core revisions. This helps us avoid having packages that are linked against old versions of libraries and fail to compile with
    872 bytes (143 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash
    568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
  • ==Packages To Be Removed== ==Apps To Be Removed From Larger Packages==
    501 bytes (77 words) - 18:56, 14 June 2010
  • MinGW source packages have a circular dependency: == Bootstrap packages ==
    2 KB (276 words) - 14:54, 24 November 2008
  • == Packages == I (co-)maintain the following packages for Fedora:
    887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
  • ...that they are installed rather than Core packages. And when such important packages are replaced it can be ''very'' difficult to remove them.
    667 bytes (104 words) - 22:48, 2 June 2008
  • ...elements are not too big. We may just need one query here to ask for all packages you maintain and own (own is a subset of maintain) sorted by owned and subs ...nd links to their info page. We need a fast query in pkgdb to ask for all packages that is owned by a user and get a count. I don't think the DB was structur
    1 KB (209 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
  • == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG
    317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • == Noarch Packages == ...of arch independent data should be packaged to noarch subpackages. Noarch packages and subpackages must contain the same content no matter on which architectu
    750 bytes (107 words) - 18:47, 27 January 2009
  • === Documentation Packages with Embedded OS versioning === Documentation packages (as approved by the Fedora Documentation Project) can be named with the OS
    438 bytes (62 words) - 17:42, 31 March 2009
  • The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Pa But there are some exceptions for packages in EPEL, which are listed below.
    1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
  • The packages listed below failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after All failed packages with build log were reported in bugzilla on 2005-04-28.
    550 bytes (81 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages ==
    385 bytes (55 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...far. Documentation packages have unique constraints and quirks which other packages do not have.
    273 bytes (37 words) - 01:24, 1 December 2009
  • == Review Requests for Packages I Submitted == == Packages that I am Maintainer or Co-maintainer ==
    2 KB (321 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016
  • File:NoarchCandidates.txt
    List of "source packages: sub packages" that should be convertable to noarch without any work as they do neither c
    (51 KB) - 10:30, 15 June 2009
  • To assist packagers in bringing Telepathy-related packages to Fedora and assisting in their continued maintenance by providing timely == Telepathy packages awaiting review ==
    720 bytes (87 words) - 05:09, 20 August 2008
  • == Packages Maintained == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mintojoseph
    406 bytes (53 words) - 12:46, 2 June 2011
  • == Packages I maintain: ==
    488 bytes (71 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ...eMaintainers]] for details about how packages, including core distribution packages, are now maintained. Please do not refer to Fedora as "Fedora Core" anymore
    521 bytes (73 words) - 09:51, 11 February 2011
  • === Orphaned Packages === * Discussed some issues with orphaned packages:
    1 KB (151 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • === Guidelines Around Compatibility Packages === == Compatibility Packages ==
    1 KB (205 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]
    2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
  • == My packages ==
    919 bytes (140 words) - 22:49, 5 March 2009
  • * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==
    930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • == Fedora Packages I Maintain/Co-maintain == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/dgoodwin
    349 bytes (39 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/anishpatil current list in Fedora Pkg Db]
    574 bytes (81 words) - 13:07, 15 January 2014
  • ...'', '''Eclipse''', and '''Apache Tomcat''', as well as other Java software packages included in this release, are compatible with this environment. Refer to this section of the Release Notes for information on installing Java packages:
    1 KB (201 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • I like Fedora a lot, and I would like to contribute and maintain a lot new of packages to Fedora that are currently unavailable to Fedora Users. ...interested in providing Haskell packages (from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html Hackage Repository]) for the GHC Haskell compiler.
    670 bytes (97 words) - 19:15, 28 August 2008
  • === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===
    2 KB (248 words) - 09:23, 12 August 2014
  • * Orphaned Packages will be droped if no one steps up to maintain them ...a specific date; 2:obsoleted by a newer version; 3: still fc4 as disstag) packages before branching/when FC5 is released
    1 KB (188 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • * pirut will only be able to install packages listed in comps.xml ...tly should be listed in the comps file (e.g. no devel, libs or perl-module packages=
    769 bytes (116 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • '''Updating firefox will break the packages listed below for each release, unless they are rebuilt and updates are push ...ageMaintainers/UsefulScripts| ]] to look up and email the owners of those packages. [http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgquery.py ivazquez' pkgquery.py]
    2 KB (252 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • = Packages Lacking Extras Bugzilla Components = This is a list of packages which lack Extras Bugzilla Components. If you think it should have an Extr
    580 bytes (88 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...I'm the unix sysadmin for the Biology department at Duke - so most of the packages I'm working on for Fedora Extras are bioinformatics related somehow. ...of the bioperl and deps and is currently (2007-03-27) pushing the orphaned packages through a re-review process.
    1 KB (174 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/BasePackages Base Packages] ...raproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/PerLanguageLangpackPackages Per Language Packages]
    2 KB (189 words) - 06:00, 9 March 2020
  • We want to move packages from depending on tomcat5 (and its APIs) to tomcat6. Here are the various P == Packages ==
    767 bytes (86 words) - 15:17, 16 December 2010
  • ...d Hat Linux and other Fedora Extras packages. If you have installed custom packages from other respositories, it is likely that you will run into compatibility ...repositories is to completely avoid publishing packages that somebody else packages. This is obviously not an option because it would be too limiting for the F
    2 KB (382 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • = Fedora Astronomy, refused packages = ...ges already in Fedora]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .
    2 KB (315 words) - 20:11, 3 November 2014
  • ...bution ISO. These packages were formerly part of the Fedora Extras set of packages:
    373 bytes (55 words) - 10:15, 14 April 2009
  • === Cleaning Old Files and Packages === ...d config files stay in my system. Is there any way to remove theses unused packages and old config files?''
    2 KB (411 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • * Get all packages built with the new and reduced set of packages installed in the default mock buildroots. ...) packages except large ones containing static content (eg. some game data packages) are expected to be rebuilt. '''Note:''' remember to do "cvs up" in your p
    4 KB (557 words) - 19:16, 28 May 2008
  • * a proper policy to tag packages in CVS that are dead / unused / whatever (like [https://www.redhat.com/arch * create Packaging/MaintaincePolicy which policys or hints how packages should be maintained
    1 KB (188 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • = Large Data Packages = Large, arch-independent data packages do not need to be recompiled for different Fedora releases. If they were r
    919 bytes (134 words) - 02:13, 25 February 2009
  • This wiki page was created to track progress on the MATE Desktop packages; anyone if free to help with the pending tasks. Takers please pick a task y ...ling to provide a fix, patch or any other improvement for the MATE Desktop packages please go to ''#fedora-mate'' on FreeNode and ask for help on how to get st
    2 KB (338 words) - 19:56, 21 December 2012
  • === Packages under review === ...in request]]. please move it to [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages| accepted packages]],
    990 bytes (143 words) - 13:57, 18 January 2015
  • ...s to invoke system-install-packages whenever they need specific additional packages number of other associated packages must be installed in order for all of the features within the package to
    2 KB (275 words) - 18:30, 1 August 2008
  • List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI
    3 KB (368 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
  • == Maintainer of the following fedora packages ==
    419 bytes (55 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • [[Category:Fonts|Packages]] [[Category:Packages|Fonts]]
    215 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:27, 27 June 2008
  • ...e would need are "source-only dkms payload" packages for each module. Such packages would include the necessary kernel module source code and dkms specific con ...believe have the potential for being mainlined. DKMS source-only payload packages could be reviewed on a Fedora release basis to see if active progress has b
    2 KB (296 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...usses the reasons for keeping the "jpp" substring in release tags for Java packages that have been imported from JPackage === ...y: The substring is needed to allow existence of separate stacks of common packages<BR>
    2 KB (364 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assurance is vital to this effort. == Testing packages ==
    2 KB (252 words) - 20:03, 6 January 2022
  • = Access Control with Fedora Packages = ...ainers. This is the safe default as it ensures that new security-critical packages don't have a window between being set up as a package and having the access
    1 KB (237 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • * F8(~4400),F9(~5000) packages has built using mock and koji. [http://8ne.sakura.ne.jp:20007/pub/linux/fed * F10(~5700) packages have almost done.
    2 KB (271 words) - 10:05, 15 January 2009
  • === Packages Maintained ===
    831 bytes (108 words) - 05:24, 26 June 2008
  • ...10.0, those new packages will be retagged into dist-f9-perl. The remaining packages will then be rebuilt in dist-f9-perl. Some modules which were previously pa ...ich all of the other perl-related packages needed to rebuild. All of these packages will be built against perl-5.10.0 in dist-f9-perl, to ensure that perl-5.10
    2 KB (333 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===
    2 KB (262 words) - 12:52, 11 March 2014
  • ...ory information attached to them so it is possible for users to browse for packages. Currently, we have the RPM Group tag and comps.xml for this. ...rent people composing package groups may want to include different sets of packages into the groups.
    4 KB (592 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages that embed code copies == ...lnerabilities often happen as a result because security sensitive embedded packages may be out of date and have outstanding issues.
    780 bytes (118 words) - 04:15, 11 November 2010
  • ...[ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/rpms-for-exim Exim RPM packages] and a variety of packages on the (now-irrelevant) page http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/rpms.php. More rec Tim is currently maintaining the following packages in Extras:
    3 KB (393 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • Packages must not contain explicit ''Requires'' on libraries except when absolutely the required packages. Explicit dependencies on specific package names may aid the
    2 KB (244 words) - 16:49, 22 February 2009
  • Packages listed below don't install any desktop related packages (like GUI libraries, ConsoleKit, ...) as dependencies. === Base packages ===
    932 bytes (106 words) - 12:53, 3 December 2009
  • = FE packages no longer available in the FE development repository = This page lists FE packages that appear in the <code>owners.list</code> file but are no longer present
    2 KB (289 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • I maintain these packages: Retired packages:
    398 bytes (49 words) - 18:53, 3 September 2008
  • ...rojects bundled together in a single package. This applies equally to font packages. Multi-source packages are difficult to maintain and confusing to users. In addition:
    2 KB (271 words) - 17:35, 26 August 2008
  • ...Gilmore| Dennis Gilmore]] has put together a script that can branch your packages. All you need to do is provide the proper input to him. '''Step 1.''' Figure out which packages you want branched.
    850 bytes (135 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...ommon filters for the table (for instance builds will have packages I own, packages I maintain).
    242 bytes (37 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
  • = Packages I maintain = = Packages submitted for review =
    1 KB (207 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • Fedora 8 includes KDE 4.0 (beta) development libraries. The following new packages are provided: Use these packages to develop, build and run KDE 4 applications within KDE 3 or any other desk
    2 KB (277 words) - 03:55, 23 January 2009
  • [[JohnMahowald/Extras| My packages and wishlist for packages]] * Use alien on all Fedora packages and make dpkg Fedora
    1 KB (158 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • Make sure all the packages in Fedora have been reviewed. This will include ...that haven't been already reviewed (after the big merge), and catching old packages from fedora.us days where we do not have a review log on file (or no longer
    867 bytes (129 words) - 20:22, 28 May 2008
  • ...is is with your first package up for review. You also can comment on other packages being reviewed.
    650 bytes (109 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • Scripting installed packages. == Adding Packages ==
    1,012 bytes (145 words) - 10:05, 2 December 2008
  • To bring a broad range of high quality [http://caml.inria.fr Objective CAML] packages to the Fedora project. == Current list of packages ==
    1 KB (167 words) - 05:41, 16 October 2010
  • [[Category:Fonts|Rejected and retired packages]] [[Category:Rejected and retired packages|Fonts]]
    11 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:28, 27 June 2008
  • List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]
    3 KB (373 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
  • * Build new packages into the proper place * Build new packages into the proper place
    4 KB (583 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • 1. A CD-Version: The Live-CD should contain most of the basic KDE packages and some of the most powerful applications from outside KDE ...Live-CD adds support for localization and would also bring some additional packages
    3 KB (377 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • ...e packages you need doesn't work, you can try the repository of just-built packages, adjusting for your architecture as appropriate: === Packages that are done ===
    3 KB (409 words) - 06:37, 14 September 2009
  • ...le to build new kernel-module packages without having to ship new userland packages * working debuginfo packages
    862 bytes (136 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • == Updated Packages in Fedora {{Template:DocsDict/BeatsVer}} == Updated Packages not generated yet
    416 bytes (59 words) - 04:15, 23 January 2009
  • ...'' format, the preferred format of the GNU project. Since we use many GNU packages, it's best to guarantee that the default buildroot contains /sbin/install-i
    333 bytes (51 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • Status: '''all packages built, update in updates-testing''' == Core packages ==
    944 bytes (88 words) - 15:07, 29 March 2011
  • Managing Packages: Developing Packages:
    408 bytes (48 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated
    2 KB (322 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...his FAQ tries to answer some common questions and issues around EPEL7 beta packages and processes. == What packages are available in EPEL7? ==
    2 KB (296 words) - 08:33, 21 August 2014
  • * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated
    2 KB (322 words) - 20:17, 12 September 2008
  • * Status of KDE 4 packages ...mainly due to the parallel-installability issues. We will try to make some packages still using /opt/kde4 available in the meantime.
    1 KB (140 words) - 13:36, 28 May 2008
  • == Lohit packages in Fedora == For Fedora 11 onwards install above packages.
    2 KB (234 words) - 06:39, 28 January 2015
  • * All packages that have dependency issues are removed from the devel repository. * All packages that have Epoch-Version-Release upgrade path problems from previous release
    1 KB (178 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == The Selection of Packages from Groups == * From the groups selected, default packages are selected.
    2 KB (286 words) - 16:19, 15 December 2008
  • ...nstall to a hard disk and use it to bootstrap your system and install more packages if required. %packages --nobase
    445 bytes (68 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated
    2 KB (324 words) - 20:48, 17 December 2008
  • ...e and uses that to indicate that language support is available. So if some packages virtually provides <pkgname>-<langcode> that language will not be considere The current inconsistencies I found are for packages
    2 KB (248 words) - 09:30, 24 September 2013
  • = A proposal to add several packages to the Exception List = I believe the following packages should be present in every buildroot for any Fedora package:
    2 KB (384 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages == I maintain the following packages in Fedora:
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • * start/finish reviews of any new kde4 modules/packages (e.g., kde-l10n, extragear stuff) - DONE * check all packages if defined packages in "Requires" are enough - DONE
    6 KB (791 words) - 19:19, 3 June 2008
  • ...server also mirrors the Fedora Core (and Red Hat Linux) base distribution packages. It does this mostly for users of [https://moin.conectiva.com.br/AptRpm APT |<|1>'''Extra Packages'''||'''extras'''||Additional packages not in the base distribution
    4 KB (536 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • As part of this change, we removed support for the X11 session in KDE Plasma packages in Fedora 40. Thus, the KDE SIG created a COPR of those KDE Plasma packages that tracks our packages in Fedora and rebuilds them with the X11 session subpackages automatically:
    888 bytes (142 words) - 19:13, 29 January 2024
  • === Cut-off date for new packages requests in older branches === * FESCo decided the cut-off for new F-(X-2) packages is when F-X goes gold. (For example, new F8 package requests will not be ac
    1 KB (153 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • == 5. Searching for Packages with yum == ...n your system. Searches automatically include both installed and available packages.
    3 KB (528 words) - 01:14, 4 March 2009
  • .NET Core and other related packages in the standard Fedora repositories are mainted by the [[SIGs/DotNet|DotNet == References and packages ==
    2 KB (258 words) - 21:59, 26 April 2024
  • === Orphaned Packages ===
    899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • * I'm mostly interested in java, lisp and audio creation packages for Fedora. ...the packages I help maintain: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/green
    837 bytes (116 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • I maintain quite a few packages, see the package database for the complete list: * [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/hubbitus?acls=owner Packages owned]
    2 KB (238 words) - 11:34, 9 May 2017
  • ...pypi PyPI] compatible server that we can use to mirror a restricted set of packages and their versions from the root PyPI server. A DevPI server can have multi == Indexes and packages ==
    3 KB (465 words) - 17:33, 19 March 2015
  • === Default commit acl for new packages === * After a long discussion, FESCo approved a proposal the new packages will be created with an default acl that is open to all cvsextras members,
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. ...ages, which contain an update to devhelp built against the updated Firefox packages.
    3 KB (461 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Users of yelp are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages, which contain
    3 KB (427 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • Currently all MinGW packages are development packages, and so there is no package/package-devel split. Should we do this or is i ...hen it wouldn't it be better to create -static and -devel pacakges for all packages (like in native version) and put
    2 KB (235 words) - 19:31, 19 May 2011
  • * All packages could use a build test (generally on rawhide if it's not broken) and rpmlin ...esh build test under rawhide anyway as there's plenty of potential for old packages to fail to build in rawhide, especially after things like gcc updates.
    1 KB (248 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • * KDE 4 Beta 2 Packages ...mmary of the work done by KevinKofler on the KDE 4 development environment packages:
    575 bytes (65 words) - 13:37, 28 May 2008
  • ...a.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150222 Blocker bugs] , bugfixes, and packages leading up to gnome 2.14 will be allowed into the tree, however feature imp Packages should be built into the dist-fc5-HEAD collection instance. To move a pack
    956 bytes (147 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • If two or more packages provide a common set If you have a collection of packages which provide a common set
    2 KB (248 words) - 18:06, 5 August 2009
  • == Maintaining Packages == Package Maintainers update, fix bugs and improve packages in the EPEL collection. See the [[EPEL_Package_Maintainers|EPEL Package Mai
    2 KB (269 words) - 19:55, 6 January 2022
  • ...le version of most interpreters (python, perl, php, etc). The application packages we build all target this version. However, the end user may install other .../bin/python</code> as there's no ambiguitiy in which version of python the packages will invoke. When we use <code>#! /usr/bin/env python</code> in the sheban
    2 KB (311 words) - 14:06, 31 August 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[:Category:Packages]]
    32 bytes (3 words) - 13:09, 9 June 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Removing packages SOP]]
    35 bytes (4 words) - 18:57, 10 June 2009
  • File:F14-ghc-libs-deps.svg
    F14 ghc packages dependency graph
    (4,176 × 505 (57 KB)) - 02:01, 19 October 2011
  • #REDIRECT [[Changes/Harden All Packages]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 13:29, 14 March 2015
  • #REDIRECT [[Retired packages]]
    30 bytes (3 words) - 22:02, 22 February 2009
  • = Base Packages Overview =
    26 bytes (3 words) - 11:40, 3 December 2009
  • File:Lxde-pirut-optional-packages.png
    Optional packages in LXDE
    (450 × 348 (136 KB)) - 19:31, 2 September 2008
  • * Xnest (for testing graphical packages) == Testing non-graphical packages with mock ==
    2 KB (325 words) - 15:31, 30 March 2017
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. ...ages, which contain an update to devhelp built against the updated Firefox packages.
    3 KB (467 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • Treat Packages as new packages and have a full Review. Followed by marking the old package dead in cvs an Packages are sometimes renamed, either by upstream action or locally in the collecti
    2 KB (276 words) - 22:51, 26 January 2009
  • === Dead packages ===
    673 bytes (99 words) - 13:11, 19 May 2011
  • ...will document in the wiki that FE branches in maintenance mode use Legacy packages (thl: was done in mid-september afaik) packages
    555 bytes (75 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...here interested parties gather on irc and review a number of Fedora Extras packages that are awaiting review. * People seeking reviews for packages can join and drum up interest in their package to get it reviewed.
    2 KB (393 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Retire Orphaned Packages]]
    38 bytes (4 words) - 09:04, 30 May 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[Who is allowed to modify which packages]]
    53 bytes (8 words) - 22:01, 22 February 2009
  • = List of modified packages =
    29 bytes (4 words) - 09:56, 15 July 2009
  • = Modified Fedora packages =
    38 bytes (4 words) - 14:09, 11 January 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Tracking downstream packages]]
    42 bytes (4 words) - 22:04, 22 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]
    38 bytes (4 words) - 08:58, 30 May 2014
  • ...computes dependencies and figures out what things should occur to install packages. yum makes it easier to maintain groups of machines without having to manua ...ory by default, but you can also configure it to use a local repository of packages.
    1 KB (196 words) - 01:54, 26 August 2016
  • ...se<ref>Print, screen, headings, code…</ref> to help users choose the right packages to install. Also, it is considered good form to credit the original font de ...n_typefaces19th.html Greek Font Society web site]. This is what other font packages should strive to emulate.
    877 bytes (129 words) - 12:06, 22 February 2009
  • '''Pirut''' starts in ''Browse'' view by default. This view organizes packages into related groups, displaying top level groups on the left and sub-catego ...le, select the ''Sound and Video'' sub-category and press the '''[Optional Packages] ''' button. Locate '''Banshee''' in the list and queue it for installation
    4 KB (600 words) - 23:22, 2 June 2008
  • * To build all Zope related productive packages for each release of Fedora and EL. == Prominent Packages ==
    2 KB (346 words) - 09:48, 20 September 2010
  • ...proved by FESCo and begun to remove the dependency on net-tools within the packages in Fedora. There has already been a good start on this with several packages either already engaging upstream discussions or with adjustments made to re
    2 KB (251 words) - 09:28, 26 October 2017
  • File:Dependency-graph.png
    Dependency Graph of Zope Packages
    (1,385 × 749 (151 KB)) - 09:50, 20 September 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Policy for encouraging comaintainers of packages]]
    62 bytes (7 words) - 21:59, 22 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]
    48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
  • File:Rpmfusion packages.jpg
    RPM fusion packages needed when installing CUDA
    (945 × 421 (95 KB)) - 20:34, 6 October 2012
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]
    45 bytes (6 words) - 15:28, 15 June 2010
  • === List of Haskell Packages I have created for Fedora ===
    58 bytes (9 words) - 19:19, 28 August 2008
  • ...s/PackageChanges/UpdatedPackages. You can also find a comparison of major packages between all Fedora versions at http://distrowatch.com/fedora.
    1 KB (170 words) - 22:45, 25 February 2009
  • ** graphviz, python packages {{admon/important| This Package installs GUI and X related packages as dependencies}}
    571 bytes (71 words) - 11:53, 3 December 2009
  • ...hat the 'server list'. That list is tracked [[Releases/FeatureFedoraServer/Packages| here]] ...>sendmail-cf</code> etc. by querying for the dependants of the server list packages.
    2 KB (381 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • == Included packages ==
    938 bytes (110 words) - 19:33, 3 February 2015
  • ==== Special Packages: ==== ==== Special Packages: ====
    4 KB (495 words) - 02:10, 28 April 2013
  • '''Pirut''' starts in ''Browse'' view by default. This view organizes packages into related groups, displaying top level groups on the left and sub-catego ...le, select the ''Sound and Video'' sub-category and press the '''[Optional Packages] ''' button. Locate '''Banshee''' in the list and queue it for installation
    4 KB (603 words) - 20:16, 12 September 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. Users of epiphany are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages, which contain an update
    3 KB (470 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ...ick the '''[Close] ''' button. Finally, once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''. ...; then click the '''[Close] ''' button. Once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''.
    3 KB (403 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • '''Pirut''' starts in ''Browse'' view by default. This view organizes packages into related groups, displaying top level groups on the left and sub-catego ...le, select the ''Sound and Video'' sub-category and press the '''[Optional Packages] ''' button. Locate '''Banshee''' in the list and queue it for installation
    4 KB (612 words) - 21:07, 17 December 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Architectures/ARM/AArch64/Stage4 Problem Packages]]
    63 bytes (7 words) - 15:39, 25 April 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[Changes/Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages]]
    64 bytes (8 words) - 15:58, 24 June 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Proposed]]
    52 bytes (6 words) - 19:28, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:Building packages for Docs Project]]
    56 bytes (7 words) - 17:57, 4 April 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Review]]
    50 bytes (6 words) - 19:29, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Orphaned]]
    52 bytes (6 words) - 19:30, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Rejected]]
    52 bytes (6 words) - 19:34, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[G11N/vFAD Translation Packages F25]]
    48 bytes (7 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages under review]]
    56 bytes (7 words) - 17:50, 21 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/UnderReview]]
    57 bytes (6 words) - 20:05, 3 November 2014
  • EPEL6 is an add on repository for RHEL and it's variants. It contains packages that are not shipped by RHEL. ...RHN. Some packages from this channel may be needed as dependencies of EPEL packages.
    2 KB (346 words) - 23:17, 7 February 2013
  • ...ported versions of Fedora Core (and Red Hat Linux) and other Fedora Extras packages. Please read [[Extras/RepositoryMixingProblems| RepositoryMixingProblems]] ...ors. All package managers handle automatic downloading and installation of packages that you specify. Yum and up2date are included in Fedora Core.
    6 KB (889 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...computes dependencies and figures out what things should occur to install packages. yum makes it easier to maintain groups of machines without having to manua ...ory by default, but you can also configure it to use a local repository of packages.
    1 KB (210 words) - 07:38, 3 April 2024
  • === Packages === ...eks and he's asked you to look over his packages while he's gone. How many packages does he have, and do any of them need attention? Where would you go to look
    3 KB (467 words) - 18:21, 9 October 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Archived:G11N/vFAD Translation F25 Packages]]
    57 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[Architectures/AArch64/Bootstrap/Stage4 Problem Packages]]
    69 bytes (7 words) - 14:43, 6 November 2014
  • Packages to add to qt45/kde422 update:
    142 bytes (19 words) - 20:11, 3 April 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Upgrade paths — renaming or splitting packages]]
    62 bytes (7 words) - 17:40, 21 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Upgrade paths — renaming or splitting packages]]
    62 bytes (7 words) - 17:40, 21 February 2009
  • File:Test-result-inprogress.gif
    /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/turbogears/widgets/static/spinner.gif
    (16 × 16 (2 KB)) - 21:21, 11 January 2010
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    163 bytes (25 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • By manually signing packages with different keys for different releases we increase the amount of time i * Having to manually initiate a signing run of the packages to be composed
    3 KB (502 words) - 18:59, 10 June 2009
  • ...drop kmods immediately in Rawhide, since they will not be allowed in F9. Packages that depend on kmods will remain in Fedora because it's possible that the m === Dropping orphaned packages from F8 ===
    2 KB (308 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...ll desktop environment. Fedora does provide the following KDE 3.5 library packages to run and build the many existing KDE 3 applications: * <code>qt3</code>, <code>qt3-devel</code> (and other <code>qt3-*</code> packages): Qt 3.3.8b
    3 KB (431 words) - 03:33, 9 February 2009
  • *provide additional packages to fedora user *submit more packages to fedora extras.
    637 bytes (90 words) - 15:18, 16 April 2010
  • ...packager SHOULD contact upstream and ask that they include one. For perl packages licensed under the artistic license or GPL, a comment in the %files section
    2 KB (243 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • ...ick the '''[Close] ''' button. Finally, once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''. ...; then click the '''[Close] ''' button. Once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''.
    3 KB (408 words) - 21:46, 17 December 2008
  • * [[MyFedora/Applications/MyPackages | My Packages ]] - Quick list of all packages owned by a user ...ions/PackageTable | Package Table ]] - Dynamic table which displays fedora packages
    1,020 bytes (133 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
  • File:PackageOrdering-Fedora10-Rpm-name.arch.log
    A list of installed packages in a next, next, finish type of installation using Fedora 10 x86_64
    (20 KB) - 02:43, 15 December 2008
  • * Ensure that all packages are built with gnatmake or gprbuild macroses (or fedora build flags must be == Current packages ==
    2 KB (185 words) - 07:55, 12 November 2020
  • ...the Guidelines permitting the use of <code>%{_libexecdir}</code> in Fedora packages even though it is not currently part of the FHS. The issue passed with 6 ye ...and ultimately voted to standardize mono packages as architecture specific packages that put their files under <code>%{_libdir}/%{name}</code>. The issue passe
    3 KB (421 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
  • Core packages: Build support packages:
    925 bytes (111 words) - 18:17, 19 November 2018
  • ...packages to be imported it doesn't involve any changes to already imported packages.
    1 KB (207 words) - 21:50, 17 February 2009
  • ...edora users and developers and to support one another in maintaining those packages.
    980 bytes (140 words) - 11:16, 10 April 2021
  • === When to drop orphan packages === ...haned during a release, will be dropped one month after that release. Ex. packages orphaned during F7 will be dropped from Rawhide one month after F8 is relea
    2 KB (232 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • ...ckages/Proposed| Proposed packages]] page to learn about our most wanted packages ;)
    1 KB (208 words) - 13:35, 24 July 2008
  • ...to a -devel package. See the [[Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages| Devel Packages Guideline]] if you are unclear on what these files are. [19] === Devel Packages ===
    2 KB (260 words) - 15:52, 5 October 2011
  • = Compatibility Packages Draft = Compatibility packages are packages which provide a secondary (usually older) version of an API or program from
    2 KB (322 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • = Extras Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) page index = This a list of all pages belonging to the Fedora [[EPEL| Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux]] (EPEL) effort.
    66 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 20:05, 6 January 2022
  • *RHL-8 (packages published for Red Hat Linux 8) *RHL-9 (packages published for Red Hat Linux 9)
    2 KB (400 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • Before you contribute any packages to Fedora Package Collection make sure you join the Fedora-Extras-Commits M The most important rule to checking in packages is this:
    2 KB (327 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...In this presentation, I will show you the basics of how to make a good RPM packages, using the Fedora Packaging Guidelines to help ensure that your software is ...on the Fedora Board. As of this writing, he is also the maintainer of more packages than any other Fedora maintainer, which makes him legally insane. In his sp
    1,009 bytes (172 words) - 20:04, 9 April 2009
  • .... People besides the packager can sign up to be notified about changes to packages or just browse the package listings if they're so inclined. ...r Koji and and the packagedb to have one database that knows about all the packages built in Fedora. The GUI's and CLI tools are tentatively supposed to be mer
    3 KB (437 words) - 22:00, 8 January 2010
  • ...t would be so hard for official package maintainers to build a couple more packages. I know there are people on the Fedora Forums who are packaging these thin ...e also need people doing package reviews to ensure the high quality of new packages being introduced in Fedora. Review guidelines are available http://fedorapr
    2 KB (384 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • === Branch Policy for Packages on Soon-to-be-EOL Releases ===
    1 KB (177 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • Fedora packages which use <code>pkg-config</code> to build against a library (e.g. 'foo') o For historical reasons, many packages seem to have a hard-coded "<code>BuildRequires: foo-devel</code>", with the
    2 KB (249 words) - 17:28, 8 March 2014
  • === Should packages(java, etc) enter Fedora w/o approved packaging guidelines? === ...when guidelines are needed for a type of packages, and will hold all such packages from entering until a basic set of guidelines is approved. *Please note th
    2 KB (276 words) - 23:05, 5 June 2008
  • ...should be exluded. The best start is, to exclude some or all of the fonts packages:
    2 KB (292 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • === Packages with empty debuginfo ===
    1 KB (140 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • ...locate the second stage of the installer as well as to set up where to get packages from. Due to space constraints within the loader, this largely limits how ...loader for just determining where to find the second stage. The source of packages can then be entirely done in the second stage. This will allow us to:
    2 KB (390 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ** not including Localization packages (see "Language Customization") ** Add Localized Packages
    2 KB (308 words) - 01:00, 11 June 2009
  • ...e tasks could also be tests of particular components (packages or group of packages) that cannot be run during build (traditional unit tests). Example of such ...if Taskotron misses features to run destructive tests for just particular packages, Fedora would still benefit from having such tests already. Those would be
    1 KB (171 words) - 17:27, 10 July 2015
  • Bring Fedora Haskell packages up to the latest [http://hackage.haskell.org/platform Haskell Platform] rel About 60 packages in Fedora need to be rebuilt for this.
    2 KB (330 words) - 07:06, 16 February 2012
  • |---- Packages -- binary packages `---- RPM-GPG-KEY* -- GPG signature for packages from Red Hat
    2 KB (391 words) - 22:30, 14 June 2010
  • By default, current versions of <code>yum</code> delete the data files and packages that they download, after these have been successfully used for an operatio * You may copy packages from the caches and reuse them elsewhere
    4 KB (620 words) - 01:16, 4 March 2009
  • File:F10.anaconda.gnome expanded.png
    ...vmware during F10 i386 installation. Shows the Gnome Desktop item Optional Packages expanded.
    (800 × 600 (81 KB)) - 07:10, 1 January 2009
  • File:F10.anaconda.graphical internet.detail.png
    ...e during F10 i386 installation. Shows the Graphical Internet item Optional Packages expanded.
    (800 × 600 (81 KB)) - 07:11, 1 January 2009
  • === Using Mach to do test builds of Packages for Fedora === ...supported. In this clean build root you can then easily generate pristine packages. mach is written in python. Currently, mach supports rpm-based distribution
    3 KB (498 words) - 18:28, 31 May 2008
  • == Installing Docker packages ==
    822 bytes (126 words) - 10:15, 6 February 2017
  • By Fedora 7, we want to move all Core packages into the community infrastructure currently used for Fedora Extras. ...are to lower barrier for community involvement, allow comaintainership of packages.
    3 KB (500 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Users of yelp are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages which contain a
    3 KB (425 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • ...an at least get a basic installable system consisting entirely of reviewed packages. ...new, open and accepted reviews plus a few gives the list below. Of the 99 packages:
    5 KB (741 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • semodule_link - Link SELinux policy module packages together of SELinux policy module packages into a single policy module package.
    1 KB (137 words) - 19:05, 15 August 2015
  • = History and Philosophy of EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) = ...PEL project was born out of Fedora. There was a need for quality 3rd party packages for Enterprise Linux using the already existing Fedora infrastructure. Earl
    1 KB (246 words) - 19:56, 6 January 2022
  • Bring the Lua scripting language and related software and packages into Fedora and integrate nicely into the base system. == Packages ==
    2 KB (324 words) - 12:12, 25 May 2012
  • Fedora packages which use <code>pkg-config</code> to build against a library (e.g. 'foo') o For historical reasons, many packages seem to have a hard-coded "<code>BuildRequires: foo-devel</code>", with the
    2 KB (254 words) - 16:30, 1 August 2013
  • EPEL is just one of several add on repositories with RPM packages for RHEL and derivates is not a official repository. The different reposito ...eam" in the sense that Fedora is upstream and EPEL just like Red Hat takes packages for its product that are constantly developed, tested and received feedback
    2 KB (421 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • FESCo approved orphaning any packages still owned by maintainers with deactivated accounts by general acclamation == Special exception for maven packages ==
    2 KB (251 words) - 19:54, 22 May 2009
  • ...elping new contributors learn packaging and get sponsored, please add your packages here. {{admon/tip|Please keep the list organized|Please list your packages in alphabetical order by '''package maintainer''' name. Please add links to
    986 bytes (145 words) - 19:52, 2 October 2021
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. Users of epiphany are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages which have been rebuilt against a patched firefox which is not vulnerable t
    3 KB (442 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • This would only apply to new packages, because I do not think there is * For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files. Existing packages that use a vendor tag must continue to do so for the life of the package. T
    2 KB (302 words) - 17:05, 21 October 2008
  • ...n MUST be composed on rawhide, using the compose tools in rawhide, and the packages from rawhide, if the spin is to be included into the next release cycle. * {{Template:Warning}} ''Possibly:'' Do NOT fix packages or applications on the Spin. A fix goes upstream.
    3 KB (460 words) - 01:59, 3 June 2008
  • Here we describe updates that are a rebase of NSS where all three packages need to be For a full update of three packages you will need to build them in this order: nss-util, nss-softokn, and nss.
    4 KB (633 words) - 17:20, 7 February 2013
  • ...on the implementation and the current state of critical path|Critical path packages}} Define a "Critical Path" set of packages that require special care when updating in rawhide and releases.
    4 KB (649 words) - 14:46, 7 July 2010
  • The Fedora Infrastructure is using three packages to test and monitor the health of the packager workflow and ensure the diff These three packages are named:
    569 bytes (83 words) - 15:26, 19 December 2019
  • ...I don't know how many, and that's not the point. The maintainers of these packages ''could'' solve their problem by adding Buildrequire: gawk to their spec fi ...he next few years. In the course of 2 or 3 years, more than 1/2 of Fedora packages will need awk to build.
    3 KB (556 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === Compat Packages Policy ===
    1 KB (162 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • # make sure none of the new packages are already installed<ref>It would confuse the tools.</ref>, # copy the new packages to a local directory<ref>
    1 KB (202 words) - 11:35, 22 October 2015
  • ...Fedora is taking whatever Fedora ships and mixing it into your own set of packages (installation media) or installed software (live media). ...ther run it 'unattended' (CLI mode using a kickstart file), or select your packages in the GUI mode.
    3 KB (492 words) - 18:32, 30 December 2008
  • *FC-1 (packages as shipped in Fedora Core 1) *FC-2 (packages as shipped in Fedora Core 2)
    2 KB (371 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ''' Why not just put the packages into -testing? ''' ...al bugs potentially introduced by -testing repositorys for existing stable packages on the stable os trees. For rawhide no such thing as testing exists.
    3 KB (405 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...dard allowed multiple revision packages are gpg-pubkeys and kernel related packages. Steve Grubb did the work on the script other than a few user feedback outp ...puter on an FC4 computer, the results were poor because of all of the Java packages required. Refer to the link above for pre-FC5Test computers for information
    2 KB (343 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...may wish to avoid them. This list may be an aid to those users. To exclude packages, add their names to an ''exclude'' directive in the ''/etc/yum.conf'' file, Fedora does not ban offensive language in packages.
    2 KB (239 words) - 11:57, 15 July 2011
  • ...vide some focus on bug-fixing for the test release. Development builds of packages can continue, however they will not be included in the test release unless
    2 KB (342 words) - 19:10, 14 February 2009
  • === Default commit acl for new packages === * Brief discussion on what the default acl for new packages should be (cvsextras or owner only). No decision made, and will discuss so
    2 KB (267 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • Mark Apache Avalon software packages as [[Packaging:Deprecating_Packages|deprecated]]. Apache Avalon software packages are intended to be eventually removed
    3 KB (422 words) - 16:17, 7 January 2019
  • * To sign newly built packages run: <code>extras-push release_name/number</code>, e.g. <code>extras-push * collect a list of newly built packages
    4 KB (702 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...rch package directories], [https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/ Debian Med Packages] ** openSuSE: [https://software.opensuse.org/ openSuSE - Search packages]
    2 KB (284 words) - 08:08, 28 April 2020
  • * packages: ...l maybe have to ship a compat-kdemultimedia(3) package and/or include some packages from extragear (kmid, kaudciocreator)
    2 KB (226 words) - 13:39, 28 May 2008
View (previous 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)