From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • = Modified packages = == Updated packages ==
    276 bytes (23 words) - 11:21, 9 January 2009
  • === Packages === [[Image:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png|500px|Click to view larger version]]
    209 bytes (21 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
  • * Fedora page (with testing packages): [http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ tsmetana.fedorapeople.org] == Packages ==
    515 bytes (70 words) - 10:02, 12 March 2009
  • An installation using all packages made available by anaconda. This can be accomplished two ways: ...this test is to ensure proper package ordering given a large enough set of packages.
    600 bytes (82 words) - 17:19, 16 February 2009
  • ...only the bits that are not conflicting with KDE3). So lets' see, what KDE4-Packages are ready to compile. | '''Application''' || '''Missing headers etc.''' || '''Upstream packages''' || '''Solution'''
    861 bytes (128 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • = Packages Needing Bootstrap = ...ould be rebuilt between Fedora Core revisions. This helps us avoid having packages that are linked against old versions of libraries and fail to compile with
    872 bytes (143 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash
    568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
  • ==Packages To Be Removed== ==Apps To Be Removed From Larger Packages==
    501 bytes (77 words) - 18:56, 14 June 2010
  • MinGW source packages have a circular dependency: == Bootstrap packages ==
    2 KB (276 words) - 14:54, 24 November 2008
  • == Packages == I (co-)maintain the following packages for Fedora:
    887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
  • ...that they are installed rather than Core packages. And when such important packages are replaced it can be ''very'' difficult to remove them.
    667 bytes (104 words) - 22:48, 2 June 2008
  • ...elements are not too big. We may just need one query here to ask for all packages you maintain and own (own is a subset of maintain) sorted by owned and subs ...nd links to their info page. We need a fast query in pkgdb to ask for all packages that is owned by a user and get a count. I don't think the DB was structur
    1 KB (209 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
  • == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG
    317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • == Noarch Packages == ...of arch independent data should be packaged to noarch subpackages. Noarch packages and subpackages must contain the same content no matter on which architectu
    750 bytes (107 words) - 18:47, 27 January 2009
  • === Documentation Packages with Embedded OS versioning === Documentation packages (as approved by the Fedora Documentation Project) can be named with the OS
    438 bytes (62 words) - 17:42, 31 March 2009
  • The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Pa But there are some exceptions for packages in EPEL, which are listed below.
    1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
  • The packages listed below failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after All failed packages with build log were reported in bugzilla on 2005-04-28.
    550 bytes (81 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages ==
    385 bytes (55 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...far. Documentation packages have unique constraints and quirks which other packages do not have.
    273 bytes (37 words) - 01:24, 1 December 2009
  • == Review Requests for Packages I Submitted == == Packages that I am Maintainer or Co-maintainer ==
    2 KB (321 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016
  • File:NoarchCandidates.txt
    List of "source packages: sub packages" that should be convertable to noarch without any work as they do neither c
    (51 KB) - 10:30, 15 June 2009
  • To assist packagers in bringing Telepathy-related packages to Fedora and assisting in their continued maintenance by providing timely == Telepathy packages awaiting review ==
    720 bytes (87 words) - 05:09, 20 August 2008
  • == Packages Maintained == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mintojoseph
    406 bytes (53 words) - 12:46, 2 June 2011
  • == Packages I maintain: ==
    488 bytes (71 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ...eMaintainers]] for details about how packages, including core distribution packages, are now maintained. Please do not refer to Fedora as "Fedora Core" anymore
    521 bytes (73 words) - 09:51, 11 February 2011
  • === Orphaned Packages === * Discussed some issues with orphaned packages:
    1 KB (151 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • === Guidelines Around Compatibility Packages === == Compatibility Packages ==
    1 KB (205 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]
    2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
  • == My packages ==
    919 bytes (140 words) - 22:49, 5 March 2009
  • * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==
    930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • == Fedora Packages I Maintain/Co-maintain == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/dgoodwin
    349 bytes (39 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/anishpatil current list in Fedora Pkg Db]
    574 bytes (81 words) - 13:07, 15 January 2014
  • ...'', '''Eclipse''', and '''Apache Tomcat''', as well as other Java software packages included in this release, are compatible with this environment. Refer to this section of the Release Notes for information on installing Java packages:
    1 KB (201 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • I like Fedora a lot, and I would like to contribute and maintain a lot new of packages to Fedora that are currently unavailable to Fedora Users. ...interested in providing Haskell packages (from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html Hackage Repository]) for the GHC Haskell compiler.
    670 bytes (97 words) - 19:15, 28 August 2008
  • === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===
    2 KB (248 words) - 09:23, 12 August 2014
  • * Orphaned Packages will be droped if no one steps up to maintain them ...a specific date; 2:obsoleted by a newer version; 3: still fc4 as disstag) packages before branching/when FC5 is released
    1 KB (188 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • * pirut will only be able to install packages listed in comps.xml ...tly should be listed in the comps file (e.g. no devel, libs or perl-module packages=
    769 bytes (116 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • '''Updating firefox will break the packages listed below for each release, unless they are rebuilt and updates are push ...ageMaintainers/UsefulScripts| ]] to look up and email the owners of those packages. [http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgquery.py ivazquez' pkgquery.py]
    2 KB (252 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • = Packages Lacking Extras Bugzilla Components = This is a list of packages which lack Extras Bugzilla Components. If you think it should have an Extr
    580 bytes (88 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...I'm the unix sysadmin for the Biology department at Duke - so most of the packages I'm working on for Fedora Extras are bioinformatics related somehow. ...of the bioperl and deps and is currently (2007-03-27) pushing the orphaned packages through a re-review process.
    1 KB (174 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/BasePackages Base Packages] ...raproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/PerLanguageLangpackPackages Per Language Packages]
    2 KB (189 words) - 06:00, 9 March 2020
  • We want to move packages from depending on tomcat5 (and its APIs) to tomcat6. Here are the various P == Packages ==
    767 bytes (86 words) - 15:17, 16 December 2010
  • ...d Hat Linux and other Fedora Extras packages. If you have installed custom packages from other respositories, it is likely that you will run into compatibility ...repositories is to completely avoid publishing packages that somebody else packages. This is obviously not an option because it would be too limiting for the F
    2 KB (382 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • = Fedora Astronomy, refused packages = ...ges already in Fedora]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .
    2 KB (315 words) - 20:11, 3 November 2014
  • ...bution ISO. These packages were formerly part of the Fedora Extras set of packages:
    373 bytes (55 words) - 10:15, 14 April 2009
  • === Cleaning Old Files and Packages === ...d config files stay in my system. Is there any way to remove theses unused packages and old config files?''
    2 KB (411 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • * Get all packages built with the new and reduced set of packages installed in the default mock buildroots. ...) packages except large ones containing static content (eg. some game data packages) are expected to be rebuilt. '''Note:''' remember to do "cvs up" in your p
    4 KB (557 words) - 19:16, 28 May 2008
  • * a proper policy to tag packages in CVS that are dead / unused / whatever (like [https://www.redhat.com/arch * create Packaging/MaintaincePolicy which policys or hints how packages should be maintained
    1 KB (188 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • = Large Data Packages = Large, arch-independent data packages do not need to be recompiled for different Fedora releases. If they were r
    919 bytes (134 words) - 02:13, 25 February 2009
  • This wiki page was created to track progress on the MATE Desktop packages; anyone if free to help with the pending tasks. Takers please pick a task y ...ling to provide a fix, patch or any other improvement for the MATE Desktop packages please go to ''#fedora-mate'' on FreeNode and ask for help on how to get st
    2 KB (338 words) - 19:56, 21 December 2012
  • === Packages under review === ...in request]]. please move it to [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages| accepted packages]],
    990 bytes (143 words) - 13:57, 18 January 2015
  • ...s to invoke system-install-packages whenever they need specific additional packages number of other associated packages must be installed in order for all of the features within the package to
    2 KB (275 words) - 18:30, 1 August 2008
  • List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI
    3 KB (368 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
  • == Maintainer of the following fedora packages ==
    419 bytes (55 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • [[Category:Fonts|Packages]] [[Category:Packages|Fonts]]
    215 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:27, 27 June 2008
  • ...e would need are "source-only dkms payload" packages for each module. Such packages would include the necessary kernel module source code and dkms specific con ...believe have the potential for being mainlined. DKMS source-only payload packages could be reviewed on a Fedora release basis to see if active progress has b
    2 KB (296 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...usses the reasons for keeping the "jpp" substring in release tags for Java packages that have been imported from JPackage === ...y: The substring is needed to allow existence of separate stacks of common packages<BR>
    2 KB (364 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assurance is vital to this effort. == Testing packages ==
    2 KB (252 words) - 20:03, 6 January 2022
  • = Access Control with Fedora Packages = ...ainers. This is the safe default as it ensures that new security-critical packages don't have a window between being set up as a package and having the access
    1 KB (237 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • * F8(~4400),F9(~5000) packages has built using mock and koji. [http://8ne.sakura.ne.jp:20007/pub/linux/fed * F10(~5700) packages have almost done.
    2 KB (271 words) - 10:05, 15 January 2009
  • === Packages Maintained ===
    831 bytes (108 words) - 05:24, 26 June 2008
  • ...10.0, those new packages will be retagged into dist-f9-perl. The remaining packages will then be rebuilt in dist-f9-perl. Some modules which were previously pa ...ich all of the other perl-related packages needed to rebuild. All of these packages will be built against perl-5.10.0 in dist-f9-perl, to ensure that perl-5.10
    2 KB (333 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===
    2 KB (262 words) - 12:52, 11 March 2014
  • ...ory information attached to them so it is possible for users to browse for packages. Currently, we have the RPM Group tag and comps.xml for this. ...rent people composing package groups may want to include different sets of packages into the groups.
    4 KB (592 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages that embed code copies == ...lnerabilities often happen as a result because security sensitive embedded packages may be out of date and have outstanding issues.
    780 bytes (118 words) - 04:15, 11 November 2010
  • ...[ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/rpms-for-exim Exim RPM packages] and a variety of packages on the (now-irrelevant) page http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/rpms.php. More rec Tim is currently maintaining the following packages in Extras:
    3 KB (393 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • Packages must not contain explicit ''Requires'' on libraries except when absolutely the required packages. Explicit dependencies on specific package names may aid the
    2 KB (244 words) - 16:49, 22 February 2009
  • Packages listed below don't install any desktop related packages (like GUI libraries, ConsoleKit, ...) as dependencies. === Base packages ===
    932 bytes (106 words) - 12:53, 3 December 2009
  • = FE packages no longer available in the FE development repository = This page lists FE packages that appear in the <code>owners.list</code> file but are no longer present
    2 KB (289 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • I maintain these packages: Retired packages:
    398 bytes (49 words) - 18:53, 3 September 2008
  • ...rojects bundled together in a single package. This applies equally to font packages. Multi-source packages are difficult to maintain and confusing to users. In addition:
    2 KB (271 words) - 17:35, 26 August 2008
  • ...Gilmore| Dennis Gilmore]] has put together a script that can branch your packages. All you need to do is provide the proper input to him. '''Step 1.''' Figure out which packages you want branched.
    850 bytes (135 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...ommon filters for the table (for instance builds will have packages I own, packages I maintain).
    242 bytes (37 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
  • = Packages I maintain = = Packages submitted for review =
    1 KB (207 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • Fedora 8 includes KDE 4.0 (beta) development libraries. The following new packages are provided: Use these packages to develop, build and run KDE 4 applications within KDE 3 or any other desk
    2 KB (277 words) - 03:55, 23 January 2009
  • [[JohnMahowald/Extras| My packages and wishlist for packages]] * Use alien on all Fedora packages and make dpkg Fedora
    1 KB (158 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • Make sure all the packages in Fedora have been reviewed. This will include ...that haven't been already reviewed (after the big merge), and catching old packages from fedora.us days where we do not have a review log on file (or no longer
    867 bytes (129 words) - 20:22, 28 May 2008
  • ...is is with your first package up for review. You also can comment on other packages being reviewed.
    650 bytes (109 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • Scripting installed packages. == Adding Packages ==
    1,012 bytes (145 words) - 10:05, 2 December 2008
  • To bring a broad range of high quality [http://caml.inria.fr Objective CAML] packages to the Fedora project. == Current list of packages ==
    1 KB (167 words) - 05:41, 16 October 2010
  • [[Category:Fonts|Rejected and retired packages]] [[Category:Rejected and retired packages|Fonts]]
    11 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:28, 27 June 2008
  • List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]
    3 KB (373 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
  • * Build new packages into the proper place * Build new packages into the proper place
    4 KB (583 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • 1. A CD-Version: The Live-CD should contain most of the basic KDE packages and some of the most powerful applications from outside KDE ...Live-CD adds support for localization and would also bring some additional packages
    3 KB (377 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • ...e packages you need doesn't work, you can try the repository of just-built packages, adjusting for your architecture as appropriate: === Packages that are done ===
    3 KB (409 words) - 06:37, 14 September 2009
  • ...le to build new kernel-module packages without having to ship new userland packages * working debuginfo packages
    862 bytes (136 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • == Updated Packages in Fedora {{Template:DocsDict/BeatsVer}} == Updated Packages not generated yet
    416 bytes (59 words) - 04:15, 23 January 2009
  • ...'' format, the preferred format of the GNU project. Since we use many GNU packages, it's best to guarantee that the default buildroot contains /sbin/install-i
    333 bytes (51 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • Status: '''all packages built, update in updates-testing''' == Core packages ==
    944 bytes (88 words) - 15:07, 29 March 2011
  • Managing Packages: Developing Packages:
    408 bytes (48 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated
    2 KB (322 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...his FAQ tries to answer some common questions and issues around EPEL7 beta packages and processes. == What packages are available in EPEL7? ==
    2 KB (296 words) - 08:33, 21 August 2014
  • * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated
    2 KB (322 words) - 20:17, 12 September 2008
  • * Status of KDE 4 packages ...mainly due to the parallel-installability issues. We will try to make some packages still using /opt/kde4 available in the meantime.
    1 KB (140 words) - 13:36, 28 May 2008
  • == Lohit packages in Fedora == For Fedora 11 onwards install above packages.
    2 KB (234 words) - 06:39, 28 January 2015
  • * All packages that have dependency issues are removed from the devel repository. * All packages that have Epoch-Version-Release upgrade path problems from previous release
    1 KB (178 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == The Selection of Packages from Groups == * From the groups selected, default packages are selected.
    2 KB (286 words) - 16:19, 15 December 2008
  • ...nstall to a hard disk and use it to bootstrap your system and install more packages if required. %packages --nobase
    445 bytes (68 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • * ''Apply Updates'' starts the update process selecting all available packages * ''Quit'' closes '''Puplet''', no packages are updated
    2 KB (324 words) - 20:48, 17 December 2008
  • ...e and uses that to indicate that language support is available. So if some packages virtually provides <pkgname>-<langcode> that language will not be considere The current inconsistencies I found are for packages
    2 KB (248 words) - 09:30, 24 September 2013
  • = A proposal to add several packages to the Exception List = I believe the following packages should be present in every buildroot for any Fedora package:
    2 KB (384 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages == I maintain the following packages in Fedora:
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • * start/finish reviews of any new kde4 modules/packages (e.g., kde-l10n, extragear stuff) - DONE * check all packages if defined packages in "Requires" are enough - DONE
    6 KB (791 words) - 19:19, 3 June 2008
  • ...server also mirrors the Fedora Core (and Red Hat Linux) base distribution packages. It does this mostly for users of [https://moin.conectiva.com.br/AptRpm APT |<|1>'''Extra Packages'''||'''extras'''||Additional packages not in the base distribution
    4 KB (536 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • As part of this change, we removed support for the X11 session in KDE Plasma packages in Fedora 40. Thus, the KDE SIG created a COPR of those KDE Plasma packages that tracks our packages in Fedora and rebuilds them with the X11 session subpackages automatically:
    888 bytes (142 words) - 19:13, 29 January 2024
  • === Cut-off date for new packages requests in older branches === * FESCo decided the cut-off for new F-(X-2) packages is when F-X goes gold. (For example, new F8 package requests will not be ac
    1 KB (153 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • == 5. Searching for Packages with yum == ...n your system. Searches automatically include both installed and available packages.
    3 KB (528 words) - 01:14, 4 March 2009
  • .NET Core and other related packages in the standard Fedora repositories are mainted by the [[SIGs/DotNet|DotNet == References and packages ==
    2 KB (258 words) - 21:59, 26 April 2024
  • === Orphaned Packages ===
    899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • * I'm mostly interested in java, lisp and audio creation packages for Fedora. ...the packages I help maintain: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/green
    837 bytes (116 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • I maintain quite a few packages, see the package database for the complete list: * [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/hubbitus?acls=owner Packages owned]
    2 KB (238 words) - 11:34, 9 May 2017
  • ...pypi PyPI] compatible server that we can use to mirror a restricted set of packages and their versions from the root PyPI server. A DevPI server can have multi == Indexes and packages ==
    3 KB (465 words) - 17:33, 19 March 2015
  • === Default commit acl for new packages === * After a long discussion, FESCo approved a proposal the new packages will be created with an default acl that is open to all cvsextras members,
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. ...ages, which contain an update to devhelp built against the updated Firefox packages.
    3 KB (461 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Users of yelp are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages, which contain
    3 KB (427 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • Currently all MinGW packages are development packages, and so there is no package/package-devel split. Should we do this or is i ...hen it wouldn't it be better to create -static and -devel pacakges for all packages (like in native version) and put
    2 KB (235 words) - 19:31, 19 May 2011
  • * All packages could use a build test (generally on rawhide if it's not broken) and rpmlin ...esh build test under rawhide anyway as there's plenty of potential for old packages to fail to build in rawhide, especially after things like gcc updates.
    1 KB (248 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • * KDE 4 Beta 2 Packages ...mmary of the work done by KevinKofler on the KDE 4 development environment packages:
    575 bytes (65 words) - 13:37, 28 May 2008
  • ...a.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150222 Blocker bugs] , bugfixes, and packages leading up to gnome 2.14 will be allowed into the tree, however feature imp Packages should be built into the dist-fc5-HEAD collection instance. To move a pack
    956 bytes (147 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • If two or more packages provide a common set If you have a collection of packages which provide a common set
    2 KB (248 words) - 18:06, 5 August 2009
  • == Maintaining Packages == Package Maintainers update, fix bugs and improve packages in the EPEL collection. See the [[EPEL_Package_Maintainers|EPEL Package Mai
    2 KB (269 words) - 19:55, 6 January 2022
  • ...le version of most interpreters (python, perl, php, etc). The application packages we build all target this version. However, the end user may install other .../bin/python</code> as there's no ambiguitiy in which version of python the packages will invoke. When we use <code>#! /usr/bin/env python</code> in the sheban
    2 KB (311 words) - 14:06, 31 August 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Changes/Harden All Packages]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 13:29, 14 March 2015
  • #REDIRECT [[Retired packages]]
    30 bytes (3 words) - 22:02, 22 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[:Category:Packages]]
    32 bytes (3 words) - 13:09, 9 June 2008
  • = Base Packages Overview =
    26 bytes (3 words) - 11:40, 3 December 2009
  • File:Lxde-pirut-optional-packages.png
    Optional packages in LXDE
    (450 × 348 (136 KB)) - 19:31, 2 September 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Removing packages SOP]]
    35 bytes (4 words) - 18:57, 10 June 2009
  • File:F14-ghc-libs-deps.svg
    F14 ghc packages dependency graph
    (4,176 × 505 (57 KB)) - 02:01, 19 October 2011
  • * Xnest (for testing graphical packages) == Testing non-graphical packages with mock ==
    2 KB (325 words) - 15:31, 30 March 2017
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. ...ages, which contain an update to devhelp built against the updated Firefox packages.
    3 KB (467 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • Treat Packages as new packages and have a full Review. Followed by marking the old package dead in cvs an Packages are sometimes renamed, either by upstream action or locally in the collecti
    2 KB (276 words) - 22:51, 26 January 2009
  • === Dead packages ===
    673 bytes (99 words) - 13:11, 19 May 2011
  • ...will document in the wiki that FE branches in maintenance mode use Legacy packages (thl: was done in mid-september afaik) packages
    555 bytes (75 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...here interested parties gather on irc and review a number of Fedora Extras packages that are awaiting review. * People seeking reviews for packages can join and drum up interest in their package to get it reviewed.
    2 KB (393 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • = Modified Fedora packages =
    38 bytes (4 words) - 14:09, 11 January 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]
    38 bytes (4 words) - 08:58, 30 May 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[Retire Orphaned Packages]]
    38 bytes (4 words) - 09:04, 30 May 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[Who is allowed to modify which packages]]
    53 bytes (8 words) - 22:01, 22 February 2009
  • = List of modified packages =
    29 bytes (4 words) - 09:56, 15 July 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Tracking downstream packages]]
    42 bytes (4 words) - 22:04, 22 February 2009
  • ...computes dependencies and figures out what things should occur to install packages. yum makes it easier to maintain groups of machines without having to manua ...ory by default, but you can also configure it to use a local repository of packages.
    1 KB (196 words) - 01:54, 26 August 2016
  • ...se<ref>Print, screen, headings, code…</ref> to help users choose the right packages to install. Also, it is considered good form to credit the original font de ...n_typefaces19th.html Greek Font Society web site]. This is what other font packages should strive to emulate.
    877 bytes (129 words) - 12:06, 22 February 2009
  • '''Pirut''' starts in ''Browse'' view by default. This view organizes packages into related groups, displaying top level groups on the left and sub-catego ...le, select the ''Sound and Video'' sub-category and press the '''[Optional Packages] ''' button. Locate '''Banshee''' in the list and queue it for installation
    4 KB (600 words) - 23:22, 2 June 2008
  • * To build all Zope related productive packages for each release of Fedora and EL. == Prominent Packages ==
    2 KB (346 words) - 09:48, 20 September 2010
  • ...proved by FESCo and begun to remove the dependency on net-tools within the packages in Fedora. There has already been a good start on this with several packages either already engaging upstream discussions or with adjustments made to re
    2 KB (251 words) - 09:28, 26 October 2017
  • === List of Haskell Packages I have created for Fedora ===
    58 bytes (9 words) - 19:19, 28 August 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Policy for encouraging comaintainers of packages]]
    62 bytes (7 words) - 21:59, 22 February 2009
  • File:Dependency-graph.png
    Dependency Graph of Zope Packages
    (1,385 × 749 (151 KB)) - 09:50, 20 September 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]
    48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
  • File:Rpmfusion packages.jpg
    RPM fusion packages needed when installing CUDA
    (945 × 421 (95 KB)) - 20:34, 6 October 2012
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]
    45 bytes (6 words) - 15:28, 15 June 2010
  • ...s/PackageChanges/UpdatedPackages. You can also find a comparison of major packages between all Fedora versions at http://distrowatch.com/fedora.
    1 KB (170 words) - 22:45, 25 February 2009
  • ** graphviz, python packages {{admon/important| This Package installs GUI and X related packages as dependencies}}
    571 bytes (71 words) - 11:53, 3 December 2009
  • ...hat the 'server list'. That list is tracked [[Releases/FeatureFedoraServer/Packages| here]] ...>sendmail-cf</code> etc. by querying for the dependants of the server list packages.
    2 KB (381 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • == Included packages ==
    938 bytes (110 words) - 19:33, 3 February 2015
  • ==== Special Packages: ==== ==== Special Packages: ====
    4 KB (495 words) - 02:10, 28 April 2013
  • '''Pirut''' starts in ''Browse'' view by default. This view organizes packages into related groups, displaying top level groups on the left and sub-catego ...le, select the ''Sound and Video'' sub-category and press the '''[Optional Packages] ''' button. Locate '''Banshee''' in the list and queue it for installation
    4 KB (603 words) - 20:16, 12 September 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. Users of epiphany are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages, which contain an update
    3 KB (470 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ...ick the '''[Close] ''' button. Finally, once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''. ...; then click the '''[Close] ''' button. Once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''.
    3 KB (403 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • '''Pirut''' starts in ''Browse'' view by default. This view organizes packages into related groups, displaying top level groups on the left and sub-catego ...le, select the ''Sound and Video'' sub-category and press the '''[Optional Packages] ''' button. Locate '''Banshee''' in the list and queue it for installation
    4 KB (612 words) - 21:07, 17 December 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Changes/Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages]]
    64 bytes (8 words) - 15:58, 24 June 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Proposed]]
    52 bytes (6 words) - 19:28, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:Building packages for Docs Project]]
    56 bytes (7 words) - 17:57, 4 April 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Review]]
    50 bytes (6 words) - 19:29, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Orphaned]]
    52 bytes (6 words) - 19:30, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Rejected]]
    52 bytes (6 words) - 19:34, 22 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[G11N/vFAD Translation Packages F25]]
    48 bytes (7 words) - 19:54, 13 September 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages under review]]
    56 bytes (7 words) - 17:50, 21 August 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/UnderReview]]
    57 bytes (6 words) - 20:05, 3 November 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[Architectures/ARM/AArch64/Stage4 Problem Packages]]
    63 bytes (7 words) - 15:39, 25 April 2013
  • EPEL6 is an add on repository for RHEL and it's variants. It contains packages that are not shipped by RHEL. ...RHN. Some packages from this channel may be needed as dependencies of EPEL packages.
    2 KB (346 words) - 23:17, 7 February 2013
  • ...ported versions of Fedora Core (and Red Hat Linux) and other Fedora Extras packages. Please read [[Extras/RepositoryMixingProblems| RepositoryMixingProblems]] ...ors. All package managers handle automatic downloading and installation of packages that you specify. Yum and up2date are included in Fedora Core.
    6 KB (889 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...computes dependencies and figures out what things should occur to install packages. yum makes it easier to maintain groups of machines without having to manua ...ory by default, but you can also configure it to use a local repository of packages.
    1 KB (210 words) - 07:38, 3 April 2024
  • === Packages === ...eks and he's asked you to look over his packages while he's gone. How many packages does he have, and do any of them need attention? Where would you go to look
    3 KB (467 words) - 18:21, 9 October 2009
  • Packages to add to qt45/kde422 update:
    142 bytes (19 words) - 20:11, 3 April 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Upgrade paths — renaming or splitting packages]]
    62 bytes (7 words) - 17:40, 21 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Upgrade paths — renaming or splitting packages]]
    62 bytes (7 words) - 17:40, 21 February 2009
  • File:Test-result-inprogress.gif
    /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/turbogears/widgets/static/spinner.gif
    (16 × 16 (2 KB)) - 21:21, 11 January 2010
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    163 bytes (25 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Archived:G11N/vFAD Translation F25 Packages]]
    57 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[Architectures/AArch64/Bootstrap/Stage4 Problem Packages]]
    69 bytes (7 words) - 14:43, 6 November 2014
  • By manually signing packages with different keys for different releases we increase the amount of time i * Having to manually initiate a signing run of the packages to be composed
    3 KB (502 words) - 18:59, 10 June 2009
  • ...drop kmods immediately in Rawhide, since they will not be allowed in F9. Packages that depend on kmods will remain in Fedora because it's possible that the m === Dropping orphaned packages from F8 ===
    2 KB (308 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...ll desktop environment. Fedora does provide the following KDE 3.5 library packages to run and build the many existing KDE 3 applications: * <code>qt3</code>, <code>qt3-devel</code> (and other <code>qt3-*</code> packages): Qt 3.3.8b
    3 KB (431 words) - 03:33, 9 February 2009
  • *provide additional packages to fedora user *submit more packages to fedora extras.
    637 bytes (90 words) - 15:18, 16 April 2010
  • ...packager SHOULD contact upstream and ask that they include one. For perl packages licensed under the artistic license or GPL, a comment in the %files section
    2 KB (243 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • ...ick the '''[Close] ''' button. Finally, once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''. ...; then click the '''[Close] ''' button. Once you're finished selecting the packages you want to install, click the '''[Apply] ''' button in '''Pirut'''.
    3 KB (408 words) - 21:46, 17 December 2008
  • * [[MyFedora/Applications/MyPackages | My Packages ]] - Quick list of all packages owned by a user ...ions/PackageTable | Package Table ]] - Dynamic table which displays fedora packages
    1,020 bytes (133 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
  • File:PackageOrdering-Fedora10-Rpm-name.arch.log
    A list of installed packages in a next, next, finish type of installation using Fedora 10 x86_64
    (20 KB) - 02:43, 15 December 2008
  • * Ensure that all packages are built with gnatmake or gprbuild macroses (or fedora build flags must be == Current packages ==
    2 KB (185 words) - 07:55, 12 November 2020
  • ...the Guidelines permitting the use of <code>%{_libexecdir}</code> in Fedora packages even though it is not currently part of the FHS. The issue passed with 6 ye ...and ultimately voted to standardize mono packages as architecture specific packages that put their files under <code>%{_libdir}/%{name}</code>. The issue passe
    3 KB (421 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
  • Core packages: Build support packages:
    925 bytes (111 words) - 18:17, 19 November 2018
  • ...packages to be imported it doesn't involve any changes to already imported packages.
    1 KB (207 words) - 21:50, 17 February 2009
  • ...edora users and developers and to support one another in maintaining those packages.
    980 bytes (140 words) - 11:16, 10 April 2021
  • === When to drop orphan packages === ...haned during a release, will be dropped one month after that release. Ex. packages orphaned during F7 will be dropped from Rawhide one month after F8 is relea
    2 KB (232 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • ...ckages/Proposed| Proposed packages]] page to learn about our most wanted packages ;)
    1 KB (208 words) - 13:35, 24 July 2008
  • ...to a -devel package. See the [[Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages| Devel Packages Guideline]] if you are unclear on what these files are. [19] === Devel Packages ===
    2 KB (260 words) - 15:52, 5 October 2011
  • = Compatibility Packages Draft = Compatibility packages are packages which provide a secondary (usually older) version of an API or program from
    2 KB (322 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • = Extras Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) page index = This a list of all pages belonging to the Fedora [[EPEL| Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux]] (EPEL) effort.
    66 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 20:05, 6 January 2022
  • *RHL-8 (packages published for Red Hat Linux 8) *RHL-9 (packages published for Red Hat Linux 9)
    2 KB (400 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • Before you contribute any packages to Fedora Package Collection make sure you join the Fedora-Extras-Commits M The most important rule to checking in packages is this:
    2 KB (327 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...In this presentation, I will show you the basics of how to make a good RPM packages, using the Fedora Packaging Guidelines to help ensure that your software is ...on the Fedora Board. As of this writing, he is also the maintainer of more packages than any other Fedora maintainer, which makes him legally insane. In his sp
    1,009 bytes (172 words) - 20:04, 9 April 2009
  • .... People besides the packager can sign up to be notified about changes to packages or just browse the package listings if they're so inclined. ...r Koji and and the packagedb to have one database that knows about all the packages built in Fedora. The GUI's and CLI tools are tentatively supposed to be mer
    3 KB (437 words) - 22:00, 8 January 2010
  • ...t would be so hard for official package maintainers to build a couple more packages. I know there are people on the Fedora Forums who are packaging these thin ...e also need people doing package reviews to ensure the high quality of new packages being introduced in Fedora. Review guidelines are available http://fedorapr
    2 KB (384 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • === Branch Policy for Packages on Soon-to-be-EOL Releases ===
    1 KB (177 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • Fedora packages which use <code>pkg-config</code> to build against a library (e.g. 'foo') o For historical reasons, many packages seem to have a hard-coded "<code>BuildRequires: foo-devel</code>", with the
    2 KB (249 words) - 17:28, 8 March 2014
  • === Should packages(java, etc) enter Fedora w/o approved packaging guidelines? === ...when guidelines are needed for a type of packages, and will hold all such packages from entering until a basic set of guidelines is approved. *Please note th
    2 KB (276 words) - 23:05, 5 June 2008
  • ...should be exluded. The best start is, to exclude some or all of the fonts packages:
    2 KB (292 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • === Packages with empty debuginfo ===
    1 KB (140 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • ...locate the second stage of the installer as well as to set up where to get packages from. Due to space constraints within the loader, this largely limits how ...loader for just determining where to find the second stage. The source of packages can then be entirely done in the second stage. This will allow us to:
    2 KB (390 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ** not including Localization packages (see "Language Customization") ** Add Localized Packages
    2 KB (308 words) - 01:00, 11 June 2009
  • ...e tasks could also be tests of particular components (packages or group of packages) that cannot be run during build (traditional unit tests). Example of such ...if Taskotron misses features to run destructive tests for just particular packages, Fedora would still benefit from having such tests already. Those would be
    1 KB (171 words) - 17:27, 10 July 2015
  • Bring Fedora Haskell packages up to the latest [http://hackage.haskell.org/platform Haskell Platform] rel About 60 packages in Fedora need to be rebuilt for this.
    2 KB (330 words) - 07:06, 16 February 2012
  • |---- Packages -- binary packages `---- RPM-GPG-KEY* -- GPG signature for packages from Red Hat
    2 KB (391 words) - 22:30, 14 June 2010
  • By default, current versions of <code>yum</code> delete the data files and packages that they download, after these have been successfully used for an operatio * You may copy packages from the caches and reuse them elsewhere
    4 KB (620 words) - 01:16, 4 March 2009
  • File:F10.anaconda.graphical internet.detail.png
    ...e during F10 i386 installation. Shows the Graphical Internet item Optional Packages expanded.
    (800 × 600 (81 KB)) - 07:11, 1 January 2009
  • File:F10.anaconda.gnome expanded.png
    ...vmware during F10 i386 installation. Shows the Gnome Desktop item Optional Packages expanded.
    (800 × 600 (81 KB)) - 07:10, 1 January 2009
  • === Using Mach to do test builds of Packages for Fedora === ...supported. In this clean build root you can then easily generate pristine packages. mach is written in python. Currently, mach supports rpm-based distribution
    3 KB (498 words) - 18:28, 31 May 2008
  • == Installing Docker packages ==
    822 bytes (126 words) - 10:15, 6 February 2017
  • By Fedora 7, we want to move all Core packages into the community infrastructure currently used for Fedora Extras. ...are to lower barrier for community involvement, allow comaintainership of packages.
    3 KB (500 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Users of yelp are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages which contain a
    3 KB (425 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • ...an at least get a basic installable system consisting entirely of reviewed packages. ...new, open and accepted reviews plus a few gives the list below. Of the 99 packages:
    5 KB (741 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • semodule_link - Link SELinux policy module packages together of SELinux policy module packages into a single policy module package.
    1 KB (137 words) - 19:05, 15 August 2015
  • = History and Philosophy of EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) = ...PEL project was born out of Fedora. There was a need for quality 3rd party packages for Enterprise Linux using the already existing Fedora infrastructure. Earl
    1 KB (246 words) - 19:56, 6 January 2022
  • Bring the Lua scripting language and related software and packages into Fedora and integrate nicely into the base system. == Packages ==
    2 KB (324 words) - 12:12, 25 May 2012
  • Fedora packages which use <code>pkg-config</code> to build against a library (e.g. 'foo') o For historical reasons, many packages seem to have a hard-coded "<code>BuildRequires: foo-devel</code>", with the
    2 KB (254 words) - 16:30, 1 August 2013
  • EPEL is just one of several add on repositories with RPM packages for RHEL and derivates is not a official repository. The different reposito ...eam" in the sense that Fedora is upstream and EPEL just like Red Hat takes packages for its product that are constantly developed, tested and received feedback
    2 KB (421 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • FESCo approved orphaning any packages still owned by maintainers with deactivated accounts by general acclamation == Special exception for maven packages ==
    2 KB (251 words) - 19:54, 22 May 2009
  • ...elping new contributors learn packaging and get sponsored, please add your packages here. {{admon/tip|Please keep the list organized|Please list your packages in alphabetical order by '''package maintainer''' name. Please add links to
    986 bytes (145 words) - 19:52, 2 October 2021
  • Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. Users of epiphany are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages which have been rebuilt against a patched firefox which is not vulnerable t
    3 KB (442 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • This would only apply to new packages, because I do not think there is * For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files. Existing packages that use a vendor tag must continue to do so for the life of the package. T
    2 KB (302 words) - 17:05, 21 October 2008
  • ...n MUST be composed on rawhide, using the compose tools in rawhide, and the packages from rawhide, if the spin is to be included into the next release cycle. * {{Template:Warning}} ''Possibly:'' Do NOT fix packages or applications on the Spin. A fix goes upstream.
    3 KB (460 words) - 01:59, 3 June 2008
  • Here we describe updates that are a rebase of NSS where all three packages need to be For a full update of three packages you will need to build them in this order: nss-util, nss-softokn, and nss.
    4 KB (633 words) - 17:20, 7 February 2013
  • ...on the implementation and the current state of critical path|Critical path packages}} Define a "Critical Path" set of packages that require special care when updating in rawhide and releases.
    4 KB (649 words) - 14:46, 7 July 2010
  • The Fedora Infrastructure is using three packages to test and monitor the health of the packager workflow and ensure the diff These three packages are named:
    569 bytes (83 words) - 15:26, 19 December 2019
  • ...I don't know how many, and that's not the point. The maintainers of these packages ''could'' solve their problem by adding Buildrequire: gawk to their spec fi ...he next few years. In the course of 2 or 3 years, more than 1/2 of Fedora packages will need awk to build.
    3 KB (556 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === Compat Packages Policy ===
    1 KB (162 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • # make sure none of the new packages are already installed<ref>It would confuse the tools.</ref>, # copy the new packages to a local directory<ref>
    1 KB (202 words) - 11:35, 22 October 2015
  • ...Fedora is taking whatever Fedora ships and mixing it into your own set of packages (installation media) or installed software (live media). ...ther run it 'unattended' (CLI mode using a kickstart file), or select your packages in the GUI mode.
    3 KB (492 words) - 18:32, 30 December 2008
  • *FC-1 (packages as shipped in Fedora Core 1) *FC-2 (packages as shipped in Fedora Core 2)
    2 KB (371 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ''' Why not just put the packages into -testing? ''' ...al bugs potentially introduced by -testing repositorys for existing stable packages on the stable os trees. For rawhide no such thing as testing exists.
    3 KB (405 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...dard allowed multiple revision packages are gpg-pubkeys and kernel related packages. Steve Grubb did the work on the script other than a few user feedback outp ...puter on an FC4 computer, the results were poor because of all of the Java packages required. Refer to the link above for pre-FC5Test computers for information
    2 KB (343 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...may wish to avoid them. This list may be an aid to those users. To exclude packages, add their names to an ''exclude'' directive in the ''/etc/yum.conf'' file, Fedora does not ban offensive language in packages.
    2 KB (239 words) - 11:57, 15 July 2011
  • ...vide some focus on bug-fixing for the test release. Development builds of packages can continue, however they will not be included in the test release unless
    2 KB (342 words) - 19:10, 14 February 2009
  • === Default commit acl for new packages === * Brief discussion on what the default acl for new packages should be (cvsextras or owner only). No decision made, and will discuss so
    2 KB (267 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • Mark Apache Avalon software packages as [[Packaging:Deprecating_Packages|deprecated]]. Apache Avalon software packages are intended to be eventually removed
    3 KB (422 words) - 16:17, 7 January 2019
  • * To sign newly built packages run: <code>extras-push release_name/number</code>, e.g. <code>extras-push * collect a list of newly built packages
    4 KB (702 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...rch package directories], [https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/ Debian Med Packages] ** openSuSE: [https://software.opensuse.org/ openSuSE - Search packages]
    2 KB (284 words) - 08:08, 28 April 2020
  • * packages: ...l maybe have to ship a compat-kdemultimedia(3) package and/or include some packages from extragear (kmid, kaudciocreator)
    2 KB (226 words) - 13:39, 28 May 2008
  • ...barcamp.org/FudconBoston2007 FudconBoston] ) and review a number of Fedora packages that are Fedora package guidelines. All of the formerly Fedora Core packages will
    3 KB (550 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • We need a better web interface for the packages in Fedora Extras. See this [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-l
    212 bytes (30 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...packages and then create a Fedora "spin" (Live + Installable DVD) of these packages.
    1 KB (172 words) - 04:42, 18 October 2008
  • * KDE 4 packages "branding" (#434815, add -DKDE_DISTRIBUTION_TEXT="Fedora packages" to %{cmake_kde4} in /etc/rpm/macros.kde4) * some non-functional KDE 3 packages were EOL'd
    4 KB (501 words) - 13:40, 28 May 2008
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    159 bytes (26 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • Additionally, all Fedora packages must contain the "X-Fedora" category. For packages that exist in Red Hat Linux, the categories must be the same as Red Hat's (
    2 KB (294 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...a open source server/gateway distribution built on the stable base of EL4 packages. I also work full time in a non-linux-related job, have a wife, baby on th Some packages that SME Server uses that aren't in Fedora yet include:
    2 KB (256 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • ...For example, http://www.jpackage.org/ distributes popular Java software as packages. ...ing. This setting specifies the location of a public key that verifies the packages provided by that repository. This public key is automatically imported the
    5 KB (697 words) - 01:11, 4 March 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Design Suite]]
    56 bytes (7 words) - 20:30, 22 August 2013
  • Multi-source packages are difficult to maintain and confusing to users. In addition: * fonts are comparatively bulky, and big font packages will be blacklisted from live-cds and by low-bandwidth users.
    2 KB (342 words) - 17:53, 7 December 2008
  • ...||will update packages on a per kernel basis||will update packages on a per kernel basis
    3 KB (295 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...ngJPP| Reasons for keeping "jpp" in the release strings for JPackage Java packages ]]
    222 bytes (29 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • packages defined, About Packages
    3 KB (353 words) - 01:10, 4 March 2009
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    118 bytes (17 words) - 14:48, 6 June 2017
  • Right now I am maintainer for the following packages:
    189 bytes (27 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == Rejected packages ==
    124 bytes (16 words) - 05:56, 8 September 2013
  • Mark Sonatype OSS Parent software packages as [[Packaging:Deprecating_Packages|deprecated]]. <code>sonatype-oss-parent</code> packages are intended to be
    3 KB (440 words) - 16:25, 7 January 2019
  • ...only build against packages it has a local copy of, under <code>/mnt/koji/packages</code>, and that directory is served via http to the public. ...cess for people running their own Koji instances. They can simply consume packages from an existing yum repo and skip the entire package import process.
    7 KB (1,247 words) - 18:43, 15 July 2008
  • ...red repositories. You may need to manually download and install additional packages in order to satisfy all of the dependencies. ...de it as new versions become available. To ensure that you have the latest packages, subscribe to e-mail or RSS services that notify you when new versions are
    2 KB (275 words) - 01:13, 4 March 2009
  • * Work is going on, starting with packages depending on Plasma. The packages depending on Plasma are now all upgraded to 4.1.80, we're still working on
    1 KB (140 words) - 17:30, 2 December 2008
  • ...re for Fedora. It aims to simplify the process of creating and maintaining packages in the Fedora repositories, and simplify the workflow between other Fedora Metadata for packages and other components are stored on the filesystem as a simple configuration
    2 KB (333 words) - 03:32, 2 May 2009
  • ** List of critical KDE packages for new update policy (requested by FESCo) * ''ACTION:'' ltinkl to rebuild all arch dep. packages in F-11, F-12, F-13
    1 KB (149 words) - 22:12, 17 September 2016
  • == Packages == List of packages selected/decided for CI Hackfests.
    3 KB (360 words) - 13:34, 10 August 2019
  • ...contain modules in the wrong place must be found and fixed (e.g. find all packages that BR: gcc-gfortran and contain '.mod' files). ...ch is already used and owned by gfortran. After that a mass rebuild of all packages containing Fortran modules must be performed.
    1 KB (210 words) - 20:18, 15 September 2009
  • === Early pre-Alpha packages === '''Note''': In each desktop environment you need both referenced packages (one contains the actual images and the other contains desktop specific inf
    2 KB (262 words) - 19:41, 15 May 2012
  • Mark Apache Jakarta Commons HttpClient software packages as Apache Jakarta Commons HttpClient software packages are intended to be
    3 KB (447 words) - 16:19, 7 January 2019
  • .../pub/linux/arm/fedora/diffs-f11/ set of patches] necessary to make Fedora packages build for ARM. ...eases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/ base F11 repository] which also includes packages that have been modified to build for ARM.
    3 KB (503 words) - 17:20, 17 November 2009
  • * How do new packages enter the collection/branch? Fedora maintainer? Reviews? * Would packages in this be able to conflict with epel packages? Base packages?
    3 KB (432 words) - 00:54, 8 September 2014
  • ...ectures/RISC-V|RISC-V]]. If you want to help build packages or fix broken packages, you've come to the right place. ...s://github.com/rwmjones/fedora-riscv-autobuild autobuilder] which picks up packages as they are built in [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ Fedora Koji build
    2 KB (359 words) - 11:48, 9 October 2021
  • The following packages need changes for OLPC The following packages are specific to OLPC
    2 KB (235 words) - 15:28, 29 March 2015
  • This document aims to specify the mechanism for gpg signing rpm packages and other files within the Fedora infrastructure. This mechanism proposal ...janed software. Ensuring that only appropriate people have access to sign packages is extremely important to the continued trust in the Fedora project. As su
    5 KB (838 words) - 19:06, 14 February 2009
  • 1. Get devel packages! install the packages
    1 KB (164 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • = Responsibilities of maintainers of packages in Fedora Extras = ...p the distribution in a reasonable state, someone will step in and rebuild packages that have had dependency issues for some time, but package maintainers shou
    6 KB (873 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • Rename graphics group to the design suite group and add necessary packages ...p would be fit. The group would also make it easy for users to install the packages.
    2 KB (343 words) - 08:35, 3 April 2011
  • ...th one another in order to ultimately create consumable media, images, and packages. ...oots on the various arches, as well as the ability to produce yum repos of packages from specific collections.
    2 KB (247 words) - 20:01, 21 April 2015
  • Mark Apache Maven 2.x software packages as [[Packaging:Deprecating_Packages|deprecated]]. Apache Maven 2.x software packages are intended to be eventually
    3 KB (456 words) - 16:23, 7 January 2019
  • ** additional packages for live images ([https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SebastianVahl '''additional packages for live images (~20 megs free)
    2 KB (334 words) - 17:42, 4 November 2008
  • virtualenv-2 ~/.virtualenvs/modularity --system-site-packages --prompt='(modularity) ' == Building the runtime from packages previously built in Koji ==
    2 KB (290 words) - 09:50, 6 July 2017
  • {{OldGuidelinePage|deprecating-packages}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora Packages}}
    4 KB (550 words) - 19:57, 21 December 2018
  • ...this is the limited space on the images. Please be aware that the excluded packages may change in the development process until Fedora 10 gets released. == Packages proposed for inclusion ==
    3 KB (434 words) - 21:28, 25 July 2008
  • packages as [[Packaging:Deprecating_Packages|deprecated]]. Apache Jakarta ORO and Apache Jakarta Commons Regexp software packages
    3 KB (478 words) - 16:21, 7 January 2019
  • Email: [[MailTo(packages AT SPAMFREE amiga-hardware DOT com)]
    236 bytes (32 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ...ectly relying on the incorrect behavior and allow maintainers to fix those packages.
    2 KB (271 words) - 21:51, 3 December 2009
  • # Proceed through install process selecting all packages - [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-May/090551.html this] # Anaconda functions properly and successfully installs required packages for complete
    882 bytes (123 words) - 08:32, 6 July 2010
  • ...contains unversioned libraries, they may be included in the non-devel base packages. ...ld.so.conf.d/ may be created to add a subdirectory to the ld search path. Packages may NOT modify /etc/ld.so.conf. If program foo installs libraries to /usr/
    2 KB (337 words) - 03:23, 6 January 2010
  • * Select individual packages. Selection stored in Database. 3 select package groups, individual packages - derived from comps and with the ability to search as well
    2 KB (324 words) - 10:34, 10 May 2010
  • * if some of your packages do not build, and you won't fix them, you can announce them as orphans * orphaned packages might get their "devel" branches removed from CVS completely, but this will
    1 KB (198 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • == shows builds (binary rpm packages in the repositories) == ...ink at the top instead redirect the user to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/geany/builds and "be done with it".
    3 KB (478 words) - 16:34, 14 August 2012
  • == Packages == .... You should not need to change this from the defaults for building Fedora packages.
    2 KB (358 words) - 21:12, 25 May 2008
  • ...intainers should seek out co-maintainers or just be orphaning the software packages they are not interested in. If it does happen for a shorter periods, others ...e conceived as a way to have maintainers react when they maintain too much packages, and not a way to punish maintainers.
    4 KB (645 words) - 21:51, 14 July 2008
  • {{for|information on the proposal|Critical Path Packages Proposal}} ...t provides some essential or core functionality. Updates for critical path packages must undergo additional verification before they can be distributed to the
    3 KB (465 words) - 06:03, 19 March 2024
  • It looks like all the packages that should provide this virtual provide are listed here. I remember having inspected those packages and if I recall well, they really requires a local smtp server.
    4 KB (665 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • * At Alpha Milestone, all packages should be testable and feature complete--whether they are "official feature * Changes to packages at and after the Alpha Milestone must follow the [[Branch Freeze Policy]].
    899 bytes (129 words) - 06:00, 2 September 2013
  • == Packages == ...-journald`, howtos, etc). For cluster type softwares, we would also create packages that contains ansible scripts to help deploy the cluster.
    3 KB (394 words) - 09:59, 8 February 2021
  • ...hat the package requires to build successfully. Typically, some ''-devel'' packages are listed there. See also [[HOWTOFindMissingBuildRequires]]. ...doing a foo-config --libs and foo-config --cflags to get strong hints what packages should be marked as foo's requirements. For example:
    2 KB (359 words) - 00:56, 3 June 2008
  • == Packages == Up-to-date list of packages maintained by the SIG can be found [https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/swa
    2 KB (249 words) - 17:22, 4 October 2022
  • ...talling, uninstalling, verifying, querying, and updating computer software packages. Each software package consists of an archive of files along with informati [[Category:Packages]]
    664 bytes (95 words) - 12:07, 1 October 2015
  • ...ity. These maintainers respond to bug reports, update packages and add new packages to the collection as needed. EPEL packagers are members of the Fedora "pack 1. If you are an existing Fedora package maintainer, you can maintain EPEL packages by becoming a maintainer or comaintainer of an existing EPEL package, which
    4 KB (623 words) - 22:35, 25 August 2015
  • Switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it. ...th gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19, out of 12712 packages 11687 built successfully, 933 packages failed to build both with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19 and gcc-4.7.2-9.fc19 (thus unl
    3 KB (466 words) - 05:48, 15 May 2013
  • Switch GCC in Fedora 11 to 4.4.x, rebuild all packages with it. ...0 has been released on April, 21st and is included in dist-f11. Almost all packages have been rebuilt.
    2 KB (371 words) - 18:56, 27 April 2009
  • = Guidelines for Cross-compilation packages = Cross-compiler packages follow this naming scheme:
    3 KB (459 words) - 02:14, 25 February 2009
  • ...ing R support in Fedora, which includes packaging the core runtime, add-on packages, IDEs and other components. ...fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/R/ Packaging guidelines for R packages]
    1 KB (210 words) - 08:30, 3 August 2022
  • == 2.1. About Packages == ...and remove software. For example, the Fedora installation process uses the packages supplied with Fedora to build or upgrade a system to your requirements.
    7 KB (1,056 words) - 01:11, 4 March 2009
  • == Included Packages == * [http://hongkong.proximity.on.ca/f13-arm-beta2/ A comparision] of the packages included in this beta release with the versions included in the primary 32-
    3 KB (433 words) - 15:01, 12 April 2011
  • Fedora and making it possible to easily build Fedora packages using of software packages or other types of projects such as generated
    3 KB (358 words) - 13:24, 11 February 2015
  • ...on, timezone and keyboard layout. Later steps will install any additional packages needed by the stateless server. == Installing Additional Packages and Initial Configuration of the Stateless Server ==
    5 KB (774 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • ...uto will be set by default. Auto will install recommended and supplemented packages only if there's no conflict. ...ch install recommended packages of already installed package and suggested packages.
    5 KB (838 words) - 17:36, 28 May 2015
  • * Parse mirror logs: what packages are being the most downloaded? * Number of packages over time
    2 KB (336 words) - 16:00, 26 April 2010
  • ...edora Extras is an extension of Fedora Core which provides many additional packages for users of the Fedora distribution. ...r the Fedora distribution. The tools in Fedora use these when looking for packages and updates for your computer. (Also sometimes called <code>repo</code>)
    4 KB (571 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • Switch GCC in Fedora 15 to 4.6.x, rebuild all packages with it. All packages should be rebuilt with the new gcc once it hits dist-f15.
    2 KB (343 words) - 11:04, 15 April 2011
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    136 bytes (20 words) - 14:48, 6 June 2017
  • [[Koschei|Koschei]] is a continuous integration service for Fedora packages. A PHP group exists, please add your packages (when a test suite is enabled at build time).
    705 bytes (111 words) - 15:10, 25 June 2015
  • ...x86_64 that are built from the same sources as the Fedora native toolchain packages (binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc.) Right now these are gcc-4.1 vintage.
    1 KB (147 words) - 12:02, 28 December 2011
  • == Packages ==
    2 KB (317 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...le against it. This feature seeks to rationalize and improve the Qpid C++ packages for users and developers. ...troduction of a new source package with new binary package names. The old packages and their source module would be removed.
    3 KB (404 words) - 18:13, 30 October 2009
  • Fedora includes a [[Fonts inclusion history|large selection]] of font packages. Unfortunately, due to lack of strong font release conventions, variable pa ...ing ways you can help enhance existing packages, and ways you can tune new packages during creation.
    3 KB (428 words) - 12:42, 23 March 2011
  • * EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace packages in RHEL or layered products. == What is the policy on updates for packages in EPEL? ==
    6 KB (969 words) - 22:04, 2 June 2008
  • ...d the base system. Using mock to test our packages will allow you to find packages with broken Build<code></code>Requires. This works for packages that fail to build. There is also the case where packages will build cleanly, but may be missing functionality, like the ability to d
    5 KB (845 words) - 19:26, 3 June 2008
  • ** View My Packages – link to packages app in profile
    880 bytes (149 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
  • == Non-provenpackager committable packages == ...he decisions made by FESCo in this matter do not imply a "free-for-all" on packages. If substantive changes to a package are made without consulting with the m
    2 KB (258 words) - 08:04, 18 September 2016
  • ...packages, either for new packages that have passed review, or for existing packages that need a new branch (e.g. EPEL). Release Engineering has written a scrip ...m (not on an infrastructure hosted system), be sure you have the following packages installed:
    1 KB (179 words) - 17:50, 3 November 2015
  • Fix dependency on crontab in packages containing cron jobs as well as migrate cron jobs that are applicable to na ...as migrate cron jobs that are applicable to native systemd timer units in packages that already depend on systemd.
    3 KB (396 words) - 11:52, 4 March 2014
  • == On maintaining packages == === Who is allowed to modify which packages ===
    2 KB (312 words) - 14:53, 20 March 2012
  • Switch GCC in Fedora 17 to 4.7.x, rebuild all packages with it. ...th gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17, out of 11270 packages 10056 built successfully, 845 packages failed to build both with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 and gcc-4.6.2-1.fc16 (thus unl
    3 KB (439 words) - 19:06, 13 February 2012
  • ...ection for you, take a look at [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages|list of available packages]] . All of them can be installed via usual mechanism. * [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages| Packages already in Fedora]]
    11 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 07:34, 19 May 2022
  • # Use rpm from the CLI to view a list installed packages (no root password required). Likewise, we should cover the topic of updating packages in a similar
    3 KB (437 words) - 01:15, 4 March 2009
  • ...ge groups, right-click on the package group name and choose to install all packages.
    1 KB (191 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • * Final packages for KDE 4.3 are already in rawhide. * Work on packages for F11 and F10 has started.
    2 KB (308 words) - 15:46, 5 August 2009
  • == New EPEL packages for EL-6 ==
    258 bytes (30 words) - 15:06, 6 May 2010
  • The following sections contain information regarding software packages that have undergone significant changes for Fedora 11. For easier access, t
    286 bytes (40 words) - 22:22, 9 February 2009
  • == Packages on the list == == Packages from school OS wiki ==
    3 KB (462 words) - 11:30, 11 December 2010
  • This is a text of mail sent by Richard to owners of packages that were suspected to have bad summaries. It's a good writeup of what shou or more packages in Fedora with a "poor summary"[1]. We've been
    3 KB (471 words) - 19:04, 24 February 2009
  • * after that is done we have to rebuild all packages to figure out the problems and fill bugs * only kdeadmin is left from the normal packages
    3 KB (436 words) - 13:39, 28 May 2008
  • ...ch of packages, to be known temporarily as "Fedora Complete", which is all packages formerly contained in Fedora Core and Fedora Extras; ...ra Desktop" or something similar, which is a collection of desktop-related packages (GNOME, X, Firefox, etc.) from Fedora Complete;
    6 KB (913 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • ...ith individual RPM packages. You may use it to manually install and remove packages from your system. If you install software with the <code>rpm</code> utility ...cent version of software packages. Other methods do not guarantee that the packages are current.}}
    7 KB (1,070 words) - 01:15, 4 March 2009
  • Packages that exist solely to contain additional language translations must be named ...end on the rpm name ending in -<langcode>, to find user requested language packages.
    866 bytes (139 words) - 16:40, 10 October 2013
  • == Interesting packages I maintain ==
    3 KB (467 words) - 16:59, 28 September 2010
  • * Informations for Package Maintainers (BR: kdelibs -> kdelibs3, building packages for KDE4) ...l desktop packages (KDE 4 as default and kdebase-workspace packaged). This packages doesn't exist in rawhide, yet.
    3 KB (342 words) - 20:38, 3 June 2008
  • ...and my personal goal is to make Fedora packaging more productive and keep packages consistent. ...va-related packages. For example: Lucene, Jetty and related packages, some packages in the Maven stack.
    2 KB (307 words) - 09:17, 21 March 2014
  • 1. The basic version contains only a few packages. So it is easier for someone to create his own version that builds upon it. 2. The desktop version contains the most usefull packages in the KDE universe that fits on one CD.
    7 KB (1,055 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • All Fedora packages are expected to got through [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-m ...e reviews that are in progress or completed for [[Virtualization]] related packages
    2 KB (245 words) - 11:12, 9 October 2021
  • ...lidate the package updating process for Core, Extras, and Legacy, allowing packages for any of the three trees to be updated using the same tool -- while still * Automatic QA of packages before they are submitted to the release team for signing/pushing
    2 KB (319 words) - 22:26, 8 January 2010
  • ...ity. These maintainers respond to bug reports, update packages and add new packages to the collection as needed. EPEL packagers are members of the Fedora "pack 1. If you are an existing Fedora package maintainer, you can maintain EPEL packages by becoming a maintainer or comaintainer of an existing EPEL package, which
    4 KB (666 words) - 20:04, 6 January 2022
  • ...um localinstall eclipse-swt-*.rpm", but notice that some of the dependency packages are ppc rather than ppc64. '''Don't let yum install them - cancel it!''' # Install the ppc64 variants of the packages that are shown as ppc. You can do this with "sudo yum install <package_nam
    2 KB (285 words) - 01:39, 9 April 2009
  • What Are Packages, and Why Manage Them? * Creating and Building RPM Packages:
    5 KB (591 words) - 13:11, 26 March 2014
  • xfs is fixed. All font packages are fixed. See documentation section. * Modify the font installation scripts and packages to add the proper links
    5 KB (771 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • '''Tips&tricks''' for updates of Perl packages. ...ted modules''': e.g. Module::Build is used for build and installation. New packages need the latest version, which
    4 KB (604 words) - 13:51, 16 August 2011
  • ...is that the first package to be installed should own the files that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ev Directory ownership is a little more complex than file ownership. Packages must own all directories they put files in, except for:
    6 KB (889 words) - 16:30, 18 August 2010
  • ...ckages were included due to not having a KDE specific spin. Whether these packages stay in the Prime spin once a KDE spin is available has not been decided. Bill wants a developer workstation to work on Fedora packages.
    2 KB (264 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • * (Existing) Extragear for KDE 4.3.3 packages will follow when buildroot is ready. * SebastianVahl proposed a splitting of KDE packages as a possible Feature for F13.
    2 KB (310 words) - 16:29, 10 November 2009
  • ...are allowed. In particular this part of the cycle is when major changes in packages or infrastructure should be done. ...package which is a dependency for other packages. Maintainers should test packages and evaluate potential changes during this time to make the later portions
    8 KB (1,239 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • Creating font packages or subpackages in Fedora is done using the ''fontpackages-devel'' package<r * a [[Simple fonts spec template|simple template]] for font source packages containing a single font family,
    1 KB (191 words) - 09:35, 22 November 2017
  • ...e confused with CVS tags. These buildsystem tags are used solely on built packages. The following tags are currently in use for Fedora development: ...awhide" or the Fedora development repository, as usable by yum. Note that packages are not automatically tagged with this. This means that if you build a pac
    6 KB (1,081 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • Update Fedora Haskell packages to the latest major version 7.4.1 of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Bumping ghc version requires a complete rebuild of all Haskell packages against the new version.
    2 KB (327 words) - 12:11, 17 October 2012
  • ...not amusing when offenders were marginal games, but when core distribution packages make the same mistakes we have a problem. == No bundling of fonts in other packages ==
    2 KB (298 words) - 14:13, 20 October 2011
  • ...aproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/ orphaned packages]. This keeps out unowned software and prevents future problems down the roa # Retriring packages nobody wants to adopt.
    3 KB (483 words) - 20:28, 2 October 2021
  • = Banish kernel module packages from Fedora entirely = Entirely banish all packages containing kernel modules from Fedora, except for the kernel itself. Any no
    3 KB (522 words) - 14:13, 21 November 2008
  • The basic principles for packages in the core group are: * '''As small as possible, but no smaller''' The packages in core aren't a separate mini-distribution but instead are the base of Fed
    2 KB (256 words) - 16:13, 12 November 2012
  • ...scriptlets that are created by one package but will be invoked when other packages are added or removed from the system. They can have unwanted side effects ...complete commandline parameters. The bash-completion package allows other packages to drop short scripts into /etc/bash_completion.d that extend the functiona
    2 KB (245 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...braries which may be imported or linked to by other code, see [[#Mixed Use Packages]] below. ...ntains utility programs that can be run by users as well, see [[#Mixed Use Packages]] below.
    3 KB (411 words) - 16:28, 3 May 2018
  • ==Packages==
    1 KB (236 words) - 11:22, 2 November 2014
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    217 bytes (31 words) - 18:59, 12 June 2011
  • === Status on Critical path packages triage list === ...-base into a separate @critical-path-build group and triage could skip the packages in the -build group.
    2 KB (238 words) - 07:54, 18 September 2016
  • * Create high-quality packages of design tools featuring graphics, web, arts and some video editings. * Actively review each other's design-related packages to shorten the time it takes to get them approved and imported into Fedora
    5 KB (646 words) - 00:12, 10 April 2021
  • = How to package Octave packages = If you are interested in packaging Octave packages, you should check here for upstream sources:
    6 KB (813 words) - 17:06, 8 March 2014
  • ...ras; right now Core packages are built internally to Red Hat, while Extras packages are built through the Extra build system. Eliminating the distinction invol
    991 bytes (131 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • Every release prior to the Feature Freeze we deprecate all packages that [[FTBFS]]. This keeps out software that no longer builds from source, # Detecting a list of FTBFS packages and the dependencies that will be broken if they are removed.
    5 KB (729 words) - 17:52, 3 November 2015
  • = Virtual Provides: in packages = ...beneficial to add a "virtual provision" into those packages so that other packages can have dependencies to the functionality they require instead of hardwiri
    3 KB (475 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • ...e other packages with broken deps were rebuild, too (mostly plasma related packages). * Although there are no packages using this at the moment, KevinKofler will try to fix these issues.
    3 KB (382 words) - 18:31, 9 December 2008
  • * packages - The packages app ( https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages ) was not moved from the old datacenter. Two replacements are in progress f
    721 bytes (112 words) - 19:44, 2 July 2021
  • * not including Localization packages (see "Language Customization") * Add Localized Packages
    975 bytes (128 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • Bob only cares about x86_64 - he does not want any i386 packages on his packages should be included as multilib or waiting for those packages to
    7 KB (1,034 words) - 15:48, 9 July 2008
  • Packages database: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pmpu
    400 bytes (56 words) - 07:54, 17 September 2008
  • Install yum-utils and issue the following command to see what packages are using package "foo":
    422 bytes (56 words) - 22:04, 22 February 2009
  • ...and Provides for PEAR and PECL packages and Macros and Scriptlets for PECL packages). [12:10] <spot> RemiFedora: the "Packages with channels" section has a lot of TODO in it
    7 KB (978 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
  • I maintain or comaintain several Fedora packages, mostly Haskell-related.
    277 bytes (40 words) - 12:06, 30 June 2010
  • * Number of NEW packages this week with short descriptions * People who pushed the most packages to updates this week.
    2 KB (270 words) - 09:11, 18 September 2016
  • * are there other i386 packages that might be interesting for the x86_64 tree? Packages that are missing in x86_64-fedora-extras because...
    1 KB (220 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • To use <code>yum</code>, specify a function and one or more packages or package groups. Each section below gives some examples. ...transaction may include the installation, update, or removal of additional packages, in order to resolve software dependencies.
    7 KB (1,029 words) - 01:14, 4 March 2009
  • ...ra, as well as drawing them into longer term roles such as maintaining new packages. * Creating and proposing new packages as well as their dependencies
    3 KB (535 words) - 16:17, 18 February 2010
  • ** thomasj ACLs for KDE core packages '''thomasj ACLs for KDE core packages'''
    1 KB (135 words) - 15:22, 7 September 2010
  • Packages in epel8-playground are primarily to be used in the following manner: ...e without any Service Level Expectations. You may want to only cherry pick packages from there as needed.
    3 KB (499 words) - 19:41, 22 February 2022
  • ...Linux (EPEL) repository (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL). The list of packages is not specified here, because it may need to fluctuate over time, but a li ...If the organization desires to no longer support maintaining one or more packages in the future, its only responsibility is to follow the normal procedure to
    3 KB (453 words) - 20:04, 6 January 2022
  • * RexDieter introduced a new "Provides:" so that dependent packages could be tracked easier: sip(sip_api_major_version) = sip_api_version ...pre-release snapshots or the work will start when upstream has tagged the packages.
    2 KB (273 words) - 17:25, 17 November 2009
  • * Percentage of completion: 100% (All known packages have been rebuilt against XR 1.9.1 -- and the mass rebuild helped ensure th ...ase of XULRunner to 1.9.1 as well, and includes rebuilds of some dependent packages.
    2 KB (247 words) - 15:21, 9 June 2009
  • ...gnoring the Freeze Process|Ignoring the freeze process and introducing new packages anyway can result in your package being reverted or reduce the chances of r * At Beta Freeze, all packages should be code complete, all known bugs should be fixed, as we prepare the
    3 KB (463 words) - 22:27, 25 September 2014
  • * langpacks packages; https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_langpacks_packages * dnf-langpacks plugin (obsoleted by langpacks packages) ; https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_dnf_langpacks_plugin
    2 KB (219 words) - 05:22, 12 April 2016
  • Many of the Java packages in Fedora contain native code in addition to the usual bytecode. If you ha * For packages in which all jarfiles are in the main package:
    3 KB (402 words) - 11:45, 3 June 2011
  • Leaf packages may start to be moved soon. All packages WILL be moved by Test 2, gating on feature #1. Reviews will
    1,021 bytes (146 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • # The kickstart must '''not''' have ''--ignoremissing'' to ''%packages'' # The kickstart should '''not''' alter the behaviour of packages, and any changes to application configuration files should therefore be mot
    3 KB (532 words) - 13:56, 30 June 2013
  • * '''Missing widget:''' Need to add alert widget for "My Packages" in the right sidebar == Packages Tab ==
    2 KB (365 words) - 14:10, 20 July 2009
  • Formalize packaging for KDE4 packages. Currently, KDE4-dependent packages are inconsistent and use mixes of <code>%{_kde4_*}</code> and standard macr ...KDE/Packaging/Cleanup|cleanup]] on the KDE SIG's end would update existing packages to this guideline.
    2 KB (273 words) - 00:59, 6 August 2009
  • [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/thofmann/ My packages]
    297 bytes (40 words) - 10:15, 25 April 2017
  • * Automatic QA of packages before they are submitted to the release team * Moves packages to proper updates stage
    2 KB (251 words) - 22:27, 8 January 2010
  • ...ystem" python binary, /usr/bin/python is Python 2.4, and all add-on python packages are for the 2.4 syntax, and byte-compiled for 2.4. == Available Packages for EPEL5 ==
    5 KB (763 words) - 16:54, 7 December 2011
  • ...ume, but this is actually just a (positive) side-effect of getting lots of packages reviewed. * Licensing. We're sticking with the license text must be in the binary packages.
    1 KB (197 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • Allow users to install packages offline from the installation media (using package kit) after the installat Currently we have no way to add software packages from offline media (DVDs/CDs) after installation (Package Kit and yum-cli d
    1 KB (162 words) - 20:08, 19 November 2008
  • All main packages except eclipse-mylyn have been retired. == Implications for Eclipse Mylyn (version < 3.5.0) Dependent Packages ==
    5 KB (625 words) - 12:25, 13 August 2012
  • ...hich people interested in taken on some maintainership duties for existing packages can earn sponsorship and thus gain full access to the Fedora code repositor ...o include upstream developers into co-maintainer roles for existing Fedora packages, or in situations where a current Fedora packager is looking to transition
    3 KB (438 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...t file bugs in the fedora bugzilla if you are using unofficial or snapshot packages. For 2D there are no other packages required. If 3D is being tested, the utopia RPMS's should be used.
    4 KB (615 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...ra contributors that are interested in building a Live DVD out of existing packages which are well tested and completely stable. Our Mission is to provide a st ...se. The DVD will contain all the packages contained by the Live CD and the packages suggested by the community.
    1,002 bytes (168 words) - 03:58, 27 December 2018
  • Currently existing packages which depend on blender have to be tested to make sure that they * Try out addon packages which require blender
    2 KB (263 words) - 15:35, 10 August 2011
  • ...rs of packages in Atomic Host feedback and gating for each change to those packages. * We assemble an Atomic Host image and do integration testing on the packages that are contained in that image.
    2 KB (311 words) - 10:32, 28 April 2017
  • {{Admon/tip | See the [[DotNet]] wiki page for details about dotnet packages and other useful info.}} ...t maintain [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DotNet .NET Core] (and related) packages in Fedora.
    2 KB (321 words) - 20:57, 8 May 2024
  • == Included Packages == * [http://hongkong.proximity.on.ca/f13-arm-beta1/ A comparision] of the packages included in this beta release with the versions included in the primary 32-
    3 KB (484 words) - 06:21, 26 April 2011
  • == Drupal Packages Insight Uses == Future packages we may need?
    2 KB (197 words) - 21:34, 3 November 2011
  • Fedora Packages are maintained collectively by a community of both Red Hat members and volu ...Fedora 7, '''there no longer are separate Core and Extras repositories'''. Packages are maintained by both Red Hat employees and community volunteers in the ''
    4 KB (456 words) - 16:27, 23 December 2009
  • ...documentation". For Fedora, this is our Release notes, so if you have any packages which use this license, you MUST be sure to have the appropriate acknowledg This is from NUnit, other packages may have different notices/copyright holders:
    1 KB (240 words) - 03:36, 21 December 2008
  • ...is still needed (maven-3.x even Requires it). To fully get rid of several packages need to be changed or fixed. This page will try to propose a migration plan ...simply use things generated by %add_maven_depmap macro directly (simplify packages)
    2 KB (327 words) - 07:56, 14 June 2011
  • It was primary created for signing packages, but can call anything you want to. ...esultdir), which will be expanded to name of directory where are final rpm packages.
    884 bytes (135 words) - 19:01, 15 October 2015
  • ...tomic images. Eventually the goal would be to move RH tests for all Fedora packages (if they exist). This project will involve several phases. Because this involves ~400 packages, we need to have a central place to bring all the tests in (especially beca
    2 KB (310 words) - 20:51, 24 May 2017
  • * Packages are more and more only a basic KDE desktop due to recent new dependecies (e * remaining packages depending on gtk2:
    1 KB (179 words) - 13:22, 22 December 2009
  • * Is it limited to a particular set of packages or the entire repository?
    495 bytes (66 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • ...E4yaHNuY21ZVko4RHBTRW5CcklrZ0E&hl=en spreadsheet]] I created tracking the packages which need to be updated and the bugzilla requests around those All packages have been updated and rebuilt. Updates have been submitted to bugzilla and
    3 KB (460 words) - 05:35, 20 April 2011
  • * Continue review of Core packages after release of F7. All packages need to review before the release of F8. * how do we review ~1160 packages from Core for Extras in less then X months (X=something between 2 and 5 afa
    2 KB (372 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • The goal of the CI tests should be to test integration of llvm packages into the system. Tests for specific upstream bugs are not necessary, but === Step 3: Request dist-git repos for compatibility packages ===
    4 KB (606 words) - 00:34, 15 July 2021
  • {{DISPLAYTITLE:Guidelines for Versioning Fedora Packages}}
    291 bytes (38 words) - 00:19, 27 February 2019
  • You may optionally install these sub-packages as well: Basic heartbeat package plus optional extra sub-packages:
    2 KB (327 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • There's a few packages that hold all of the trademarks and Fedora specific system configuration. These packages will need to be replaced when rebranding Fedora. Some of the files though,
    2 KB (287 words) - 18:32, 30 December 2008
  • ...still expected to have this defined, but that is not the case for building packages for Fedora and for CentOS and EL versions newer than v5. Leave it out of yo A useful command to show what groups are being used by a set of packages:
    2 KB (261 words) - 19:37, 11 February 2017
  • model is a community model, meaning if you want these packages to be involved in maintaining the packages.
    6 KB (917 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ...d of file deps outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin in our packages as much as possible, too, as they sometimes slow down yum's depsolving a lo Requires changes to yum, createrepo, and potentially other packages such as rpm.
    1 KB (212 words) - 18:39, 1 August 2008
  • ...ure of and that thus need manual intervention. This is currently about 50 packages ...e actual process by hand for those packages. The "apparently not in FC-6" packages are likely moves from Core -> Extras and just need confirmation. '''(done -
    3 KB (589 words) - 21:56, 8 January 2010
  • There is a subset of RPM packages that, due to various legal reasons, Fedora cannot distribute, even though w ...to legally get the codec, verify the integrity of the content, and receive packages that integrate nicely into a Fedora system.
    808 bytes (141 words) - 23:43, 29 August 2022
  • ...s in Fedora and serves as a way for us to manage commit access to the ROCm packages. Any planning work will be done as part of the [[SIGs/HC|Heterogeneous Comp
    861 bytes (123 words) - 16:50, 29 August 2023
  • Preliminary build has yielded some data about packages and their dependencies. I will be working towards making a complete list al NOTE: The dependency tree listed here are only packages not currently in EPEL.
    2 KB (308 words) - 14:29, 22 February 2010
  • == Respin Fedora With Custom Packages == ...ional Packages'' button. It is possible to select, or remove, all optional packages within a sub-category by right-clicking and selecting the appropriate menu
    3 KB (480 words) - 20:36, 19 September 2016
  • My personal motivation for splitting the KDE packages into more granulated packages could be differed into these steps: # Some repeating requests in the german fedora forum to split the packages like other distributions.
    3 KB (504 words) - 16:31, 16 November 2009
  • ...s and finally some tips and tricks that make maintaining a large number of packages easier. ...st of the packages for Xfce and the LXDE desktop. With more than a hundred packages he now is one of Fedora's most active package maintainers. Christoph works
    2 KB (369 words) - 23:32, 27 May 2009
  • Here's a list of documents about testing various packages in Fedora.
    128 bytes (16 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • * Add the 'All Packages' navigation with links to all packages, builds, and updates so they are available with only one click. Add this pa
    2 KB (187 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
  • ...key. This provides confidence to Fedora's users about the authenticity of packages provided by Fedora. ...or 5 days, so it needs to be started well in advance of when you need the packages all signed.
    2 KB (402 words) - 17:56, 3 November 2015
  • ...ora| binary packages]] . If you just want to things out, then using the packages are probably the best way to go. If you want to help with development, gre
    2 KB (335 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • ...programs. Beyond Fedora Core, Fedora Extras provides a massive number of packages for all kinds of purposes. You can truly use it however you wish. ...thout important security fixes. With rapid response times and maintenance packages for previous releases, Fedora stands behind its releases. Even releases th
    2 KB (359 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • == CA certificate packages == ...oned, by default the directory /etc/pki/cacerts/ is empty. There should be packages that provide some default certificates, for example, cacerts-mozilla and ca
    4 KB (546 words) - 17:32, 3 June 2008
  • ...n/question/39797/sticky-what-third-party-repositories-can-i-use-to-install-packages-that-arent-available-in-fedora/ Ask Fedora page] RPM Fusion's packages are layered in [https://rpmfusion.org/FAQ#What_packages_are_available_from_
    2 KB (273 words) - 20:38, 29 July 2022
  • maintainers will be allowed to issue updates to existing packages, but no new packages can be introduced. Maintainers are strongly urged to
    2 KB (251 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • ...o be able to configure notifications about CI test results for '''selected packages''' I am interested in. ...developer I want to enable notifications about CI test results for '''all packages I am maintaining'''.
    1 KB (246 words) - 11:39, 21 June 2018
  • '''All Fedora packages must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one suppor '''All Fedora packages must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one suppor
    1 KB (139 words) - 18:03, 13 October 2011
  • 1. Confirm that packages are downloaded 1. Check anaconda log to confirm that packages are being pulled from on-disk cache
    5 KB (734 words) - 16:30, 25 November 2008
  • * Ability to express "arch dependencies" between packages (#235755) A handful of packages need to be ported to the new API, patches for the
    6 KB (989 words) - 04:47, 17 October 2008
  • Perl 6 module packages generally follow the naming scheme of <code>rakudo-<'''''Perl-6-Module-Name are owned by the rakudo interpreter package. The Perl 6 module packages only own the files and directories underneath the directories <code>%perl6_
    2 KB (302 words) - 09:39, 1 July 2017
  • ...and working for Red Hat. I'm in the RHEL kernel group, but maintain a few packages in Fedora (both Core and Extras, with more coming down the road). My person
    481 bytes (81 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • minimal until the full set of packages is ready to land at once. Existing packages will need to be updated to 4.6 in rawhide.
    4 KB (604 words) - 17:36, 17 April 2009
  • * Rebuild all dual-lived packages (83) - otherwise dnf recommends --skip-broken and fails * Rebuild packages needed for minimal build-root
    5 KB (740 words) - 16:23, 8 May 2024
  • ...onvenient installation and for the purpose of testing the functionality of packages before they are published in the real repository. ...2#c2 See here] for an example of us enforcing this policy. You will find packages needing candidate binary testing in the [http://www.fedora.us/PUBLISH PUBLI
    4 KB (590 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...dependencies, 45 packages that are excluded from building on ia64 and 162 packages that have errors and fail to build. == list of packages excluded from building on ia64 ==
    4 KB (493 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ...e been introduced, so produced packages are fully compatible with RPM 4.7. Packages directly depending on librpm need to be rebuilt due to soname change, no ot * Has survived dist-upgrades, huge installs, rebuilds of complex packages, yum updates, and the included test suite.
    3 KB (353 words) - 10:05, 8 January 2010
  • ...y packaged activities can be found [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/*sugar-**/ here]
    236 bytes (33 words) - 05:57, 19 September 2014
  • ** Builds all the packages in separate Koji buildroot and tags them to separate per module build tag. * Currently generates RPM repository from packages in Koji. These can be defined by:
    2 KB (266 words) - 20:53, 30 August 2017
  • === Status on Critical path packages triage list === * arxs has slim down the list to cover only the src packages from the three @core, @critical-path-base and @critical-path-gnome groups w
    2 KB (305 words) - 07:54, 18 September 2016
  • (and the accompanying NetworkManager packages) which removes the affected debug code. Updated packages:
    3 KB (397 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • Anyone can help, from testing packages to voting on what we concentrate our efforts on. It will help if you alread ...ow indicates results from the most recent review and can be used to assign packages to yourself. I am imagining that these go in the comments section with a li
    1 KB (191 words) - 18:49, 1 January 2010
  • ...any of them during the resolution. Let's consider following definition of packages in the repository for examples within this document: ...two "same" package dependencies should be installed. When you install the packages using command line package manager like DNF, you can prefer the provide dep
    5 KB (685 words) - 18:09, 21 December 2015
  • ...e a base on which developers can build their applications, only pulling in packages that their software requires.
    2 KB (236 words) - 03:57, 23 January 2009
  • Sindre Pedersen Bjordal also maintains a few packages for Fedora Extras.
    348 bytes (59 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • 1click install is very simple way to install packages. <summary>Nonfree packages</summary>
    3 KB (421 words) - 20:34, 1 August 2008
  • * Than proposed %subject% - split current one big srpm to many packages ** cons - koji/bodhi overhead/more packages, has to be scripted
    2 KB (272 words) - 15:56, 12 January 2010
  • ...er-manual/downloading-and-installing-kdenlive/pre-compiled-packages/fedora-packages]] for the current packaging status. Create a set of packages for Fedora that do not depend upon any incompatible libraries or non-free c
    2 KB (213 words) - 09:19, 3 December 2009
  • * Install the packages therein * Report on the stability of the packages
    1 KB (153 words) - 19:33, 3 June 2008
  • [[Category:Packages]]
    435 bytes (66 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...All the packages will be audio related, other than that there will be some packages like text editors etc. 1.Searching and adding relevant packages to the final list by holding IRC meetings and talking with the mentor.
    5 KB (886 words) - 20:29, 8 April 2012
  • = Debuginfo packages = ...hem for packagers. For usage information and an explanation why debuginfo packages are important, see [[StackTraces]].
    6 KB (890 words) - 19:56, 21 December 2018
  • ...from humans, on fedora test list, and not messages regarding some updated packages being released for {latest-1, latest, next, next+1} fedora versions.
    251 bytes (42 words) - 16:59, 11 February 2013
  • 1 /fedora/SRPMS -- SRPM packages 1 /fedora/new/new -- directory for new and updated packages
    2 KB (311 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == Packages and Programs ==
    2 KB (191 words) - 07:00, 3 September 2017
  • ...All the packages will be audio related, other than that there will be some packages like text editors etc. 1.Searching and adding relevant packages to the final list by holding IRC meetings and talking with the mentor.
    6 KB (894 words) - 20:46, 8 April 2012
  • * Secondary rebuilds underway for packages with tag-merge conflicts. ...This has also always entailed yours truly assisting maintainers of client packages in decoding cryptic boostese seen in output from g++. Such care is to be e
    5 KB (675 words) - 10:21, 20 February 2015
  • The whole lifecycle of one of our font packages is described [[Font_package_lifecycle|there]].
    12 members (11 subcategories, 0 files) - 09:32, 24 January 2009
  • ==Proposed Packaging Guidelines for Documentation Packages generated by Publican== '''Proposed:''' Documentation packages be named with the OS version number in the package name to allow parallel i
    3 KB (421 words) - 19:57, 30 March 2009
  • == Install Packages == You must install necessary packages of Extras repository: <pre>
    3 KB (488 words) - 18:33, 3 June 2008
  • ...er of others who maintain packages. Listed as owning 6 and maintaining 325 packages. #* i don't maintain 360 packages. it's wrong.
    6 KB (1,001 words) - 18:50, 8 March 2010
  • * Create and post announcements for fixed packages to proper mailinglists packages -- but
    2 KB (318 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • ...ackage to be included in Fedora. Including management packages and feature packages built on top of Condor. == Optional Feature Packages ==
    2 KB (309 words) - 13:15, 28 July 2009
  • ...ail gating tests and be blocked from stable push, so when trying to update packages with dependency implications like this, you should [https://docs.fedoraproj ...lt, you can create an update from the side tag, which will contain all the packages.
    3 KB (543 words) - 18:53, 29 February 2024
  • * [https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages fedora-packages]
    442 bytes (47 words) - 17:32, 13 June 2014
  • ...This has also always entailed yours truly assisting maintainers of client packages in decoding cryptic boostese seen in output from g++. Such care is to be e ...breakage inherent in bumping Boost sonames. There were almost 250 client packages total. I expect these numbers to stay largely the same for Fedora 21.
    5 KB (716 words) - 15:48, 5 November 2014
  • a. Who actually tests these packages? ...st" documents ought to come-from/contributed-to by maintainers of relavent packages (in Fedora).
    5 KB (862 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • file types, including ELF binaries, system libraries, RPM packages, and Updated packages:
    3 KB (444 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...evelopers, who are new to the RPM package format, started with their first packages. * Installing packages using rpm, yum, zypper
    3 KB (437 words) - 20:20, 14 May 2010
  • the Essex group of OpenStack packages were added to EPEL as a single [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED be updated with simplified instructions as the packages evolve and
    3 KB (363 words) - 18:49, 8 May 2012
  • == List of the packages split == ==Packages marked for removal from the KDE Netbook Spin==
    2 KB (269 words) - 17:53, 29 June 2010
  • | 0 || Grid and HPC Operations Center of A.U.Th || Not-Public || Building packages for local fabric needs. Maintenance of RPM repositories. | 2 || CERN || Not Public || Building packages for CERN's software and OS repositories
    4 KB (597 words) - 12:05, 28 May 2022
  • ...ven packaging can be time-consuming and full of repetition even for simple packages. To simplify Maven packaging new XMvn tools and macros have been developed. ...o migrate all packages to use XMvn instead of mvn-rpmbuild script. Several packages have already been converted as part of initial testing:
    4 KB (536 words) - 19:37, 7 November 2013
  • ===Dependency packages=== * In order to build Flume with full features those are the dependency packages and their status:
    2 KB (308 words) - 16:56, 9 April 2016
  • ...roject is to produce a build system that can be used to build & manage the packages for both Core and Extras.
    329 bytes (48 words) - 14:03, 11 July 2008
  • ...f packages, and also to get some requested KDE Applications into their own packages. * Maintainer time. The aforementioned split of packages will require more time from the maintainers. If we continue to do the work
    3 KB (478 words) - 15:13, 29 April 2024
  • = Packages with Uncommitted F12 Patches = These packages were patched for the F12 Fedora-ARM build, but the patches were not committ
    18 KB (2,489 words) - 19:50, 30 July 2010
  • ...takes many active steps to mitigate these risks, including GPG signing of packages, distributing the mirror list via HTTPS, and performing basic content valid ...ral public, and a different set of packages for an intended victim. These packages must still be signed by the Fedora key, but could be stale, which could kee
    4 KB (645 words) - 16:47, 4 March 2010
  • = Use license macro in RPMs for packages in Cloud Image = # In addition to the desired space-savings, this installs packages without their possibly-mandatory license files
    5 KB (744 words) - 15:21, 13 October 2014
View (previous 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)